“Cannabis, or Marijuana, has been used for centuries for both symptomatic and prophylactic treatment of migraine. It was highly esteemed as a headache remedy by the most prominent physicians of the age between 1874 and 1942, remaining part of the Western pharmacopoeia for this indication even into the mid-twentieth century. Current ethnobotanical and anecdotal references continue to refer to its efficacy for this malady, while biochemical studies of THC and anandamide have provided a scientific basis for such treatment. The author believes that controlled clinical trials of Cannabis in acute migraine treatment are warranted.”
“Arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide, AEA) is believed to be the endogenous ligand of the cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors. CB(1) receptors have been found localized on fibers in the spinal trigeminal tract and spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Known behavioral effects of anandamide are antinociception, catalepsy, hypothermia, and depression of motor activity, similar to Delta(9)-tetrahydocannanbinol, the psychoactive constituent of cannabis. It may be a possible therapeutic target for migraine. In this study, we looked at the possible role of the CB(1) receptor in the trigeminovascular system, using intravital microscopy to study the effects of anandamide against various vasodilator agents. Anandamide was able to inhibit dural blood vessel dilation brought about by electrical stimulation by 50%, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) by 30%, capsaicin by 45%, and nitric oxide by 40%. CGRP(8-37) was also able to attenuate nitric oxide (NO)-induced dilation by 50%. The anandamide inhibition was reversed by the CB(1) receptor antagonist AM251. Anandamide also reduced the blood pressure changes caused by CGRP injection, this effect was not reversed by AM251. It would seem that anandamide acts both presynaptically, to prevent CGRP release from trigeminal sensory fibers, and postsynaptically to inhibit the CGRP-induced NO release in the smooth muscle of dural arteries. CB(1) receptors seem to be involved in the NO/CGRP relationship that exists in causing headache and dural blood vessel dilation. It also seems that some of the blood pressure changes caused by anandamide are mediated by a noncannabinoid receptor, as AM251 was unable to reverse these effects. It can be suggested that anandamide is tonically released to play some form of modulatory role in the trigeminovascular system.
The known behavioral effects of anandamide are similar to that of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive constituent of cannabis, being antinociception, catalepsy, hypothermia, and depression of motor activity (Dewey, 1986; Adams et al., 1998). Although there is a history of anecdotal evidence suggesting the use of cannabinoids is effective at reducing headache and providing other pain relief, its potential as an acute migraine treatment and even preventive has never been scientifically studied in animal studies or clinical trial (Russo, 1998). However, one anonymous standardized survey found that of those using cannabis medicinally, over 10% were using it to relieve headache or migraine (Schnelle et al., 1999). Although many aspects of the study are open to debate, such as the highly selected nature of patient group, it is nevertheless an interesting observation.”
“Co-administration of opioids and cannabinoids can enhance pain relief even when administered on different days. Repeated systemic administration of morphine has been shown to enhance the antinociceptive effect of tetrahydrocannbinol (THC) administered 12hours later, and repeated microinjection of the cannabinoid receptor agonist HU-210 into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAG) has been shown to enhance the antinociceptive effect of morphine administered one day later. The primary objective of the present study was to test the hypotheses that this cannabinoid/opioid interaction is bidirectional. Experiment 1 showed that microinjection of morphine into the ventrolateral PAG of male Sprague-Dawley rats twice daily for 2days enhanced the antinociceptive effect of HU-210 measured one day later. In Experiment 2, twice daily systemic injections of THC enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine administered one day later. These results complement the previously mentioned studies by showing that morphine and cannabinoid interactions are bidirectional and that the ventrolateral PAG plays an important role in this effect. In contrast to the PAG, repeated administration of HU-210 or the cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, into the RVM had a neurotoxic effect. Rats became ill following repeated cannabinoid administration whether given alone or with morphine. Presumably, this neurotoxic effect was caused by the high cannabinoid concentration following RVM microinjection because rats did not become ill following repeated systemic THC administration. These findings indicate that alternating opioid and cannabinoid treatment could produce a longer lasting and more potent analgesia than either compound given alone.”
“Most hallucinogens and cannabinoids fall into Federal Controlled Substances schedule 1, meaning they cannot be prescribed by practitioners, allegedly have no accepted medical use, and have a high abuse potential. The legal and regulatory status has inhibited clinical research on these substances such that there are no blinded studies from which to assess true efficacy. Despite such classification, hallucinogens and cannabinoids are used by patients with headache on occasion.
Cannabinoids in particular have a long history of use for headache and migraine before prohibition and are still used by patients as a migraine abortive.
Hallucinogens are being increasing used by cluster headache patients outside of physician recommendation mainly to abort a cluster period and to maintain quiescence for which there is considerable anecdotal success.”
“The endocannabinoid system consists of an array of endogenously produced bioactive lipids that activate cannabinoid receptors. Although the primary focus of endocannabinoid biology has been on neurological and psychiatric effects, recent work has revealed several important interactions between the endocannabinoid system and cancer. Several different types of cancer have abnormal regulation of the endocannabinoid system that contributes to cancer progression and correlates to clinical outcomes.
Modulation of the endocannabinoid system by pharmacological agents in various cancer types reveals that it can mediate antiproliferative and apoptotic effects by both cannabinoid receptor-dependent and -independent pathways. Selective agonists and antagonists of the cannabinoid receptors, inhibitors of endocannabinoid hydrolysis, and cannabinoid analogs have been utilized to probe the pathways involved in the effects of the endocannabinoid system on cancer cell apoptosis, proliferation, migration, adhesion, and invasion. The antiproliferative and apoptotic effects produced by some of these pharmacological probes reveal that the endocannabinoid system is a promising new target for the development of novel chemotherapeutics to treat cancer.”
