Category Archives: Endocannabinoid System

The Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Protects Against Alcoholic Liver Disease Via a Macrophage Autophagy-Dependent Pathway.

Posted on by

“Kupffer cells, the resident macrophages of the liver, play a major role in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease. We have previously demonstrated that CB2 receptor protects against alcoholic liver disease by inhibiting alcohol-induced inflammation and steatosis via the regulation of Kupffer cell activation.

Here, we explored the mechanism underlying these effects and hypothesized that the anti-inflammatory properties of CB2 receptor in Kupffer cells rely on activation of autophagy.

Altogether these results demonstrate that CB2 receptor activation in macrophages protects from alcohol-induced steatosis by inhibiting hepatic inflammation through an autophagy-dependent pathway.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27346657

Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Binding in Brain of Cannabis Users: Imaging With the Novel Radiotracer [11C]CURB.

Posted on by

“One of the major mechanisms for terminating the actions of the endocannabinoid anandamide is hydrolysis by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), and inhibitors of the enzyme were suggested as potential treatment for human cannabis dependence.

In cannabis users, FAAH binding was significantly lower by 14%-20% across the brain regions examined than in matched control subjects.

Lower FAAH binding levels in the brain may be a consequence of chronic and recent cannabis exposure and could contribute to cannabis withdrawal. This effect should be considered in the development of novel treatment strategies for cannabis use disorder that target FAAH and endocannabinoids.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27345297

Dissecting the signaling pathways involved in the crosstalk between mGlu5 and CB1 receptors.

Posted on by

“The metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor 5 and the cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptor are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that are widely expressed in the central nervous system (CNS). mGlu5 receptors, present at the postsynaptic site, are coupled to Gαq/11 proteins and display an excitatory response upon activation, while the CB1 receptor, mainly present at presynaptic terminals, is coupled to the Gi/o protein and triggers an inhibitory response. Recent studies suggest that the glutamatergic and endocannabinoid systems exhibit a functional interaction to modulate several neural processes. In this review we discuss possible mechanisms involved in this crosstalk and its relationship with physiological and pathological conditions, including nociception, addiction and fragil X syndrome.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338080

Anatomical characterization of the cannabinoid cb1 receptor in cell type-specific mutant mouse rescue models.

Posted on by

“Type-1 cannabinoid (CB1 ) receptors are widely distributed in the brain. Their physiological roles depend on their distribution pattern that differs remarkably among cell types. Hence, subcellular compartments with little but functional relevant CB1 receptors can be overlooked, fostering an incomplete mapping. To overcome this, knock-in mice with cell-type specific rescue of CB1 receptors have emerged as excellent tools to investigate its cell type-specific localization and sufficient functional role with no bias.

However, to know whether these rescue mice maintain endogenous CB1 receptor expression level, detailed anatomical studies are called for. The subcellular distribution of hippocampal CB1 receptors of rescue mice that express the gene exclusively in dorsal telencephalic glutamatergic neurons (Glu-CB1 -RS) or GABAergic neurons (GABA-CB1 -RS) was studied by immunoelectron microscopy. Results were compared with conditional CB1 receptor knock-out lines.

As expected, CB1immunoparticles appeared at presynaptic plasmalemma making asymmetric and symmetric synapses. In the hippocampal CA1 stratum radiatum, the values of the CB1 receptor immunopositive excitatory and inhibitory synapses were: Glu-CB1 -RS: 21.89% (glutamatergic terminals); 2.38% (GABAergic terminals); GABA-CB1 -RS: 1.92% (glutamatergic terminals); 77.92% (GABAergic terminals). The proportion of CB1 receptor immunopositive excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the inner third of the dentate molecular layer was: Glu-CB1 -RS: 53.19% (glutamatergic terminals); 2.30% (GABAergic terminals); GABA-CB1 -RS: 3.19% (glutamatergic terminals); 85.07% (GABAergic terminals).

Taken together, Glu-CB1 -RS and GABA-CB1 -RS mice show the usual CB1 receptor distribution and expression in hippocampal cell types with specific rescue of the receptor, being therefore ideal for in-depth anatomical and functional investigations of the endocannabinoid system.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27339436

The multiple waves of cannabinoid 1 receptor signaling.

Posted on by

“The cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1R) is one of the most abundant G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in the CNS with key roles during neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity. Upon ligand activation, CB1Rs may signal in three different spatiotemporal waves.

The first wave is transient (<10 minutes) and is initiated by heterotrimeric G proteins followed by a second wave (>10 minutes) mediated by beta-arrestins. A final third wave occurs at intracellular compartments and could be elicited by G proteins or beta-arrestins.

This functional complexity presents multiple challenges, from the correct classification of receptor ligands to the identification of the signaling pathways regulated by each wave and their underlying molecular mechanisms and physiological impact.

Simultaneously, it provides new opportunities to harness the therapeutic potential of the cannabinoid system.

Over the last several years, we have significantly expanded our understanding of the mechanisms and pathways downstream from CB1R. The identification of mutations in the receptor that can bias signaling to specific pathways and the use of siRNA technology in combination with toxins have been key tools to identify which signaling cascades are controlled by G proteins or beta-arrestins.

