Category Archives: Endocannabinoid System

Computational and Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of GC-MS Profiled Cannabis sativa Inflorescence Extracts’ Metabolites on Selected Diabetes Therapeutic Targets

Posted on by

A new 2026 study found that Cannabis sativa flower extracts showed activity against several biological targets involved in diabetes. Researchers tested the extracts for effects on carbohydrate-digesting enzymes, glucose uptake and oxidative stress, then used computational modeling to examine how 36 cannabis metabolites interacted with diabetes-related proteins.

The hexane extract showed the strongest overall activity, including inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase and the greatest increase in glucose uptake in the yeast model. Glucose uptake with the hexane extract rose from 25% at 62.5 µg/mL to 54% at 500 µg/mL.

The docking analysis identified several cannabinoids — including Δ9-THC, 8-hydroxy-Δ9-THC, cannabivarin and tetrahydrocannabinol-7-oic acid — as promising candidates for further study against diabetes-related targets such as DPP-4, SGLT-2 and PTP1B. The authors concluded that cannabis inflorescences may be a promising source of compounds for future antidiabetic drug research.

“Cannabis sativa, a medicinal plant rich in cannabinoids, terpenoids, and flavonoids, has been shown to have various pharmacological activities.

This study investigated the antidiabetic potential of C. sativa inflorescence extracts using in vitro and computational models.

Dried C. sativa inflorescences were extracted sequentially with hexane, dichloromethane, and methanol, before their metabolites were identified by GC-MS. The extracts were tested for α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition, glucose uptake activity, and antioxidant effects using DPPH and nitric oxide (NO) inhibition assays. Thirty-six metabolites were further docked against diabetes-related proteins.

Among the extracts, the hexane extract showed the strongest bioactivity with notable α-amylase inhibition (IC50: 727 µg/mL), DPPH free radical scavenging (IC50: 478.62 µg/mL), and nitric oxide inhibition activity (IC50: 356.51 µg/mL). Docking analyses revealed strong binding affinities for 8-hydroxy-delta-9-THC, cannabivarin, and 9-tetrahydrocannabinol with DPP-4, PTP1B, and other target proteins.

These findings highlight the potential of C. sativa inflorescences as a source of antidiabetic agents, warranting further in vivo and clinical validation.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42763912

“This study provides preliminary evidence that C. sativa inflorescence extracts contain phytoconstituents with antioxidant, enzyme-inhibitory, and potential antidiabetic activities under the experimental conditions investigated. Among the extracts, the hexane extract exhibited the strongest enzyme inhibition and capacity to interact with free radicals.

In addition, compounds including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 8-hydroxy-Δ9-THC, cannabivarin, and tetrahydrocannabinol-7-oic acid exhibited favorable binding affinities toward diabetes-related protein targets, identifying them as promising candidates for further investigation.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbdv.71684

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol alleviates inflammation by modulating immune responses in LPS-induced murine inflammation model

Posted on by

Delta-9-THC reduced inflammatory immune signaling across human immune cells and a mouse model of systemic inflammation. In LPS-stimulated cells, THC markedly suppressed type I interferon-related genes and pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β and TNF-α, while also reducing immune-cell activation markers.

The effects extended beyond isolated cells. In mice exposed to systemic inflammation, THC reduced activation of splenic myeloid cells and T cells. Brain analysis also showed reduced neuroinflammatory signaling, including lower expression of inflammatory mediators, while pathways associated with neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity and neuronal function were enriched.

Importantly, the researchers describe THC’s effects as modulation rather than indiscriminate immune suppression, concluding that THC appears to dampen excessive inflammatory signaling while influencing cellular stress-adaptation pathways. They say these findings support further investigation of cannabinoid signaling in chronic inflammatory, neuroimmune and neurodegenerative disorders.

“Introduction: Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary psychoactive component of cannabis, has been reported to modulate immune responses; however, its effects on complex innate immune signaling pathways and inflammation remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the immunomodulatory effects of THC on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation across cellular and in vivo models.

Methods: We integrated transcriptomic, cellular, and in vivo approaches to characterize the effects of THC on innate immune activation. Human THP-1 monocytic cells were treated with THC in the presence or absence of LPS, followed by transcriptomic and gene expression analyses to evaluate inflammatory, type I interferon, unfolded protein response (UPR), and autophagy pathways. Findings were validated in primary human monocytes by assessing immune activation markers. The effects of chronic THC exposure were further evaluated in a murine model of systemic inflammation by examining splenic myeloid and T-cell activation. RNA sequencing of brain tissue was performed to assess the effects of THC on neuroinflammatory and neuronal pathways.

