“In recent years, and even more since its legalization in several jurisdictions, cannabis and the endocannabinoid system have received an increasing amount of interest related to their potential exploitation in clinical settings.
Cannabinoids have been suggested and shown to be effective in the treatment of various conditions.
In cancer, the endocannabinoid system is altered in numerous types of tumours and can relate to cancer prognosis and disease outcome. Additionally, cannabinoids display anticancer effects in several models by suppressing the proliferation, migration and/or invasion of cancer cells, as well as tumour angiogenesis.
Along with cannabinoids, cannabis contains several other compounds that have also been shown to exert anti-tumorigenic actions.”
“Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system has been implicated in several diseases, including cancer.”
“Based on the preliminary evidence in various models, it appears that cannabinoids target key signaling pathways involved in all the hallmarks of cancer. Additionally to the cannabinoids, a large number of terpenes and flavonoids, some of them also present in cannabis, exhibit cytotoxicity against a variety of cancers.”
“Considering all the available literature at this time, much stronger experimental evidence (obtained in vitro, in vivo and even in a few clinical trials) support that THC and cannabidiol (CBD) have better anticancer activity than for the other cannabinoids.”
“Importance: Agitation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a great source of distress for patients and caregivers and a major public health burden. Current treatments are only modestly effective and many have safety issues including mortality risk. Novel therapeutic options are needed.
There is preliminary evidence for the safety and efficacy of dronabinol (tetrahydrocannabinol, THC) for agitation in AD.
Objective: Assess the safety and efficacy of dronabinol (THC) to decrease agitation in AD.
Design: THC-AD was a 3-week randomized parallel double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, conducted between 2017 and 2024.
Setting: 5 inpatient and outpatient academic clinical research centers in the Eastern U.S.
Participants: Volunteer sample of 75 participants meeting inclusion criteria for agitation of AD (International Psychogeriatric Association Provision Criteria) with Neuropsychiatric Inventory Clinician Version Agitation or Aggression (NPI-C A/A) domains total score of 4 or greater. Major exclusion criteria included seizure disorder, delirium, and non-AD dementia.
Interventions: 3 weeks dronabinol vs. placebo titrated up to target dose of 10 mg daily in divided twice-daily.
Main outcomes and measures: Prespecified co-primary agitation outcomes were the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS) and NPI-C A/A total score.
Results: The majority of participants were female and were taking concomitant psychotropic medications (antidepressants and antipsychotics) at baseline. Study participants were moderately agitated at baseline, were diverse in ethnic background (9% Black, 11% Hispanic/Latina/Latino), and had severe cognitive impairment evidenced by MMSE or SIB-8. 84% completed the 3-week trial.
Dronabinol decreased agitation on both primary outcomes greater than placebo to a clinically relevant extent. The fitted between-arm difference in PAS decline/week was -0.74 (SE 0.3, p = 0.015, effect size = 0.53) and for NPI-C A/A the decline was not significant at -1.26 (SE 0.67, p = 0.094, effect size = 0.36). No secondary outcomes differed between treatment arms including sleep, activities of daily living, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), cognition, intoxication, or use of ‘as-needed’ lorazepam or trazodone. Dronabinol treatment was not associated with greater intoxication nor with other adverse events (AEs) except for somnolence.
Conclusions and relevance: Adjunctive dronabinol treatment was safe and effective for treating agitation in AD.”
•What is the primary question addressed by this study?
Is dronabinol (synthetic THC) a safe and effective treatment for reducing agitation in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease?
•What is the main finding of this study?
In a 3-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 75 participants with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease, dronabinol significantly reduced agitation as measured by the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (effect size = 0.53) and showed a trend toward improvement on the NPI-C Agitation/Aggression domain. The medication was well tolerated, with somnolence as the only notable side effect and no increased risk of delirium, falls, or intoxication.
•What is the meaning of the finding?
These results suggest that dronabinol may be a relatively safe and effective pharmacologic option for managing agitation in Alzheimer’s disease.”