Here, we review our current knowledge of the multiple waves of CB1R signaling with particular emphasis on the mechanisms and cascades mediated by beta-arrestins downstream from the CB1R.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338082

Activation of the orphan receptor GPR55 by lysophosphatidylinositol promotes metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer.

Posted on by

Image result for Oncotarget.“The orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR55 has been directly or indirectly related to basic alterations that drive malignant growth: uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation, sustained angiogenesis, and cancer cell adhesion and migration. However, little is known about the involvement of this receptor in metastasis.

Here, we show that elevated GPR55 expression in human tumors is associated with the aggressive basal/triple-negative breast cancer population, higher probability to develop metastases, and therefore poor patient prognosis. Activation of GPR55 by its proposed endogenous ligand lysophosphatidylinositol confers pro-invasive features on breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Specifically, this effect is elicited by coupling to Gq/11 heterotrimeric proteins and the subsequent activation, through ERK, of the transcription factor ETV4/PEA3.

Together, these data show that GPR55 promotes breast cancer metastasis, and supports the notion that this orphan receptor may constitute a new therapeutic target and potential biomarker in the highly aggressive triple-negative subtype.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340777

Association between plasma endocannabinoids and appetite in hemodialysis patients: A pilot study.

Posted on by

“Uremia-associated anorexia may be related to altered levels of long chain n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) derived circulating endocannabinoids (EC) and EC-like compounds that are known to mediate appetite. Our study’s hypothesis was that such molecules are associated with appetite in patients with end-stage renal disease. A cross-sectional observational study was performed in 20 chronic hemodialysis patients (9 females, 11 males) and 10 healthy female controls in whom appetite was assessed using the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) and blood drawn in the fasting (and when applicable) pre-dialysis state. Blood levels of PUFA and EC were also measured. Higher blood levels of the long chain n-6 fatty acid 20:4n6 (arachidonic acid) and lower levels of the long chain n-3 fatty acid 20:5n3 (eicosapentaenoic acid) were observed in female hemodialysis patients compared to controls. No differences were observed between male and female patients. In female study participants strong correlations between specific EC-like compounds and total SNAQ scores were noted, including with the n-6 PUFA derived linoleoyl ethanolamide (L-EA; ρ=-0.60, P<.01) and the n-3 PUFA derived docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (DH-EA; ρ=0.63, P<.01). The L-EA:DH-EA ratio was most strongly associated with the SNAQ score (ρ=-0.74, P≤.001), and its questions associated with appetite (ρ=-0.69, P≤.01) and satiety (ρ=-0.81, P≤.001). These findings support a link between circulating EC and appetite in hemodialysis patients.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27333956

Effects of activation of endocannabinoid system on myocardial metabolism.

Posted on by

“Endocannabinoids exert their effect on the regulation of energy homeostasis via activation of specific receptors. They control food intake, secretion of insulin, lipids and glucose metabolism, lipid storage. Long chain fatty acids are the main myocardial energy substrate. However, the heart exerts enormous metabolic flexibility emphasized by its ability to utilzation not only fatty acids, but also glucose, lactate and ketone bodies. Endocannabinoids can directly act on the cardiomyocytes through the CB1 and CB2 receptors present in cardiomyocytes. It appears that direct activation of CB1 receptors promotes increased lipogenesis, pericardial steatosis and bioelectrical dysfunction of the heart. In contrast, stimulation of CB2 receptors exhibits cardioprotective properties, helping to maintain appropriate amount of ATP in cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, the effects of endocannabinoids at both the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, such as liver, pancreas, or adipose tissue, resulting indirectly in plasma availability of energy substrates and affects myocardial metabolism. To date, there is little evidence that describes effects of activation of the endocannabinoid system in the cardiovascular system under physiological conditions. In the present paper the impact of metabolic diseases, i. e. obesity and diabetes, as well as the cardiovascular diseases – hypertension, myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction on the deregulation of the endocannabinoid system and its effect on the metabolism are described.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27333924

Cannabinoids and Neuro-Inflammation: Regulation of Brain Immune Response.

Posted on by

“Cannabinoid receptors are involved in neurophatogenic mechanisms of inflammatory disorders of the central nervous system and their expression can be modulated during the disease.

Brain inflammatory processes are characterized by infiltration of numerous types of cells, peripheral immune cells, brain resident immune cells, the microglial cells and numerous other neuronal cells. The disruption of the blood brain barrier favours cell infiltration in the central nervous system with consequent neuronal damage, common event in many neuro-inflammatory diseases.

In this review we evidence the role of cannabinoid receptor, their expression at peripheral and central levels in order to better understand their implication in neuro-inflammation.

Cannabinoids affect brain adaptive and immune response, have regulatory action on inflammatory mediators and can exert a role in blood brain barrier damage prevention.

Furthermore, in numerous neurodegenerative diseases with inflammatory component the beneficial effects of cannabinoids have been widely reported, so current knowledge of cannabinoid involvement in these central nervous system disorders are also reviewed.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334610