Results: THC induced a stress-adaptive transcriptional program in THP-1 cells, characterized by upregulation of genes associated with the UPR and autophagy pathways. In contrast, THC markedly suppressed LPS-induced type I interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β and TNF-α. In primary human monocytes, THC significantly reduced the expression of activation markers CD80, CD83, and CD209. Consistent with these findings, chronic THC exposure attenuated the activation of splenic myeloid and T cells in mice subjected to systemic inflammation. Brain transcriptomic analysis further demonstrated reduced expression of neuroinflammatory pathways following THC exposure, accompanied by enrichment of pathways associated with neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity.

Discussion: Our findings demonstrate that THC exerts broad immunomodulatory effects characterized by suppression of inflammatory and type I interferon responses while promoting cellular stress-adaptation pathways. These effects were observed across human monocytic cells, primary monocytes, and peripheral immune populations in vivo, and were accompanied by reduced neuroinflammatory signaling and increased neuronal plasticity-associated pathways in the brain. Together, these findings provide mechanistic insight into the immunomodulatory actions of THC and support further investigation of cannabinoid signaling as a potential regulator of chronic inflammatory and neuroimmune disorders.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42818626

“Chronic THC exposure reduces LPS-induced immune activation in vivo.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1856131/full

Need this THC study explained? thcXplained.com

(+)-Trans-Cannabidiol Is an Agonist at Human CB2 Receptors

Posted on by

A new 2026 study reports that (+)-trans-cannabidiol [(+)-CBD] acts as an agonist at human CB2 cannabinoid receptors, activating a major receptor of the endocannabinoid system involved in immune and inflammatory signaling.

Researchers found that (+)-CBD produced a strong, concentration-dependent CB2 response, reaching roughly 90% of the maximum effect produced by the reference cannabinoid agonist CP55940. Additional testing indicated that the compound acts through the receptor’s primary, or orthosteric, binding site.

The findings show that different molecular forms of cannabidiol can interact with cannabinoid receptors in very different ways. The researchers conclude that (+)-CBD may deserve further study in CB2-sensitive disease states, adding another layer to our understanding of how cannabinoid chemistry can influence the human endocannabinoid system.

“(-)-trans-Cannabidiol ((-)-CBD) is a principal phytocannabinoid from Cannabis sativa. (-)-CBD has complex pharmacology but is a relatively weak inhibitor of CB1 and CB2 receptor signaling. Cannabidiol has two chiral centres and thus four stereoisomers. (+)-trans-CBD ((+)-CBD) has a higher affinity than (-)-CBD at CB1 and CB2, but its pharmacodynamic effects at these receptors are incompletely described.

We examined the activity of (+)-CBD at human CB1 and CB2 receptors using a fluorescence-based assay of membrane potential in AtT20 cells stably expressing CB1 or CB2 receptors.

(+)-CBD produced a rapid, concentration-dependent hyperpolarization in CB2-expressing cells (pEC50 6.63 ± 0.08) with a maximal effect 90% of the response to CP55940. The CB2 response was blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment and competitively inhibited by the CB2 antagonist AM630 (Schild slope 1.1 ± 0.1). (+)-CBD was a low-efficacy, low-potency CB1 agonist and inhibited somatostatin-receptor effects at high concentrations (10-30 μM). (+)-CBD had no effect on the membrane potential of AtT20 wild-type cells. In silico modeling of ligand interactions with CB2 indicated that (+)-CBD but not (-)-CBD formed an H-bond with Ser285, a residue crucial for agonist activation of CB2.

Our data suggests (+)-CBD acted as a CB2 agonist via the orthosteric binding site on the receptor. Synthetic CBD, including (+)-CBD, has previously been administered in clinical trials, presumably without consideration of its potential CB2 agonist activity.