“Introduction: Cannabinoids are a group of terpenophenolic compounds derived from the Cannabis sativa L. plant. There is a growing body of evidence from cell culture and animal studies in support of cannabinoids possessing anticancer properties.
Method: A database search of peer reviewed articles published in English as full texts between January 1970 and April 2021 in Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science was undertaken. References of relevant literature were searched to identify additional studies to construct a narrative literature review of oncological effects of cannabinoids in pre-clinical and clinical studies in various cancer types.
Results: Phyto-, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids demonstrated antitumour effects both in vitro and in vivo. However, these effects are dependent on cancer type, the concentration and preparation of the cannabinoid and the abundance of receptor targets. The mechanism of action of synthetic cannabinoids, (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) has mainly been described via the traditional cannabinoid receptors; CB1 and CB2, but reports have also indicated evidence of activity through GPR55, TRPM8 and other ion channels including TRPA1, TRPV1 and TRPV2.
Conclusion: Cannabinoids have shown to be efficacious both as a single agent and in combination with antineoplastic drugs. These effects have occurred through various receptors and ligands and modulation of signalling pathways involved in hallmarks of cancer pathology. There is a need for further studies to characterise its mode of action at the molecular level and to delineate efficacious dosage and route of administration in addition to synergistic regimes.”
“Since time immemorial, the Cannabis plant has been used as a source of fibre, herbal remedy, medicinal and for religious purposes. Plant-based, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid compounds have shown merits in not only alleviating the unwanted side effects of antineoplastic drug regiments, but have also shown promising evidence in decreasing tumour burden.”
“Plant-based, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid compounds have shown merits in not only alleviating the unwanted side effects of antineoplastic drug regiments, but have also shown promising evidence in decreasing tumour burden, and one in vivo study so far concludes increasing survival rates in mice.
The antitumour effects of cannabinoids trend in modulating processes which include apoptosis and autophagy through first stimulating de novo synthesis of ceramide which induces activation of ER stress-related signalling proteins further leading to the inhibition of the AKT/mTORC1 axis promoting cell cycle arrest and additional mechanisms, such as cell death and aging.
Other pathways involved mechanistically are activation of MAPK/ERK signalling through calcium induction. Strategies that would optimize the anticancer effects of cannabinoids through interference of these signalling cross-talks may prove useful for therapeutic intervention. Nevertheless, we found that these effects were reached differently downstream depending on the type of cancer, the dosage of the compound and which receptor/ligands were activated.
We also found the co-administration of cannabinoids with chemotherapy drugs enhanced the potency of these effects. These synergistic effects should be targeted for translation to clinical application, especially in cancers which are refractory to chemotherapy.
Various extracted forms of cannabinoids from C. sativa have shown varying cytotoxic effects which should be explored in more detail in future studies as majority of the evidence originates from studies investigating mainly ∆9-THC and CBD’s actions. Whilst the emerging evidence of phytocannabinoid anticancer effects are promising, there remains a paucity of clinical evaluation which must be overcome.”
“Substantial preclinical evidence demonstrates the antiproliferative, cytotoxic, and antimetastatic properties of plant-derived cannabinoids (phytocannabinoids) such as cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol. The cumulative body of research into the intracellular mechanisms and phenotypic effects of these compounds supports a logical, judicious progression to large-scale phase II/III clinical trials in certain cancer types to truly assess the efficacy of phytocannabinoids as anticancer agents.”
“delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) was studied for potential carcinogenicity in rodents because it is the principal psychoactive ingredient in marihuana and it has potential medicinal uses.
There was no evidence that delta 9-THC was carcinogenic in rats or mice.”
“This paper presents a shared perspective from scientists and clinicians seeking to harness the therapeutic potential of cannabis while addressing Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) through reproducible scientific findings.
Rather than blocking CNR1 receptors, which may induce hypodopaminergia, we propose a pro-dopaminergic strategy using a natural nutraceutical formulation designed to enhance dopamine release and upregulate D2 receptor mRNA, thereby increasing D2 receptor density.
Given the failure of CNR1 antagonists such as Rimonabant, we argue for an opposite approach: restoring dopamine balance through CNR1 stimulation rather than inhibition.”
