“Objectives: To describe the effectiveness and tolerability of cannabidiol (CBD) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).
Methods: Records of children with DRE who received CBD for at least six months were reviewed. Reduction in seizure frequency [complete (> 90%), partial (30-90%), no response (< 30%)], parent reported adverse effects and discontinuation of CBD, if any, were noted.
Results: Records of 50 children with DRE (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome 32, Dravet syndrome 4, and Tuberous sclerosis complex 2), mean (SD) age 7.8 (4.3) years were reviewed. Complete, partial, and no response to CBD was seen in 10, 18 and 14 children; 8 became seizure-free. Eight children discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy (n = 4), by increased adverse effects (n = 3) and aggravation of seizures (n = 1). Adverse effects were noted in 22 (44%), none required hospitalization.
Conclusion: Cannabidiol is a useful and safe add-on drug in children with DRE.”
“Background/Objectives: Diabetes mellitus is a growing global health concern, driving the exploration of new therapies like cannabidiol (CBD), which shows potential in improving insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, though its effects on glucose metabolism remain unclear. This study evaluates CBD’s dose-dependent effects on glycemia, insulin, and hepatic carbohydrate metabolism in diabetic rats.
Methods: The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) was performed in healthy rats to compare intragastric vs. intraperitoneal CBD (0.5, 5, 50 mg/kg). Diabetic rats were treated with intragastric CBD (25, 50, 100 mg/kg) or metformin (70 mg/kg) for 8 days. Blood glucose, insulin, lipid profiles, and key carbohydrate-metabolizing enzymes were analyzed.
Results: In the OGTT, intragastric CBD reduced glycemic AUC, with 50 mg/kg showing the strongest effect, while intraperitoneal CBD had no impact. In diabetic rats, metformin and 25 mg/kg CBD lowered blood glucose, but only CBD increased insulin. The 50 mg/kg dose caused the greatest glucose reduction and moderate insulin rise, while 100 mg/kg had no effect. At 25 mg/kg, CBD inhibited glucose-6-phosphatase and increased glucose-6-phosphate. The 50 mg/kg dose further suppressed gluconeogenic enzymes, reduced glycogen phosphorylase and liver glucose, and enhanced glucose-6-phosphate, showing the strongest metabolic effects. The 100 mg/kg dose increased hexokinase but had weaker metabolic effects. Metformin improved glucose utilization and glycogen storage. CBD at 25 and 50 mg/kg reduced triacylglycerols and increased HDL, while 100 mg/kg had no effect.
Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence of CBD’s antidiabetic potential, especially at 50 mg/kg, particularly through its modulation of glucose metabolism and tendency to regulate insulin levels.”
“Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder marked by persistent gastrointestinal inflammation and a spectrum of systemic effects, including extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) that impact the joints, skin, liver, and eyes. Conventional therapies primarily target intestinal inflammation, yet they frequently fail to ameliorate these systemic complications. Recent investigations have highlighted the complex interplay among the immune system, gut, and nervous system in IBD pathogenesis, thereby underscoring the need for innovative therapeutic approaches.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Keywords including “cannabinoids”, “endocannabinoid system”, “endocannabinoidome”, “inflammatory bowel disease”, and “extraintestinal manifestations” were used to identify peer-reviewed original research and review articles that explore the role of the endocannabinoidome (eCBome) in IBD.
Results: Emerging evidence suggests that eCBome-a network comprising lipid mediators, receptors (e.g., CB1, CB2, GPR55, GPR35, PPARα, TRPV1), and metabolic enzymes-plays a critical role in modulating immune responses, maintaining gut barrier integrity, and regulating systemic inflammation. Targeting eCBome not only improves intestinal inflammation but also appears to mitigate metabolic, neurological, and extraintestinal complications such as arthritis, liver dysfunction, and dermatological disorders.
Conclusions: Modulation of eCBome represents a promising strategy for comprehensive IBD management by addressing both local and systemic disease components. These findings advocate for further mechanistic studies to develop targeted interventions that leverage eCBome as a novel therapeutic avenue in IBD.”
“Extraintestinal manifestations of IBD pose a significant and diverse array of clinical challenges, significantly impacting patients’ lives and healthcare utilization. While conventional therapies primarily target gut inflammation, the endocannabinoidome emerges as a promising and versatile target for managing inflammatory, metabolic, and extraintestinal complications of IBD. Preliminary evidence highlights its therapeutic potential, but further research is essential to optimize clinical applications and ensure safety.”
“The endocannabinoid system is a complex communication system involved in maintaining homeostasis in various physiological processes, including metabolism, immune response, pain modulation, and neuroprotection. Endocannabinoids, mainly anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, are natural ligands of the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, which are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Their biosynthesis, degradation, and interaction with other signaling pathways play crucial roles in both health and disease. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the physiological and pathological roles of endocannabinoids, discusses their potential as therapeutic targets, and highlights recent advances in endocannabinoid-based treatments.”