Given the relative safety of (-)-CBD in people, (+)-CBD may be a useful drug to explore CB2-sensitive disease states.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42745361

“This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the molecular actions of the enantiomers of chiral cannabinoids. Although the safety of (+)-CBD cannot simply be assumed to be the same as (−)-CBD, the identification of (+)-CBD as a robust CB2 agonist suggests that (+)-CBD may be worth exploring as a therapeutic agent in chronic inflammatory conditions or other diseases where CB2 activation may prove beneficial.”

https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prp2.70325

The Endocannabinoid System in Endometriosis-Associated Pain: Mechanisms, Molecular Targets, and Therapeutic Implications

Posted on by

A new 2026 review published in Reproductive Sciences examines the endocannabinoid system (ECS) as a therapeutic target for endometriosis-associated pain, a condition that can cause severe pelvic pain, painful menstruation, painful intercourse, and other chronic symptoms. The authors highlight the ECS because of its established roles in regulating pain, inflammation, and immune activity.

The review found that cannabinoids may influence three major mechanisms involved in endometriosis-associated pain: inflammation, pain signaling and sensitization, and the growth of endometriotic lesions. Cannabinoids interact with both cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid receptors found in endometriotic tissue, while also reducing inflammatory signaling from immune cells such as mast cells and macrophages.

The researchers conclude that the endocannabinoid system is a promising therapeutic target for endometriosis-associated pain, with cannabinoid therapies showing potential to regulate nociception, inflammation, and lesion proliferation. They call for clinical trials to further evaluate cannabinoid-based treatments for people living with endometriosis.

“Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological disorder affecting approximately 10% of reproductive-age women, characterized by the ectopic growth of endometrial tissue and severe pain, including dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysuria, and dyschezia. Current treatments are limited in efficacy and associated with significant side effects, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target, given its well-established roles in pain modulation, inflammation, and immune regulation. Epidemiological evidence demonstrates that women with endometriosis increasingly use cannabis for symptom self-management, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly characterized.

This review integrates preclinical and human evidence to comprehensively evaluate the mechanistic basis of cannabinoid efficacy in endometriosis-associated pain. Evidence from in vitro studies and animal models indicates that cannabinoids target three main mechanisms of endometriosis-associated pain, including inflammation, nociceptive signaling, and lesion proliferation.

Cannabinoids suppress pain signaling and sensitization by interacting with cannabinoid and non-cannabinoid receptors expressed in endometriotic lesions. Cannabinoids attenuate endometriosis-induced inflammation by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine signaling and reducing the release of inflammatory mediators by mast cells and peritoneal macrophages. Cannabinoids also exert antiproliferative effects in endometriosis models, thereby suppressing the growth of endometriotic lesions.

In conclusion, the ECS is a promising therapeutic target for endometriosis-associated pain, as it regulates nociception, inflammation, and proliferation. These promising findings highlight the potential therapeutic benefits of cannabinoids for endometriosis-associated pain, warranting the need for clinical trials to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cannabinoid therapies in endometriosis.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42745018

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43032-026-02201-9

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol treatment impairs CD8+ T cell differentiation into interferon gamma-competent CD45RO+ cells

Posted on by

New research published in The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics shows that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can alter the development of CD8+ T cells involved in inflammatory immune responses. Researchers found that THC reduced secretion of interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), three signaling molecules involved in immune activation and inflammation.

Rather than simply preventing cells from producing IFNγ, THC appeared to change how the T cells developed. THC reduced the differentiation of CD8+ T cells into mature CD45RO+ cells capable of secreting IFNγ. A selective CB2 receptor agonist produced similar effects, suggesting that activation of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor may play an important role in THC’s immune-modulating activity.

The researchers examined these effects partly because IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells contribute to persistent neuroinflammation associated with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. They concluded that reducing CD8+ T-cell-derived IFNγ in the central nervous system may potentially improve cognitive outcomes during HIV infection, while noting that the findings may also have relevance to other inflammatory diseases involving IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells.

“Chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection results in a persistent state of neuroinflammation, even with combined antiretroviral therapy. Neuroinflammation contributes to pathology termed HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder, which is exacerbated by interferon gamma (IFNγ)-producing CD8+ T cells in the central nervous system.

Many people living with HIV self-report using Cannabis sativa to mitigate symptoms of chronic infection and side effects of treatment. C. sativa is composed of various phytocannabinoids, including Δ9-tetrahydrocannbinol (THC), which possesses immune-modulating properties.

This study aims to determine whether C. sativa use by people living with HIV, and specifically THC, affects IFNγ secretion by CD8+ T cells.