“Background: Alcohol use among women varies by age, with younger women more likely to binge drink and older women more often engaging in consistent, long-term consumption. Both groups face health risks, including chronic disease, mental health conditions, and sleep disturbance. Cannabis has been proposed as a harm reduction substitute for alcohol because of its lower risks of dependency and health harms. The aims of this study are (a) to identify differences between younger and older women regarding their choices to use cannabis products as a substitute for alcohol and (b) to explore multiple drivers (sleep, stress, health state, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and severity of alcohol use) behind the choice to replace alcohol with cannabis.
Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 413 women aged 18 years and above who reported lifetime cannabis use. Participants were stratified into younger (<56 years) and older (≥56 years) groups. Measures included sociodemographics, cannabis substitution behaviors (cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or both), self-rated health, sleep and stress difficulties, and validated scales: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD-4), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). Group differences were tested using chi-square and t-tests, and logistic regression identified predictors of substitution.
Results: Younger women (mean age 44.2 years) were significantly more likely than older women (mean age 62.9 years) to substitute THC for alcohol (14.0% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.019) and reported higher rates of sleep problems (52.5% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.007) and stress-coping difficulties (37% vs. 27%, p = 0.013). They also scored higher on AUDIT, PTSD, GAD, and PHQ instruments (all p < 0.01). Older women were more likely not to substitute cannabis for alcohol (83.5% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.002). Regression analyses showed that younger women with poorer health (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and higher AUDIT scores (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14) were more likely to substitute both CBD and THC. Sleep problems strongly predicted THC substitution in younger women (OR = 5.82, 95% CI: 1.58-21.45). Among older women, PTSD symptoms predicted substitution of both CBD and THC (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.55), and sleep problems predicted THC substitution (OR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.00-9.32).
Conclusions: Age-related differences emerged in women’s substitution of cannabis for alcohol. Younger women more frequently substituted THC and were influenced by alcohol severity, poor health, and sleep disturbance, whereas older women substituted less often, with PTSD and sleep difficulties as key predictors. These findings underscore cannabis substitution as a nuanced harm reduction strategy that requires age-specific approaches.”
“This study explored cannabis substitution as a potential harm reduction strategy, and its findings may inform prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing alcohol-related harms and improving women’s health outcomes.”
“Cannabinoids are multitarget substances. Currently available are dronabinol (synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, THC), synthetic cannabidiol (CBD) the respective substances isolated and purified from cannabis, a refined extract, nabiximols (THC:CBD = 1.08:1.00); and nabilone, which is also synthetic and has properties that are very similar to those of THC.
Cannabinoids have a role in the treatment of cancer as palliative interventions against nausea, vomiting, pain, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. THC and nabilone are also used for anorexia and weight loss, whereas CBD has no orexigenic effect. The psychotropic effects of THC and nabilone, although often undesirable, can improve mood when administered in low doses. CBD has no psychotropic effects; it is anxiolytic and antidepressive.
Of particular interest are glioma studies in animals where relatively high doses of CBD and THC demonstrated significant regression of tumor volumes (approximately 50% to 95% and even complete eradication in rare cases). Concomitant treatment with X-rays or temozolomide enhanced activity further.
Similarly, a combination of THC with CBD showed synergistic effects. Although many questions, such as on optimized treatment schedules, are still unresolved, today’s scientific results suggest that cannabinoids could play an important role in palliative care of brain tumor patients.”
“For medicinal use, evidence goes back 5000 years to the Chinese emperor Chen Nung. Archeological findings suggest that palliative cancer treatment with cannabis was already in use 2500 years ago.”
“Cannabinoids Can be Used in Palliative Care for a Wide Range of Symptoms.”
“Cannabinoids Reduce Nausea and Vomiting.”
“Increase of Appetite and Weight is Only Seen with CB1 Agonists such as THC.”
“Cannabinoids Moderately but Consistently Improve Chronic Pain.”
“Cannabinoids Demonstrate Antitumor Effects on Glioma Cells.”
“Cannabinoids are Highly Effective in Animal Glioma Models.”
