“Background/Objectives: The expanding focus on novel therapeutic pathways for long-term pain relief has directed interest toward compounds obtained from Cannabis sativa. This study evaluated the antinociceptive potential of cannabigerol-enriched extract (CBG) in models of acute and chronic hypernociception, along with morphological outcomes.
Methods: Formalin and hot plate tests were used on male Swiss mice to assess acute oral antinociception. To the chronic pain model, 8-week-old male Wistar rats underwent spinal nerve ligation (SNL), and CBG was administered orally by gavage once daily for 14 days.
Results: CBG reduced nociceptive responses in the formalin test and hot plate tests, mainly at a dose of 30 mg/kg, showing antinociceptive activity. CBG attenuated SNL-induced thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity, accompanied by reduced microglial density and spinal morphological changes. Importantly, cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) signaling contributed to the antinociceptive effects of orally administered CBG, whereas cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R), Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) did not appear to play major roles under our experimental conditions.
Conclusions: Collectively, these findings support CBG as a promising alternative for chronic pain management.”
“In summary, our study provides robust evidence that CBG exerts potent antinociceptive effects across acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain models.
Collectively, these results highlight CBG as a promising candidate for pain management and support further translational studies.”
“Pain is one of the most pervasive health problems associated with a negative impact on thinking, mood, psychological, and social communication.
The medicinal plants and their derived compounds have recently attracted great interest as potential candidates for defeating pain because of their worldwide safety, availability, and affordability.
This review was constructed to summarize all in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials regarding plant-derived compounds’ analgesic and antinociceptive effects. Further, we focus on structural aspects, molecular mechanisms, and pharmacological effects. A literature survey was performed in “PubMed,” “Science Direct,” and “Google Scholar,” using the keywords “Pain, Analgesic activity, Flavonoids, Phenolics, Medicinal plants, Volatile oils, Tannins, Saponins, Alkaloids” to assess the activities of each compound.
The main natural compounds studied were flavonoids, alkaloids, phenolic acids, lignans, anthraquinones, and volatile oils. Different in vitro studies utilized nucleus pulposus cells, VK2/E6E7, End1/E6E7, and LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells to assess analgesic effects. The frequently defined animal models of analgesic activity included acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions, hot-plate test, tail-flick test, formalin test, complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced pain, and hind paw incisional surgery.
For the natural compounds described, the opioids, serotonergic, and cannabinoid receptors appeared to be the most promising targets for pain management. This review suggested a wealthy resource of natural compounds as analgesic and antinociceptive candidates for pharmacists and drug researchers to launch a new drug with promising efficacy and safety.”
“Cannabidiol (CBD) has been getting attention from the scientific community regarding its potential for the treatment of different conditions, such as epilepsy, anxiety, and pain.
This potential can be useful in clinical practice as an alternative or as an adjuvant alongside conventional therapeutic approaches; however, its mechanisms of action should be best described for its more effective application. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate whether the peripheral opioid system is involved in the analgesic mechanism of cannabidiol administered systemically for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Male Swiss mice were subjected to the sciatic constriction injury, and their nociceptive threshold was evaluated using the mechanical paw pressure test.
Cannabidiol 20 mg/Kg produced an antinociceptive effect. Bestatin (400 µg/paw), a selective aminopeptidase-N inhibitor, potentiates the intermediate analgesic response of CBD at the dose of 2 mg/Kg. Naloxone (50 µg/paw), a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, reversed the CBD-mediated analgesia. CTOP (5, 10, and 20 µg/paw) and naltrindole (30, 60, and 120 µg/paw), μ and Δ opioid receptor antagonists, but not norBNI (200 µg/paw), a κ opioid receptor antagonist, partially reversed the CBD analgesia.
Thus, our study shows that cannabidiol may induce activation of opioid receptors in the periphery as a part of its analgesic mechanism in neuropathic pain.”