We found that HIV status does not influence T cell IFNγ responses, and C sativa use modestly reduces the average secretion of IFNγ by CD8+ T cells from HIV+ donors. Treatment of CD8+ T cells with THC and the selective cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, JWH-015, reduced T-cell cytokine secretion, with THC eliciting greater suppression than cannabidiol.

These results suggest that THC treatment does not directly impair IFNγ gene expression or protein production, as determined by polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. However, THC treatment impaired CD8+ T cell differentiation into IFNγ-competent CD45RO+ cells.

These studies are of clinical relevance because reduction of CD8+ T-cell-derived IFNγ in the central nervous system may improve cognitive outcomes during HIV infection. Furthermore, these findings may be generalizable to other inflammatory diseases in which IFNγ-producing CD8+ T cells have been implicated.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Δ9-Tetrahydrocannbinol (THC) treatment reduces CD8+ T cell interferon gamma (IFNγ) secretion isolated from HIV- and HIV+ individuals. THC and the selective cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, JWH-015, both reduced CD8+ T cell secretion of IFNγ, interleukin 2, and tumor necrosis factor α, suggesting the involvement of cannabinoid receptor 2. Although THC treatment does not suppress IFNγ mRNA or protein levels, it reduces the number of IFNγ-secreting cells by impairing CD8+ T-cell differentiation into IFNγ-competent CD45RO+ cells.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42748512

https://jpet.aspetjournals.org/article/S0022-3565(26)01210-3/abstract

Need this THC study explained? thcXplained.com

Medical Cannabis and the Hallmarks of Cancer: A Critical Narrative Review

Posted on by

A 2026 critical narrative review examines medical cannabis through one of the most important frameworks in cancer biology: the hallmarks of cancer. Rather than looking only at symptom relief, the authors reviewed evidence for how cannabinoids, including THC and CBD, may interact with biological processes that allow cancer to develop, survive, grow and spread.

The review discusses cannabinoid effects involving cancer-cell proliferation, programmed cell death, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, tumor metabolism, immune responses and the tumor microenvironment. It also examines major cancer-related signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT, RAS/RAF/ERK, mTOR, EGFR, Wnt/β-catenin and p53.

Taken together, the research shows that cannabinoids can influence multiple hallmarks of cancer through several interconnected mechanisms. The authors describe the evidence as showing biologically plausible antitumor activity and highlight cannabinoids as an important area for continued cancer research and development.

“Cancer remains a highly complex and heterogeneous disease, causing major morbidity and mortality worldwide despite advances in diagnosis and treatment. The hallmarks of cancer enlighten the biological mechanisms supporting tumourigenesis and malignant evolution, while helping to identify potential therapeutic targets.

Medical cannabis has mostly been used in oncology for supportive care, but increasing preclinical evidence suggests interference with cancer-related signalling pathways.

This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on cannabinoids, in particular the phytocannabinoids cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), framing their prospective anticancer effects in the hallmarks of cancer.

Preclinical studies imply that CBD exerts antiproliferative effects by modulating oncogenic signalling pathways, including EGFR, PI3K/AKT, RAS/RAF/ERK, mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin, while also influencing tumour suppressor pathways involving p53, p21 and p27, causing cell cycle arrest. CBD has additionally been shown to promote programmed cell death via mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy, altering cancer metabolism as well. Furthermore, CBD has shown anti-invasive and antiangiogenic properties and also appears to modulate immune responses and interactions with the tumour microenvironment, including emerging links with the microbiome.

Overall, cannabinoids exhibit biologically plausible antitumour activity across multiple cancer hallmarks and may present promising candidates for combination therapeutic strategies.

Nonetheless, the current evidence remains predominantly preclinical, and robust translational studies and clinical trials are needed to clarify their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, determine their clinical efficacy and safety while assessing their potential integration into multimodal cancer treatment.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42737454/

“Cannabinoids have demonstrated biologically plausible promising antitumour effects by interacting with several cancer hallmarks, including tumour angiogenesis, resistance to programmed cell death, metastasis and invasion, as well as immune evasion and phenotypic plasticity.”