Although there is a strong set of data in vitro, in cellular model systems, and in mouse model systems, there is a dearth of clinical data on the effects of cannabinoids in the treatment of cancer in humans. This fact is quite surprising considering the large library of compounds that have been developed and used to study the effects of cannabinoids on cancer in model systems.
Despite the lack of preclinical and clinical data, there is a strong agreement that pharmacological targeting of the endocannabinoid system is emerging as one of the most promising new methods for reducing the progression of cancer. In particular, combination therapy utilizing both traditional chemotherapeutics and molecules targeting the endocannabinoid system may be an excellent next generation treatment for cancer.”
“Endogenous arachidonic acid metabolites with properties similar to compounds of Cannabis sativa Linnaeus, the so-called endocannabinoids, have effects on various types of cancer. Although endocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids may have pro-proliferative effects, predominantly inhibitory effects on tumor growth, angiogenesis, migration and metastasis have been described. Remarkably, these effects may be selective for the cancer cells, while normal cells and tissues are spared. Such apparent tumor cell selectivity makes the endocannabinoid system an attractive potential target for cancer therapy. In this review we discuss various means by which the endocannabinoid system may be targeted in cancer and the current knowledge considering the regulation of the endocannabinoid system in malignancy.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18249558
“The medicinal properties of extracts from the hemp plant Cannabis sativa have been known for centuries but only in the 90s membrane receptors for the Cannabis major principle were discovered in mammalian cells. Later on the endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptors were identified and the term ‘endocannabinoid system’ was coined to indicate the complex signaling system of cannabinoid receptors, endogenous ligands and the enzymes responsible for their biosynthesis and inactivation.
The ‘endocannabinoid system’ is involved in a broad range of functions and in a growing number of pathological conditions.
There is increasing evidence that endocannabinoids are able to inhibit cancer cell growth in culture as well as in animal models.
Most work has focused on the role of endocannabinoids in regulating tumor cell growth and apoptosis and ongoing research is addressed to further dissect the precise mechanisms of cannabinoid antitumor action. However, endocannabinoids are now emerging as suppressors of angiogenesis and tumor spreading since they have been reported to inhibit angiogenesis, cell migration and metastasis in different types of cancer, pointing to a potential role of the endocannabinoid system as a target for a therapeutic approach of such malignant diseases.
The potential use of cannabinoids to retard tumor growth and spreading is even more appealing considering that they show a good safety profile, regarding toxicity, and are already used in cancer patients as palliatives to stimulate appetite and to prevent devastating effects such as nausea, vomiting and pain.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17342320
Researchers investigated whether THC could interfere with the growth and spread of aggressive non-small-cell lung cancer. Using human A549 and SW-1573 lung cancer cells, they found that THC inhibited epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced cancer-cell growth, migration and invasion. THC also disrupted several signaling pathways involved in cancer survival and movement, including ERK1/2, JNK1/2 and AKT.
The researchers then tested THC in mice implanted with human A549 lung cancer cells. Compared with control animals, THC-treated mice showed significant reductions in tumor growth and lung metastasis. Tumors from the THC-treated animals also showed reduced cell proliferation and blood-vessel formation. The authors concluded that cannabinoids such as THC should be further explored as potential therapeutic molecules for controlling the growth and metastasis of certain lung cancers
“Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the primary cannabinoid of marijuana and has been shown to either potentiate or inhibit tumor growth, depending on the type of cancer and its pathogenesis. Little is known about the activity of cannabinoids like THC on epidermal growth factor receptor-overexpressing lung cancers, which are often highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy.
In this study, we characterized the effects of THC on the EGF-induced growth and metastasis of human non-small cell lung cancer using the cell lines A549 and SW-1573 as in vitro models.
We found that these cells express the cannabinoid receptors CB(1) and CB(2), known targets for THC action, and that THC inhibited EGF-induced growth, chemotaxis and chemoinvasion.
Moreover, signaling studies indicated that THC may act by inhibiting the EGF-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK1/2 and AKT. THC also induced the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at tyrosine 397. Additionally, in in vivo studies in severe combined immunodeficient mice, there was significant inhibition of the subcutaneous tumor growth and lung metastasis of A549 cells in THC-treated animals as compared to vehicle-treated controls.
Tumor samples from THC-treated animals revealed antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects of THC.
Our study suggests that cannabinoids like THC should be explored as novel therapeutic molecules in controlling the growth and metastasis of certain lung cancers.”
“In recent years, cannabinoids (the active components of Cannabis sativa) and their derivatives have received considerable interest due to findings that they can affect the viability and invasiveness of a variety of different cancer cells. Moreover, in addition to their inhibitory effects on tumor growth and migration, angiogenesis and metastasis, the ability of these compounds to induce different pathways of cell death has been highlighted. Here, we review the most recent results generating interest in the field of death mechanisms induced by cannabinoids in cancer cells. In particular, we analyze the pathways triggered by cannabinoids to induce apoptosis or autophagy and investigate the interplay between the two processes. Overall, the results reported here suggest that the exploration of molecular mechanisms induced by cannabinoids in cancer cells can contribute to the development of safe and effective treatments in cancer therapy.”
“At long last, Dixie X the revolutionary hemp CBD powered wellness products from Dixie Elixirs & Edibles are now available for sale over the Internet at dixiex.com.
Medical Marijuana Inc. (OTC: MJNA), a leading hemp industry innovator, is pleased to announce a new on-line sales website for its Hemp-based Dixie X line of products: www.dixiex.comThis announcement supports the company’s large scale national launch of on-line sales of its Hemp-based Cannabidiol (CBD) enriched health and wellness Dixie X products.
According to the company, since Dixie X is manufactured from non-THC high CBD concentrate industrial Hemp it can be legally shipped to consumers in all 50 states in the U.S. as well as internationally.”