“The endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in maintaining physiological balance and regulating functions such as pain perception, immune response, metabolism, and neurological processes . Due to the multifaceted biological actions of the components of the ECS, researchers are seeking agonists/antagonists of cannabinoid receptors or other kinds of compounds with potential applications in targeted pharmacotherapy aimed at the endocannabinoid system. Although plant-derived cannabinoids have long been used in medicine, there are increasing attempts to use synthetic compounds as ligands for cannabinoid receptors or modulators of enzymes involved in endocannabinoid metabolism. Rimonabant, a selective CB1 receptor antagonist, was registered in Europe for the treatment of obesity from 2006 to 2008, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome. However, the European Medicines Agency determined that the risks of using the drug outweighed its benefits due to the serious psychiatric side effects, including depression and suicidal thoughts. Several novel drugs targeting ECS are under investigation. Notable examples include endocannabinoid reuptake inhibitors (eCBRIs) such as SYT-510 (currently under development), which are designed to treat anxiety, mood, and traumatic stress disorders, and AM404, an active metabolite of paracetamol, which inhibits AEA uptake. The other group consists of inhibitors of enzymes degrading AEA (fatty acid amide hydrolase—FAAH) and 2-AG (monoacyloglycerol lipase—MAGL) being explored for their potential in treating anxiety and pain. Drugs that modulate ECS hold promise for a variety of therapeutic applications, including glucose metabolism, obesity, neuroprotection, psychiatric disorders, pain management, and inflammation control, also in the context of chronic diseases. Further studies are needed to fully understand the complexities of this system and develop safe, effective treatments.”
“Cannabinoids are biologically active substances acting via feedback-coupled CB1 and CB2 receptors. Their expression in myofibroblasts and liver endothelial cells is reported to be elevated in chronic liver diseases. The effect of CB1 receptor stimulation is to increase fibrosis and inflammatory activity in the liver by stimulating stellate cells, while activation of the CB2 receptor results in inhibition of fibrosis. Stimulation of the CB1 receptor may also lead to progression of liver steatosis and carcinogenesis. In end-stage liver disease, the endocannabinoid system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of encephalopathy and vascular effects, such as portal hypertension, splanchnic vasodilatation and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. It seems that interference in endocannabinoid transmission may serve as an attractive target for the development of hepatological drugs.”
“The Endocannabinoid System (ECS) plays a critical role in maintaining physiological homeostasis, influencing a range of processes such as neuroprotection, inflammation, energy metabolism, and immune responses.
Comprising cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2), endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), and the enzymes responsible for their synthesis and degradation, the ECS has attracted increasing attention in cancer research. Cannabinoid receptor activation has been associated with the regulation of cancer-related processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, suggesting that the ECS may have a role in tumor progression and cancer treatment.
Preclinical studies have shown that cannabinoids, through their interaction with CB1 and CB2 receptors, can inhibit tumor cell growth, induce programmed cell death, and suppress the formation of new blood vessels in various cancer models.
Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of ECS-targeted therapies remains in its early stages. The complexity of tumor heterogeneity, the variability in patient responses, and the challenges associated with the pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids are significant obstacles to the broader application of these findings in clinical settings.
This review provides an overview of the current understanding of the ECS’s involvement in cancer biology, focusing on key mechanisms by which it may influence carcinogenesis. Additionally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting the ECS in cancer treatment, while highlighting the limitations and uncertainties that need to be addressed through ongoing research.”
“Background/Objectives: Cannabis sativa has been utilized for medical purposes for thousands of years. It continues to be recognized as a plant with an extensive variety of medicinal and nutraceutical uses today. In this study, a chemical investigation of the flowers of C. sativa isolated by using a variety of chromatographic techniques led to the isolation of eleven compounds. These purified compounds were evaluated for antitumor activity against SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells.
Methods: The compounds were isolated by using chromatographic techniques. Their structures were identified by the examination of spectroscopic methods, including 1D (1H, 13C, and DEPT) and 2D (COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra and mass spectrum, together with the comparison to those reported previously in the literature. The evaluation of toxicity on SK-N-SH cells was performed by the MTT method.
Results: Eleven compounds were isolated from the flowers of C. sativa, including two new compounds, namely cannabielsoxa (1), 132-hydroxypheophorbide c ethyl ester (2), and six known cannabinoids (6–11), together with the first isolation of chlorin-type compounds: pyropheophorbide A (3), 132-hydroxypheophorbide b ethyl ester (4), and ligulariaphytin A (5) from this plant. The results also demonstrated that cannabinoid compounds had stronger inhibitory effects on neuroblastoma cells than chlorin-type compounds.
Conclusions: The evaluation of the biological activities of compounds showed that compounds 4–10 could be considered as the potential compounds for antitumor effects against neuroblastomas. This is also highlighted by using docking analysis. Additionally, the results of this study also suggest that these compounds have the potential to be developed into antineuroblastoma products.”