“Cannabinoids can interfere with several biological mechanisms involved in cancer development and progression and even though their role in oncology remains mostly supportive with predominance in symptom control, preclinical studies increasingly suggest that cannabis can also influence tumour biology.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/17/7549

The Endocannabinoid System is No Longer the Limiting Factor: Why Policy and Stigma Continue to Delay Cannabinoid-Based Medicine

Posted on by

The science of the endocannabinoid system has advanced dramatically, but cannabinoid-based medicine is still being held back by forces outside the laboratory. This new Clinical Therapeutics commentary argues that the biological understanding of the endocannabinoid system is no longer the main limiting factor. The larger barriers are now policy, regulation, funding, access, and stigma.

According to the authors, restrictive and fragmented rules make cannabinoid research harder to conduct, while limited access to standardized products complicates rigorous clinical trials. At the same time, stigma within medicine can discourage research, education, prescribing, and open discussion with patients.

The message is simple: the remaining evidence gaps are not purely scientific. They are also structural. If cannabinoid-based medicine is going to move forward, policy and medical culture will have to catch up with what researchers already understand about the endocannabinoid system.

“Purpose: To examine whether the persistent gap between the extensive mechanistic knowledge of the Endocannabinoid System (ECS) and the limited number of high-quality randomized clinical trials of cannabinoid-based therapies primarily reflects scientific uncertainty or, instead, structural regulatory, economic, and social barriers.

Methods: This commentary critically synthesizes historical, regulatory, and contemporary evidence on cannabinoid research, integrating data from regulatory documents, international policy reports, clinical and observational studies, systematic reviews, and qualitative investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on barriers affecting access to standardized products, conduct of randomized clinical trials, public funding, product standardization, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions.

Findings: Although the ECS has been extensively characterized for more than three decades and cannabinoids demonstrate plausible pharmacological mechanisms across multiple therapeutic areas, clinical translation remains disproportionately limited. Persistent regulatory restrictions, inherited from prohibition policies, continue to delay access to standardized research material, increase the cost and complexity of clinical trials, and shift evidence generation toward observational designs. Regulatory fragmentation further compromises product standardization and study reproducibility, whereas persistent social and professional stigma reduces research activity, medical education, prescribing confidence, and patient disclosure, perpetuating a self-reinforcing cycle between limited evidence generation and clinical distrust.

Implications: The principal obstacle to cannabinoid-based medicine is no longer the biological understanding of the ECS but the structural environment surrounding cannabinoid research. Progress toward evidence-based clinical implementation will depend on regulatory harmonization, greater public investment in randomized clinical research, standardized pharmaceutical-quality products, and educational initiatives capable of reducing stigma among healthcare professionals. Recognizing the structural rather than scientific origin of the evidence gap is essential for informing future research priorities, editorial policies, and international regulatory strategies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42728140

“The ECS is no longer the main obstacle to cannabinoid therapeutics. Stigma and regulation continue to delay clinical translation. Standardized clinical research requires international regulatory reform. Medical education is crucial for evidence-based cannabinoid therapies.”

https://www.clinicaltherapeutics.com/article/S0149-2918(26)00317-6/fulltext

Phytocannabinoids and bone health

Posted on by

A 2026 review published in Current Osteoporosis Reports examines growing evidence that phytocannabinoids may support bone health by influencing bone remodeling, inflammation, fracture healing, and bone loss.

The review highlights the endocannabinoid system as an important regulator of bone metabolism. Research involving CBD and THC shows that cannabinoids can affect osteoblasts, which build bone, and osteoclasts, which break bone down.

The review also discusses early human research showing that medical cannabis products containing THC and CBD reduced a blood marker associated with bone resorption. Together, the findings point to cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system as promising areas for further bone-health research.

“Purpose of the review: Phytocannabinoids have received attention for their therapeutic properties, however, it is unclear how they affect bone homeostasis. Additionally, increased use of cannabis and hemp-derived products have raised questions about their impact on musculoskeletal health. This review summarizes recent studies that investigate the impact of phytocannabinoids on bone.

Recent findings: The most well studied phytocannabinoid in relation to bone health is cannabidiol (CBD). In vitro data suggests CBD inhibits osteoclasts and promotes osteoblast activity. Rodent studies have demonstrated CBD may be useful for managing bone loss associated with osteoporosis and periodontitis, as well as reducing fracture pain and promoting healing. Recent studies suggest other phytocannabinoid isolates and extracts containing multiple phytocannabinoids have varying effects on bone. The first clinical study in this area reported that a medical cannabis product reduced markers of bone turnover in healthy adults. Cannabinoids bind to receptors in the endocannabinoid system which is involved in regulation of bone metabolism. Phytocannabinoids may improve bone health; however, additional work is required to determine factors such as the optimal dose, timing, and route of administration.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42709344

“Due to their diverse pharmacological properties, phytocannabinoids may have therapeutic value for bone-related disorders.”