“CDB induces the activation of µ and δ opioid receptors as a part of its analgesia mechanism, leading us to suggest a possible interaction between opioid and cannabinoid systems as a complementary mechanism for generating peripheral analgesia in neuropathic mice treated with cannabidiol.”
“Cannabis sativa root has traditionally been used to relieve pain and inflammation, but its pharmacological properties remain underexplored due to low levels of psychoactive cannabinoids.
This study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects of the ethyl acetate fraction of Cannabis sativa root (CSREA) using in vivo rodent pain models. Mice were subjected to formalin and acetic acid-induced nociceptive tests, while rats were evaluated using a carrageenan-induced paw edema model.
CSREA significantly reduced pain-related behaviors in both early (0-10 min) and late phases (15-30 min) of the formalin test and decreased writhing responses in the acetic acid model. Notably, CSREA also improved survival rates following acetic acid injection. Inflammatory markers, including IL-6 and IL-1β, were significantly lowered in serum.
Furthermore, CSREA suppressed paw edema and redness in the carrageenan-induced rat model, demonstrating dose-dependent anti-inflammatory efficacy comparable to diclofenac. CSREA also downregulated pain-related gene expression (SCN9A, ASIC1A, TACR1) and regulated key enzymes involved in endocannabinoid metabolism (FAAH, MAGL, DAGL), suggesting its role in the molecular modulation of pain pathways.
These effects are likely mediated via modulation of the endocannabinoid system, particularly by rebalancing the CB1R/CB2R ratio. The findings suggest that CSREA holds promise as a natural therapeutic agent for managing pain and inflammation and warrants further investigation into its molecular mechanisms and long-term effects.”
“This study provides evidence for the in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and underlying mechanism of CSREA in vitro. Our results from the formalin and writhing tests demonstrate that CSREA significantly reduced nociceptive pain-related behaviors and inflammatory cytokine levels indicating strong anti-nociceptive properties in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, CSREA markedly reduced paw edema in the carrageenan-induced rat model, suggesting its potential as a natural product with anti-inflammatory activity. These effects are likely mediated through modulation of the endocannabinoid system, particularly by altering cannabinoid levels as demonstrated in the in vitro model.”
“Introduction: Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of U.S. adults, imposing significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. Medical cannabis has emerged as a potential therapy, yet its impact on healthcare utilization remains unclear.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed administrative data from a telehealth platform providing medical cannabis certifications across 36 U.S. states. Patients were classified as cannabis-exposed if they had used cannabis in the past year, while unexposed patients had no prior cannabis use. Outcomes included self-reported urgent care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and quality of life (QoL), measured using the CDC’s Healthy Days measure. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation with SuperLearner estimated causal effects, adjusting for numerous covariates.
Results: Medical cannabis users exhibited significantly lower healthcare utilization. Specifically, exposure was associated with a 2.0 percentage point reduction in urgent care visits (95% CI: -0.036, -0.004), a 3.2 percentage point reduction in ED visits (95% CI: -0.051, -0.012) and fewer unhealthy days per month (-3.52 days, 95% CI: -4.28, -2.76). Hospitalization rates trended lower but were not statistically significant. Covariate balance and propensity score overlap indicated well-fitting models.
Conclusions: Medical cannabis use was associated with reduced healthcare utilization and improved self-reported QoL among chronic pain patients.”
“The findings of this study suggest, in line with existing research, that medical cannabis is likely an effective treatment option for patients with chronic pain. Moreover, we found that, in addition to an increase in QoL, medical cannabis exposure is associated with lower risk of urgent care and ED visits, when comparing patients who used medical cannabis for at least one year to cannabis-naïve patients. This underscores the potential for not only QoL gains associated with medical cannabis use, but also positive downstream effects on the healthcare system resulting from treatment.”
“Background: The efficacy of medical cannabis in alleviating pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet questions remain regarding the extent to which specific chemical compounds contribute to analgesia versus expectation-based (placebo) responses. Effective blinding is notoriously difficult in cannabis trials, complicating the identification of compound-specific effects.
