Cannabinoid agonist WIN-55,212-2 partially restores neurogenesis in the aged rat brain

“A decline in neurogenesis in the hippocampus may underlie age-related memory impairment in rats and humans. We now show that WIN 55,212-2 administration for 3 weeks can partially restore neurogenesis in the hippocampus of aged rats. Cannabinoid receptor stimulation therapy may thus provide clinical benefit for humans with age-associated memory impairment.”

“This report shows for the first time the potential therapeutic efficacy of endocannabinoid receptor stimulation in stimulating neurogenesis from proliferation to engraftment during normal aging in vivo. The current results, coupled with our previous observations regarding the role of endocannabinoid receptors, underscores the potential clinical benefits of cannabinoid pharmacotherapies during normal and pathological brain aging.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3011092/

Anti-inflammatory property of the cannabinoid agonist WIN-55212-2 in a rodent model of chronic brain inflammation

“Cannabinoid receptors (CBr) stimulation induces numerous central and peripheral effects. A growing interest in the beneficial properties of manipulating the endocannabinoid system has lead to the possible involvement of CBr in the control of brain inflammation… Our results emphasize the potential use of CBr agonists in the regulation of inflammatory processes within the brain; this knowledge may lead to the use of CBr agonists in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases associated with chronic neuroinflammation, such as Alzheimer disease.”

“The current report is the first to our knowledge to demonstrate the modulatory role of cannabinoids in an animal model of chronic neuroinflammation, pointing out the effectiveness of a CBr agonist on the consequences of LPS mediated neuroinflammation at a dose (0.5 mg/kg/day i.p. of WIN-55212-2) that does not impair performance in a patial memory task. These results further advocate for the manipulation of the endocannabinoid system to diminish the consequences of neuroinflammation in progression of AD and others inflammation-related diseases.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852513/

Cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker rimonabant (SR 141716) for treatment of alcohol dependence: results from a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Abstract

“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that the endocannabinoid system is implicated in the development of alcohol dependence. In addition, in animal models, the cannabinoid receptor 1 blocker rimonabant was found to decrease alcohol consumption, possibly by indirect modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission. This was a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study to assess the possible efficacy of the cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonist rimonabant 20 mg/d (2 x 10 mg) in the prevention of relapse to alcohol in recently detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. A total of 260 patients were included, 258 were exposed to medication, and 208 (80.6%) were men. Patients had an alcohol history of 15 years on average. More patients in the rimonabant group (94/131 [71.8%]) completed treatment compared with the placebo group (79/127 [62.2%]). Although there was a modest effect of rimonabant with respect to relapse rate, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups. Approximately 41.5% of the rimonabant group had relapsed to drinking at the end of the study compared with 47.7% of the placebo group (obtained from Kaplan-Meier-curve). Differences were more marked but not statistically significant in patients who relapsed to heavy drinking: 27.7% versus 35.6%, respectively. Safety and tolerance of the drug were good. Similar rates of adverse events were reported between the 2 groups; less patients experienced serious events or discontinued the treatment with rimonabant compared with placebo. Rates of depression-related events were low (3.8% with rimonabant compared with 1.6% with placebo). Patients on rimonabant lost weight (Mean, -1.7 kg) compared with baseline, whereas there was no such change in the placebo group. Weight loss was more pronounced in patients with a higher body mass index. In addition, there was a significant decrease in leptin levels in the rimonabant group compared with baseline. Lack of efficacy in this study may be explained by a very high response rate in the placebo group and a relatively short treatment duration. Taking the substantial numbers of animal studies suggesting a possible role of CB1 antagonists for the treatment of alcohol dependence into account, it seems worthwhile to further test cannabinoid blockers in the treatment of alcoholism.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18480689

Functional interactions between endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems: focus on alcohol, genetics and drug-addicted behaviors.