 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11914-026-00982-1

Endocannabinoid system dysregulation in non-communicable diseases: Implications for skeletal muscle health

Posted on by

Researchers reviewing the endocannabinoid system across non-communicable diseases found that ECS dysregulation is common in multiple disease states and may contribute to associated skeletal muscle wasting. Preclinical evidence suggests that modulating endocannabinoid signaling could improve both disease-related symptoms and muscle degeneration, highlighting the ECS as a potentially important therapeutic target across chronic disease.

“Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and their associated skeletal muscle (SkM) degeneration substantially contribute to morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, the endocannabinoid system (ECS) is increasingly recognized as an important regulator of both NCD pathophysiology and SkM plasticity.

This narrative review summarizes the interplay between the ECS, NCDs and SkM degeneration – a potentially interesting triad that has not yet been comprehensively described, but may stimulate future research into the role of ECS-targeted interventions in the context of disease-associated SkM wasting. Therefore, we performed a narrative synthesis of (pre)clinical studies, focusing on alterations in ECS components (endocannabinoids, enzymes, receptors), the effects of ECS modulation (e.g. receptor (ant)agonism or enzyme inhibition), and SkM degeneration symptoms, across various (models of) NCDs. Additionally, the current literature on ECS modulation and SkM degeneration in non-disease models was summarized.

The main findings show that ECS composition is consistently altered in different NCDs, including obesity, cancer (cachexia), liver disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacological or genetic ECS modulation has been reported to improve several disease-related outcomes, e.g. insulin resistance, liver fibrosis and renal inflammation, predominantly in preclinical models.

These NCDs also exhibit hallmarks of SkM degeneration, including atrophy, impaired regeneration, inflammation, and weakness. Notably, ECS modulation could ameliorate SkM pathology in various preclinical myopathy models, raising the hypothesis of an ECS-disease-muscle axis. However, this hypothesis requires further validation, as studies directly evaluating ECS-based interventions in disease-associated SkM degeneration remain limited.

Future research should directly evaluate the existence of this potential ECS-disease-muscle axis by generating more (human) data on ECS modulation in the context of disease-associated muscle wasting.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42697445

“The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is dysregulated in different internal diseases.”

“The endocannabinoid system might be involved in disease-associated muscle wasting.”

“ECS modulation could improve preclinical symptoms of skeletal muscle degeneration.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556526002913?via%3Dihub

Transient CB2R modulation durably restricts breast cancer plasticity by stabilizing a luminal like cell identity

Posted on by

New breast cancer research suggests that brief modulation of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R), including with THC, may have lasting effects on tumor cell behavior. Researchers found reduced self-renewal, invasiveness, and tumor-initiating capacity, along with greater tamoxifen sensitivity and a durable shift toward a more stable luminal-like cell identity.

“Cancer cell plasticity enables therapy resistance and metastasis by allowing transitions between stem-like and differentiated states. Differentiation-based strategies aim to stabilize tumor cell identity, yet pharmacological approaches that induce durable lineage restriction remain limited.

Here, we show that transient modulation of cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R) durably restricts breast cancer cell plasticity by stabilizing a luminal-like cell state. Using patient-derived and murine tumor organoids, we demonstrate that brief, low-dose CB2R modulation reduces self-renewal, invasiveness and tumor-initiating capacity, while enhancing tamoxifen sensitivity and limiting the emergence of resistant phenotypes.

These effects persist under pro-dedifferentiation conditions, including TGFβ exposure, stromal co-culture, immune signaling and mechanical stress, and are maintained in vivo following orthotopic transplantation. RNA sequencing reveals a progressive transition from an early plastic state toward a stabilized luminal-like identity, supported by CUT&Tag profiling that uncovers chromatin remodeling associated with this stabilization.

Together, our findings redefine CB2R as a regulator of tumor cell state and establish transient CB2R modulation as a strategy to durably constrain breast cancer plasticity through differentiation-based therapy.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-026-10837-1

“Low-dose THC keeps breast cancer cells in tumor models from reverting to an aggressive state”

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-09-dose-thc-breast-cancer-cells.html