“Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects over half a billion people worldwide. Current pharmacologic treatments, comprising mainly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, offer limited efficacy and pose significant risks, warranting the development of tolerable, safe and effective alternatives.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial on adults with CLBP was designed to confirm the superior efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability of VER-01, a novel, standardized full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 L., over opioids. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive VER-01 or a range of commercially available opioids. After a 3-week titration, subjects underwent 24 weeks of treatment, followed by 2 weeks of wash-out. The primary endpoint was the relative risk of constipation occurrence after 27 weeks treatment. Secondary endpoints included changes in pain and sleep scores, determined using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), with key secondary endpoints defined for week 27.

Results: A total of 384 individuals were randomized to receive VER-01 (n = 192) or opioids (n = 192). Subjects receiving VER-01 were fourfold less likely to develop constipation than those receiving opioids (relative risk [RR] VER-01/opioids 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.69; p = 0.007) and threefold less likely to use laxatives (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.18-0.65; p < 0.001). Longitudinal analysis revealed that VER-01 was superior to opioids in terms of pain reduction over 6 months of treatment, although differences in secondary endpoints limited to week 27 alone were not significant. Throughout the 6 months of treatment, mean pain reduction was 2.50 NRS points with VER-01 versus 2.16 with opioids (mean difference [MD] 0.34; 95% CI 0.00-0.67; p = 0.048), and sleep improved by 2.52 points with VER-01 versus 2.07 with opioids (MD 0.45; 95% CI 0.11-0.79; p = 0.009). These benefits were particularly pronounced in participants with severe pain, with greater pain reduction (MD 0.58; 95% CI 0.01-1.15) and sleep improvement (MD 0.66, 95% CI 0.05-1.27) compared to opioids.

Conclusions: VER-01 demonstrated superiority over opioids in treating CLBP, both in terms of efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41028525/

“In summary, this study provides robust evidence that VER-01 offers better tolerability, as well as superior pain relief and sleep quality compared to opioids in patients with CLBP. These findings highlight its potential as a promising new pharmacological option within a multimodal treatment approach that could fundamentally shift the paradigm in the treatment of chronic pain.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40122-025-00773-z

“Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects over half a billion people worldwide. Current pharmacologic treatments offer limited efficacy and carry substantial risks, warranting the development of safe and effective alternatives.

This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of VER-01 in CLBP. It enrolled 820 adults with CLBP (VER-01, n = 394; placebo, n = 426) and included a double-blind 12-week treatment phase (phase A), a 6-month open-label extension (phase B), followed by either a 6-month continuation (phase C) or randomized withdrawal (phase D). The primary endpoint of phase A was a change in mean numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity, with a change in total neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) score as a key secondary endpoint in participants with a neuropathic pain component (PainDETECT > 18). The primary endpoint for phase D was time to treatment failure.

The study met its primary endpoint in phase A, with a mean pain reduction of -1.9 NRS points in the VER-01 group (mean difference (MD) versus placebo = -0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.9 to -0.3; P < 0.001). Pain further decreased to -2.9 NRS points in phase B, with effects sustained through phase C.

The study also met its key secondary endpoint of phase A, with a mean NPSI decrease of -14.4 (standard error, 3.3) points from baseline in the VER-01 arm (MD versus placebo = -7.3, 95% CI = -13.2 to -1.3; P = 0.017). Although phase D did not meet its primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.44-1.27; P = 0.288), pain increased significantly more with placebo upon withdrawal (MD = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.0-1.0; P = 0.034). In phase A, the incidence of adverse events-mostly mild to moderate and transient-was higher with VER-01 than with placebo (83.3% versus 67.3%; P < 0.001). VER-01 was well-tolerated, with no signs of dependence or withdrawal.

VER-01 shows potential as a new, safe and effective treatment for CLBP.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41023483/

“In conclusion, this phase 3 study provides robust evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of VER-01 in the treatment of CLBP.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-03977-0

“Background: Complex regional pain syndrome is characterized by severe, persistent pain. Emerging evidence suggests that cannabis-based medicinal products may represent a new therapeutic option. However, to date, no clinical studies have evaluated the effects of cannabis-based medicinal products in individuals with complex regional pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to assess changes in patient-reported outcome measures and the prevalence of adverse events associated with cannabis-based medicinal products prescribed for complex regional pain syndrome.

Methods: This case series assessed changes in patient-reported outcome measures over 6 months in complex regional pain syndrome patients enrolled in the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Adverse events were measured and graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results: A total of 64 patients were identified for inclusion. At baseline, pain severity measured by the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form was 6.69 ± 1.42. This improved at 1 (5.85 ± 1.73), 3 (5.91 ± 1.82), and 6 months (6.05 ± 1.72; p < 0.050). Participants also reported improvements in severity as measured by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 and pain visual analogue scale at the same time points (p < 0.050). Participants also reported improvements in anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, and general health-related quality of life (p < 0.050), as measured by validated measures. Five patients (7.81%) reported 50 (78.13%) adverse events.

Discussion: This study represents the outcomes in individuals with complex regional pain syndrome prescribed cannabis-based medicinal products. These suggest initiation of cannabis-based medicinal products is associated with improvements in patient-reported outcome measures. While these findings are consistent with the literature, they must be interpreted with caution, considering the limitations of this study.

Conclusion: Cannabis-based medicinal products were associated with improvements in pain severity and interference. Participants also reported improvements in important metrics of health-related quality of life. This supports further research through high-quality randomized controlled trials to ascertain the efficacy of cannabis-based medicinal products in improving complex regional pain syndrome symptoms.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40898690/

“In conclusion, the results imply that initiation of CBMPs was associated with improved pain relief and health-related quality of life in complex regional pain syndrome patients.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70823

“Cannabinoids are increasingly being used to manage pain resulting from a variety of conditions.

Both preclinical animal models and human studies have played a crucial role in advancing our knowledge of cannabinoids, their involvement in pain mechanisms, and their potential utility as novel analgesics.

This chapter first reviews basic pain neurobiology and the most common experimental pain paradigms, which provide a basis for our discussion of preclinical, human laboratory, and clinical research characterizing the effectiveness of cannabinoids for managing pain.

While a substantial body of literature exists describing these effects, findings are complex and largely mixed, dependent on the cannabinoid administered, route of administration, and pain modality/syndrome tested. Herein, we highlight the need for more rigorous, placebo-controlled research defining the therapeutic efficacy of cannabinoids.

The chapter concludes by emphasizing the need for further investigation of other cannabis constituents (e.g., minor cannabinoids and terpenes), potential interactions between cannabinoids and other analgesic medications, as well as other emerging issues in the intersection between cannabinoids and pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40877567/

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/7854_2025_604