“Anticancer Effects of Cannabinoids may be able to Prolong Life.”
“Funded by the National Institutes of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, the study found instead that THC slowed the growth of 3 kinds of cancer in mice—lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia. The US Drug Enforcement Agency quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research even though the researchers demonstrated remarkable antitumor effects.”
“Background: In light of the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, it is imperative to investigate new sources, and plants offer a promising supply of bioactive chemicals. Because of its numerous uses in industry, health, and nutrition as well as its antibacterial qualities, Cannabis sativa (C.sativa) has garnered a lot of study interest. This study sought to determine whether ethanolic extracts from C.sativa leaves have antibacterial properties against six human pathogenic microorganisms.
Methodology: The antibacterial activity of C.sativa ethanolic extract was tested against six bacteria according to design of experiments made by Agar diffusion method accompanied by response surface method (RSM) of Minitab 17 software. The different combinations set were, concentration: 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0, pH: 5.0, 6.5, 8.0 and temperature: 35°C, 37.5°C, 40°C. By using RSM, maximum antibacterial activity has been checked for ethanolic extract of C.sativa against six bacteria by choosing three independent variables, temperature, pH, and concentration. In in-Silico studies, homology, threading approach, structure prediction, ligands designing and docking studies was performed against the antimicrobial target sequences for Beta-Lactamase, GABA Receptor, Lipoteichoic Acid, N-Acetylglucosamine (NAG), Peptidoglycan and Topoisomerase-IV through FASTA format from UniProt for structure prediction.
Results: The results indicated that the three concentrations were effective against tested bacteria. Moreover, effect of pH caused a significant variation in zone of inhibition. The graphs presented in this study indicate the highest zone of inhibition for plant extract; have been achieved at concentration of 10.0, pH 5.1 and temperature 37.5°C. It shows that by keeping the pH low, antibacterial activity will increase. Through the multiple regression analysis on the experimental data, the fitted regression model for the response variable and the test variable x1, x2, x3 are correlated by the second order polymeric equation.
Conclusion: It has been concluded that C.sativa can be considered as an effective drug in curing diseases caused by bacteria. Using the optimized values of temperature and pH analyzed in this experiment.”
“Humans have been employing C.sativa since ancient times, and numerous historians have recorded multiple uses of this plant abroad. This plant has been cultivated for religious and recreational purposes, as well as for food, fiber, and oil, according to recorded history. C.sativa is also used therapeutically to treat depression, inflammation, and chronic pain, according to numerous ethnobotanical surveys.”
“This study is the continuation of the research to examine the effectiveness of ethanolic extracts made from C. sativa leaves against harmful microorganisms in humans. The results show that this extract has strong antibacterial activity against a variety of pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus which is affected more strongly by the pH and temperature variations rather than the concentrations of the extract. Moreover, it is confirmed by the application of the RSM model which indicates its activity. The zones of inhibition produced in the repetitive study has been concluded that C. sativa may be qualified as the drug of the future that can be efficacious for combating bacterial infections. The said plant is of high importance to synthesize a very high potency antibacterial drug by using the optimized ranges of temperature and pH.”
“Introduction: The endocannabinoid system plays a role in sleep-wake regulation. In clinical practice, people with central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) frequently report use of cannabis.
Methods: We compared lifetime and current use of cannabis of people with CDH to the Dutch general population. Additionally, we assessed cannabis use in relation to hypersomnolence symptoms.
Results: In total, 76 (out of 88) patients completed the online questionnaire. Lifetime cannabis use (42% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) and current use (18% vs. 4%, p < 0.001) were higher in people with CDH compared to the Dutch general population. For 57% of patients currently using cannabis, improvements of at least one CDH symptom were the motivation for use. Additionally, 79% of current cannabis users reported cannabis-related effects on a symptom, which were mostly positive (43%), some negative (7%), or mixed effects (29%). Patients that stopped using mostly started using cannabis before symptom onset and for recreational purposes. The most reported reasons to stop using were disadvantages of using or changes in the social environment.
Conclusion: This study provides a rationale for future research on the potential benefits of cannabis in CDH.”