Methods: In a prospective study of 329 chronic pain patients (40% females; aged 48.9 ± 15.5) prescribed medical cannabis, we examined whether the chemical composition of cannabis cultivars could predict treatment outcomes. We used a Random Forest classifier with nested cross-validation to assess the predictive value of demographics, clinical features, and approximately 200 chemical compounds. Model robustness was evaluated using six additional machine learning algorithms.
Results: Here we show that incorporating chemical composition markedly improves the prediction of pain relief (AUC = 0.63 ± 0.10) compared to models using only demographic and clinical features (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). This result is consistent across all models tested. While well-known cannabinoids such as THC and CBD provide limited predictive value, specific terpenoids, particularly α-Bisabolol and eucalyptol, emerge as key predictors of treatment response.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that pain relief can be predicted from cannabis chemical profiles that are unknown to patients, providing evidence for compound-specific therapeutic effects. These results highlight the importance of considering the full range of cannabis compounds when developing more precise and effective cannabis-based therapies for pain management.”
“Chronic pain affects millions of people, and many turn to medical cannabis for relief. However, scientists debate whether cannabis truly reduces pain or if patients feel better simply because they expect it to work (placebo effect). In this study, we looked at 329 people who used medical cannabis and analyzed the chemical makeup of their treatments. Using machine learning, we tested whether the specific chemicals in cannabis could predict who would get pain relief.
We found that patients’ pain improvement could be predicted from the chemical content of their cannabis, even though patients didn’t know what chemicals they were receiving. This suggests that cannabis provides real pain relief beyond just patient expectations.
These findings show that medical cannabis has genuine therapeutic effects for pain management.”
“In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, our study provides compelling evidence that the efficacy of MC in pain relief is not merely a placebo response but is strongly influenced by its diverse chemical composition. Our findings challenge the traditional focus on THC and CBD as the primary therapeutic agents in cannabis and highlight the importance of considering the full spectrum of chemical compounds present in MC. By embracing a more comprehensive approach to understanding MC’s therapeutic potential, we can work towards developing safer, more effective, and more precisely targeted treatments for the millions of individuals suffering from chronic pain worldwide.”
“The endocannabinoid system (eCBS) plays a crucial role in pain modulation through its components, including endocannabinoids, cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), and metabolic enzymes.
Recent research highlights the interaction between the eCBS and non-opioid analgesics, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and pyrazolones. These agents may enhance endogenous endocannabinoid levels or influence eCBS signaling pathways, providing a multifaceted approach to pain relief.
This review examines the pharmacological mechanisms underlying these interactions, focusing on the potential of non-opioid eCBS interactions, detailing synergistic effects that could improve analgesic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Additionally, we explore the therapeutic implications of co-administering non-opioid analgesics with eCBS modulators to create more effective pain management strategies.
The combined modulation of non-opioid pathways and the eCBS represents a promising treatment for acute and chronic pain, warranting further clinical investigation and translational research in this evolving field.”
“Emerging Therapeutic Strategies: The integration of non-opioid medications with eCBS modulators represents a novel approach in pain management strategies, aiming to minimize opioid use while maximizing therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles during chronic pain management.”
“Cannabis products used for pain typically contain Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in varied amounts, but data on the effects of specific cannabinoid formulations on different pain types are lacking.
This study used the carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain model to test oral Δ9-THC, CBD, or their combination on acute edema and pain hypersensitivity.
Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10-14 per sex/group) were pretreated (1 hour) with vehicle (sesame oil), Δ9-THC (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.), CBD (10, 30, 100 mg/kg, p.o.), or select doses of Δ9-THC + CBD combinations prior to an intraplantar λ-carrageenan injection into the hind paw.
The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketoprofen (10 and 20 mg/kg i.p.) or its vehicle (1:1:18 ethanol:Cremophor EL:saline [Millipor Sigma]) was administered to a separate group as a positive control. Measurements were conducted at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 hours after carrageenan injection. Carrageenan produced edema and hypersensitivity to radiant heat (hyperalgesia) and mechanical pressure (allodynia).