Abstract

“Although the first studies regarding the endogenous opioid system and addiction were published during the 1940s, addiction and cannabinoids were not addressed until the 1970s. Currently, the number of opioid addiction studies indexed in PubMed-Medline is 16 times greater than the number of cannabinoid addiction reports. More recently, functional interactions have been demonstrated between the endogenous cannabinoid and opioid systems. For example, the cannabinoid brain receptor type 1 (CB1) and mu opioid receptor type 1 (MOR1) co-localize in the same presynaptic nerve terminals and signal through a common receptor-mediated G-protein pathway. Here, we review a great variety of behavioral models of drug addiction and alcohol-related behaviors. We also include data providing clear evidence that activation of the cannabinoid and opioid endogenous systems via WIN 55,512-2 (0.4-10 mg/kg) and morphine (1.0-10 mg/kg), respectively, produces similar levels of relapse to alcohol in operant alcohol self-administration tasks. Finally, we discuss genetic studies that reveal significant associations between polymorphisms in MOR1 and CB1 receptors and drug addiction. For example, the SNP A118G, which changes the amino acid aspartate to asparagine in the MOR1 gene, is highly associated with altered opioid system function. The presence of a microsatellite polymorphism of an (AAT)n triplet near the CB1 gene is associated with drug addiction phenotypes. But, studies exploring haplotypes with regard to both systems, however, are lacking.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20196742cannabinoid op

BLOCKING CANNABINOID CB1 RECEPTORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NICOTINE DEPENDENCE: INSIGHTS FROM PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL STUDIES

Abstract

“Tobacco use is one of the leading preventable causes of death in developed countries. Since existing medications are only partially effective in treating tobacco smokers, there is a great need for improved medications for smoking cessation. It has been recently proposed that cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists represent a new class of therapeutic agents for drug dependence, and notably, nicotine dependence. Here, we will review current evidence supporting the use of this class of drugs for smoking cessation treatment. Pre-clinical studies indicate that nicotine exposure produces changes in endocannabinoid content in the brain. In experimental animals, N-piperidinyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methylpyrazole-3-carboxamide (rimonabant, SR141716) and N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251), two cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists, block nicotine self-administration behavior, an effect that may be related to the blockade of the dopamine-releasing effects of nicotine in the brain. Rimonabant also seems efficacious in decreasing the influence of nicotine-associated stimuli over behavior, suggesting that it may act on two distinct neuronal pathways, those implicated in drug-taking behavior and those involved in relapse phenomena. The utility of rimonabant has been evaluated in several clinical trials. It seems that rimonabant is an efficacious treatment for smoking cessation, although its efficacy does not exceed that of nicotine-replacement therapy and its use may be limited by emotional side effects (nausea, anxiety and depression, mostly). Rimonabant also appears to decrease relapse rates in smokers. These findings indicate significant, but limited, utility of rimonabant for smoking cessation.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2752688/

Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonists as Promising New Medications for Drug Dependence

 “This review examines the development of cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists as a new class of therapeutic agents for drug addiction. Abused drugs [alcohol, opiates, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), and psychostimulants, including nicotine] elicit a variety of chronically relapsing disorders by interacting with endogenous neural pathways in the brain. In particular, they share the common property of activating mesolimbic dopamine brain reward systems, and virtually all abused drugs elevate dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are expressed in this brain reward circuit and modulate the dopamine-releasing effects of Δ9-THC and nicotine. Rimonabant (SR141716), a CB1 receptor antagonist, blocks both the dopamine-releasing and discriminative and rewarding effects of Δ9-THC in animals. Blockade of CB1 receptor activity by genetic invalidation also decreases rewarding effects of opiates and alcohol in animals. Although CB1 receptor blockade is generally ineffective in reducing the self-administration of cocaine in rodents and primates, it reduces the reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior produced by cocaine-associated conditioned stimuli and cocaine-priming injections. Likewise, CB1 receptor blockade is effective in reducing nicotine-seeking behavior induced by re-exposure to nicotine-associated stimuli. Some of these findings have been recently validated in humans. In clinical trials, Rimonabant blocks the subjective effects of Δ9-THC in humans and prevents relapse to smoking in exsmokers. Findings from both clinical and preclinical studies suggest that ligands blocking CB1 receptors offer a novel approach for patients suffering from drug dependence that may be efficacious across different classes of abused drugs.”

“Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Blockade: A Step Forward in Drug-Dependence Therapy?”

“Despite advances in the understanding of neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms that lead to drug dependence over the last 20 years, no effective treatment is yet available for cocaine or Δ9-THC dependence. Moreover, medications available for ethanol, nicotine, or opioid dependence are ineffective in many subjects. For example, the rate of smoking cessation by subjects entering into clinical trials that combine effective medication and behavioral and cognitive therapy is around 30% at one year; most subjects relapse. Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists represent a potentially useful tool not only for blocking the direct reinforcing effects of Δ9-THC, nicotine, and ethanol, but also for preventing relapse to the use of various drugs of abuse, including cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin. In addition, environmental stimuli seem to be one of the major factors that can trigger relapse to drug use in abstinent drug abusers. This process is not only critical for psychostimulant abuse, but also for nicotine and heroin abuse, and probably for other drugs of abuse such as ethanol. By reducing the motivational effects of drug-related environmental stimuli, cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists might, therefore, provide an effective means for preventing relapse to drug-seeking behavior in abstinent drug abusers, providing a promising new tool for the treatment of dependence on a wide range of abused drugs.”

http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/312/3/875.long

The endocannabinoid system as a target for the treatment of cannabis dependence

“Cannabinoid replacement therapy and CB1 receptor antagonism are two potential treatments for cannabis dependence that are currently under investigation. However, abuse liability and adverse side effects may limit the scope of each of these approaches. A potential alternative stems from the recognition that (i) frequent cannabis use may cause an adaptive downregulation of brain endocannabinoid signaling, and (ii) that genetic traits that favor hyperactivity of the endocannabinoid system in humans may decrease susceptibility to cannabis dependence. These findings suggest in turn that pharmacological agents that elevate brain levels of the endocannabinoid neurotransmitters, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), might alleviate cannabis withdrawal and dependence. One such agent, the fatty-acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor URB597, selectively increases anandamide levels in the brain of rodents and primates. Preclinical studies show that URB597 produces analgesic, anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like effects in rodents, which are not accompanied by overt signs of abuse liability. In this article, we review evidence suggesting that (i) cannabis influences brain endocannabinoid signaling; and (ii) FAAH inhibitors such as URB597 might offer a possible therapeutic avenue for the treatment of cannabis withdrawal.”

“Direct modulation of CB1receptors as a treatment for cannabis dependence”

“Even though, as we have seen above, direct activation of CB1 receptors may yield variable behavioral responses, low-dosage oral Δ9-THC has shown promise in the management of human cannabis withdrawal. The rationale for this approach is that controlled replacement of Δ9-THC for smoked cannabis may reduce the severity of withdrawal symptoms and allow a dependent individual to remain abstinent. Additionally, given that dependent subjects are experienced with cannabis, and Δ9-THC is administered at low doses, administration of the latter is unlikely to result in the anxiety responses observed with inexperienced users or high dosages. Consistent with this idea, two independent clinical studies have shown that low-dose oral Δ9-THC attenuates withdrawal symptom scores and is minimally intoxicating in non-treatment seeking daily cannabis users.””

“Several therapeutic modalities are currently being considered to treat cannabis dependence, including activation or deactivation of CB1receptors. While these stategies show promise in measures of cannabis withdrawal and abstinence, they may also create problems of abuse liability or adverse emotional effects. An additional approach might be to enhance endogenous anandamide signaling using agents that attenuate the deactivation of this endocannabinoid transmitter.”