“This reinforces confidence that a cannabis extract enriched in cannabinoids has the potential to be a promising candidate for neuroblastoma treatment.”
“Background: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, posing significant challenges due to its heterogeneity and the emergence of drug resistance. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive compound derived from Cannabis sativa, has recently gained attention for its potential therapeutic effects in breast cancer.
Objective: This review aims to evaluate the antitumor effects of CBD in breast cancer treatment by synthesizing preclinical and clinical evidence, elucidating its mechanisms of action, and exploring its translational potential.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, using keywords such as “Cannabidiol,” “CBD,” “Breast Cancer,” “Therapeutic Agent,” and “Antitumor Effects.” A total of 1,191 articles were initially identified. After duplicate removal and eligibility screening, 34 studies published between 1998 and 2025 were selected, including in vitro, in vivo, and clinical investigations. Studies were assessed based on PRISMA recommendations, considering inclusion criteria such as CBD’s impact on apoptosis, cell proliferation, tumor progression, and molecular mechanisms.
Results: CBD demonstrated significant anticancer effects, including induction of apoptosis, inhibition of cell proliferation, suppression of metastasis, and modulation of the tumor microenvironment. Mechanistically, CBD modulates key pathways such as PI3K/Akt, mTOR, and PPARγ and interacts with CB1, CB2, and non-cannabinoid receptors. Preclinical studies showed CBD’s efficacy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), while limited clinical trials highlighted its potential as an adjunct to conventional therapies.
Conclusion: CBD offers a promising therapeutic approach for breast cancer, especially for aggressive subtypes like TNBC. However, challenges such as variability in study design, lack of standardized protocols, and limited clinical validation hinder its clinical application. Future research should focus on conducting robust clinical trials, identifying predictive biomarkers, and optimizing combinatorial therapies to integrate CBD into personalized cancer treatment strategies.”
“CBD holds significant promise as a complementary or standalone therapeutic agent in breast cancer treatment, particularly in TNBC, where conventional options are limited. However, clinical validation through well-designed trials, biomarker identification, and safety profiling remains imperative before widespread clinical adoption. Future studies should focus on optimizing combinatorial therapies, investigating long-term effects, and refining pharmacological formulations to bridge the gap between preclinical findings and clinical application. By addressing these challenges, CBD could potentially redefine breast cancer management strategies, offering a safer, more effective, and targeted approach to treatment.”
“Natural rewards such as food, mating, and social interaction are essential for survival and species preservation, and their regulation involves a complex interplay of motivational, cognitive, and emotional processes.
Over the past two decades, increasing attention has been directed toward the endocannabinoid system and its paracannabinoid counterpart as key modulators of these behaviors.
This review aims to provide an integrated overview of the roles played by the endocannabinoid and paracannabinoid systems in regulating natural reward-driven behaviors, focusing on feeding, reproductive behavior, and social interaction.
We highlight how the endocannabinoid system – mainly through CB1 receptor signaling – modulates central and peripheral circuits involved in energy homeostasis, reward processing, and emotional regulation. In parallel, we explore the role of paracannabinoids, such as oleoylethanolamide (OEA), palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and stearoylethanolamide (SEA), which act primarily via non-cannabinoid receptors and contribute to the regulation of appetite, sexual motivation, and social behavior.
Special attention is given to the relevance of these systems in the pathophysiology of obesity, eating disorders, sexual dysfunctions, and social impairments, as well as their potential as pharmacological targets.
Overall, the evidence discussed supports a broader conceptualization of endocannabinoid and paracannabinoid signaling as pivotal regulators of natural rewards and opens new avenues for the development of targeted interventions for motivational and reward-related disorders.”
“Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with poor hippocampal function and disrupted pattern recognition. Cannabis use is highly prevalent in individuals with PTSD, yet the impact on these cognitive functions is poorly understood. Participants (n = 111) with a range of PTSD symptoms with and without regular cannabis use completed the mnemonic similarity task. We hypothesized that regular use would be associated with alterations in pattern separation ability in individuals with PTSD symptoms. High PTSD symptoms were associated with reduced pattern separation performance in minimal users. Regular users with high PTSD symptoms showed greater pattern separation, but reduced pattern separation with low PTSD symptoms. These results suggest that regular cannabis use may disrupt pattern separation and similar hippocampal-dependent processes, while it may improve pattern separation in individuals with high PTSD symptoms. These cross-sectional results require longitudinal follow-up studies to evaluate the causal effects of regular cannabis use on cognitive function in PTSD.”
“The finding that regular cannabis use was associated with improved pattern separation ability in those reporting more severe PTSD symptoms was unexpected. One possible explanation for this observation is that the endocannabinoid system is altered by trauma exposure and in PTSD.”