Δ9-THC alone sex- and dose-dependently decreased hyperalgesia and allodynia but not inflammation, with effects of Δ9-THC being greater in females than males, and the lowest Δ9-THC dose was proinflammatory in males. CBD alone did not affect pain sensitivity but had modest anti-inflammatory effects in males. Isobolographic and dose addition analyses indicated Δ9-THC + CBD was subadditive relative to Δ9-THC alone.
These data demonstrate that prophylactic oral Δ9-THC alleviates acute inflammatory pain with sex-dependent effects, and CBD diminishes Δ9-THC antinociception when combined.
The findings suggest oral Δ9-THC is superior to CBD or combined Δ9-THC + CBD for acute inflammatory pain.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Despite the popularity of cannabis for pain management, empirical data on how specific cannabinoid formulations affect acute inflammatory pain are limited. This study in rats found that pure Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) formulations were most effective at improving inflammatory pain compared to pure cannabidiol or Δ9-THC + cannabidiol combinations, and females were more sensitive than males to the antinociceptive effects of Δ9-THC.”
“Introduction: Chronic pain remains a challenge, with standard therapies often providing inadequate pain relief and causing undesirable side effects. Medicinal cannabis has emerged as promising alternative. This study assessed the impact of a cannabis hybrid extract on pain intensity and quality of life in daily clinical use.
Methods: ESCAPE was an observational study and included patients aged ≥ 18 years with chronic pain in Germany. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Cannamedical® Hybrid Cannabis Extract THC25:CBD25 on pain during four visits (V1-V4) in clinical practice, and key secondary objectives were pain interference and quality of life. Pain intensity was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire. Pain interference was evaluated with the BPI pain interference subscore, and quality of life-particularly physical and mental health-was assessed with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Additionally, patient and physician satisfaction with the extract was assessed.
Results: The study included 64 patients (50% female) with chronic pain (intention-to treat population; ITT). Cannabis-naïve patients of the ITT were defined as a subgroup and analyzed separately (N = 35). Mean (± SD) NRS-assessed pain intensity decreased during the study, in both the ITT (5.46 ± 1.73 at V1 vs. 3.37 ± 2.43 at V4) and in the cannabis-naïve subgroup (5.92 ± 1.34 at V1 vs. 2.37 ± 1.69 at V4). Mean pain interference subscore decreased between V1 and V4 for the ITT (5.39 ± 1.92 vs. 3.38 ± 2.46) and the cannabis-naïve group (5.68 ± 1.46 vs. 2.54 ± 1.99). Physical and mental health improved in both groups and high satisfaction with the hybrid cannabis extract was reported by patients and physicians.
Conclusion: Treatment with the Cannamedical® Hybrid Cannabis Extract THC25:CBD25 in daily clinical practice showed positive effects on patients’ pain and quality of life.”
“The aim of this work was to assess the effectiveness of full-spectrum cannabis (THC and CBD) extracts as adjuvants in the treatment of chronic pain. This is a prospective, open label, longitudinal study.
Major cannabinoids were analyzed in herbal preparations using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Subjects were included when chronic pain diagnosis criteria was met according to physicians’ diagnosis. A patient stratification protocol was developed using a visual analogue scale to measure pain, a numerical scale for life quality parameters and a self-administered health survey. Eighty-eight patients aged between 35 and 88 years were included.
A significant decrease in both pain and other life quality parameters was observed between time zero and subsequent time intervals, excepting the “appetite” variable.
Overall, 51 individuals reported a decrease in pain, 38 a decrease in anxiety and 48 in insomnia, with “decrease” defined as symptom reduction of 50% or more between the first and last consultation. In addition, 23 subjects reduced or discontinued other analgesics and/or anti-inflammatory drugs during the trial. Adverse effects were mild and reversible.
These results are consistent with previous studies, supporting effectiveness and safety of cannabis extracts as adjuvants in the treatment of chronic pain.”