“Increasing anandamide signaling with deactivation inhibitors, such as the FAAH blocker URB597, potentiates stress coping behaviors in animals, indicating a role for anandamide in physiopathological context of stress-related responses. Similarly, elevation of anandamide in specific brain regions opposes the anhedonic effects of stress and promotes normal positive responses to pleasurable stimuli in rodents. It is reasonable to hypothesize that these effects could act to blunt the negative affect and stress, which is common during cannabis withdrawal, thus allowing cannabis dependent individuals to successfully abstain from drug use.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2647947/

Antiproliferative Effects of Cannabinoid Agonists on Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

“Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is characterized by chronic pain, hyperproliferation of endometriotic cells and fibrosis. Since cannabinoids are endowed with antiproliferative and antifibrotic properties, in addition to their psychogenic and analgesic effects, cannabinoid agonists have been evaluated in DIE both in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro effects of the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55212-2 were evaluated on primary endometriotic and endometrial stromal and epithelial cell lines extracted from patients with or without DIE. Cell proliferation was determined by thymidine incorporation and production of reactive oxygen species by spectrofluorometry. ERK and Akt pathways were studied by immunoblotting. Immunoblotting of α-smooth muscle actin was studied as evidence of myofibroblastic transformation. The in vivo effects of WIN 55212-2 were evaluated on Nude mice implanted with human deep infiltrating endometriotic nodules. The in vitro treatment of stromal endometriotic cells by WIN 55212-2 decreased cell proliferation, reactive oxygen species production, and α-smooth muscle actin expression. The decrease in cell proliferation induced by WIN 55212-2 was not associated with a decrease in ERK activation, but was associated with the inhibition of Akt activation. WIN 55212-2 abrogated the growth of endometriotic tissue implanted in Nude mice. Cannabinoid agonists exert anti-proliferative effects on stromal endometriotic cells linked to the inhibition of the Akt pathway. These beneficial effects of cannabinoid agonists on DIE have been confirmed in vivo.”

“The cannabinoids are well known for their psychogenic effects and their role in inflammation and immunity. They are also endowed with properties that can be used in the control of three major aspects of DIE: hyperproliferation, fibrosis, and chronic pain. Because of their implication in proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, the cannabinoids control cell growth. Their antiproliferative effects result from the inhibition of growth factors and the deregulation of such signaling pathways as Ras-Raf-MKKK1-ERK1/2, PI3K-Akt/PKB-mTOR and c-Jun N-terminal kinase-MAPK. These mechanisms have suggested new targets in cancer treatment and also in endometriosis, since endometriotic cells have a hyperproliferative phenotype and pro-angiogenic properties. In addition, several experimental studies have reported an antifibrotic role of cannabinoid agonists. If such antifibrotic effect of cannabinoid agonists could be demonstrated in DIE it would allow a less extensive surgery. Finally, cannabinoids have analgesic properties and have been used for a long time in treating chronic pain.

“Therefore, we have evaluated the effects of cannabinoid agonists in vitro on cells extracted from biopsies of deep infiltrating endometriosis and in vivo on a mouse model of endometriosis. We conclude from our data that cannabinoid agonists represent a promising approach in the treatment of DIE.”

“In conclusion, WIN 55212-2 has in vitro antiproliferative and antifibrotic effects in deep infiltrating endometriotic cells. The antiproliferative effect is linked to the inactivation of the Akt pathway. The effectiveness of WIN 55212-2 in vitro, confirmed in vivo in a mouse model of DIE, suggests that the cannabinoid agonists represent a promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of DIE.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993285/

 

A novel nonpsychotropic cannabinoid, HU-211, in the treatment of experimental pneumococcal meningitis.

Abstract

“Typical features of pneumococcal meningitis have been demonstrated in rats inoculated with Streptococcus pneumoniae. HU-211, a novel noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist recently demonstrated to inhibit tumor necrosis factor-alpha production under various conditions, improves recovery in some experimental models of brain injury. The present study tested the efficacy of HU-211 in combination with antimicrobial therapy in reducing brain damage in experimental pneumococcal meningitis. S. pneumoniae-infected rats were treated with saline alone, ceftriaxone alone, or with combination of ceftriaxone and HU-211 18 h after inoculation of the bacteria. Brain edema and blood-brain barrier impairment 48 h after infection were significantly (P<.05) reduced suggest that HU-211 when given concomitantly with antibiotics attenuates brain damage in the rat model of pneumococcal meningitis.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8627042