Virucidal activity of Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) root and stem extracts against Japanese encephalitis virus: role of stigmasterol

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) poses a significant public health risk due to the lack of effective antiviral therapies.

To identify novel antiviral agents, we evaluated the antiviral activity of ethanol extracts and organic solvent fractions derived from the roots and stems of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.).

Noncytotoxic concentrations of the extracts and fractions were determined using in vitro cytotoxicity assays. At these concentrations, several fractions demonstrated potent virucidal activity, with the hexane and chloroform fractions showing the strongest effects.

Post-treatment of virus-infected cells with these fractions significantly suppressed viral replication, as evidenced by reduced JEV mRNA and E protein expression. In contrast, pre-treatment or co-treatment did not yield notable antiviral effects. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of multiple known hemp-derived compounds in the active fractions.

Among them, stigmasterol exhibited strong virucidal and antiviral activity. It inhibited viral entry and growth when applied during or after infection and significantly decreased viral mRNA and E protein levels in infected cells.

These findings suggest that stigmasterol contributes to the antiviral effects of hemp extracts and may be one of the active compounds responsible for inhibiting JEV replication.

This study highlights the potential of hemp-derived natural products, particularly stigmasterol, as promising candidates for the development of antiviral agents against JEV infection.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41196377/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-025-06433-z

The Development and Therapeutic Potential of Classical and Next-Generation Cannabinoid Ligands

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The endogenous cannabinoid system (ECS) is a complex network that plays a crucial role in various physiological processes, and its modulation through cannabinoid ligands has garnered significant interest in pharmacological research.

Cannabinoid receptors, primarily CB1 and CB2, are G-protein-coupled receptors that can interact with many different types of ligands, including orthosteric agonists and antagonists and allosteric and biased modulators.

This review provides an updated perspective on cannabinoid receptor ligand development, beginning with natural ligands such as phytocannabinoids and endocannabinoids. These compounds provided the initial inspiration for the design of the first synthetic classical cannabinoids which were later refined into structurally distinct non-classical cannabinoids.

Beyond these traditional orthosteric ligands, we explore the expanding field of allosteric and biased modulators, which offer refined control over receptor signaling and present opportunities to reduce side effects associated with direct receptor activation. We also highlight the significance of covalent ligands and labeled chemical probes in elucidating cannabinoid receptor structure, localization, and function.

Advances in imaging and chemoproteomic techniques have further enhanced our ability to visualize receptor dynamics and identify novel interaction partners. Finally, we examine the clinical landscape of cannabinoid-based therapeutics, from approved drugs to ongoing clinical trials, and discuss the remaining challenges and future directions in ECS-targeted drug development.

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current trends and emerging strategies in cannabinoid ligand research.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41192631/

“The endogenous cannabinoid system has broad therapeutic relevance. “

“Natural and synthetic cannabinoids finely regulate the endogenous cannabinoid system.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661825004475?via%3Dihub

Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol in Dentistry: A Systematic Review From Cellular Mechanisms to Clinical Trials

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: CBD holds substantial promise in medical applications. This review aims to comprehensively analyse the current status of cannabidiol (CBD) in dentistry.

Methods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), European Patent Office (EPO), and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was conducted. Peer-reviewed journal manuscripts focusing on cell studies, clinical trials, and registered patents related to CBD and its derivatives in dentistry were summarised. Inclusion criteria were studies on CBD in dentistry, including original research and patents, published in English between 2013 and mid-2023 (articles) or early 2024 (patents), with full-text availability. Excluded were non-dentistry studies, unpublished or non-peer-reviewed reports, and duplicates using Microsoft Excel. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Two observers independently screened the articles for inclusion in the present study to mitigate bias. Cohen’s kappa was used to measure inter-rater agreement.

Results: The total number of included studies was 57. Cell-based studies demonstrated CBD’s effectiveness in modulating cellular responses and anti-inflammatory properties, especially in oral-origin cells, and its impact on osteogenic differentiation. Research, including clinical trials and patents, has shown CBD’s benefits in treating pain and inflammation in the maxillofacial area, notably in conditions such as radiation-induced mucositis. CBD research in dental pain and inflammation is advanced, but studies on CBD’s role in regenerative dentistry remain limited.

Conclusion: More studies on the mineralisation of oro-facial structures are necessary to fully understand CBD’s role in regenerative dentistry. This study was supported by the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University. This study was registered in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD4201055832) and Open Science Framework (OSF) database (osf.io/z3bd8). The PRISMA guideline was followed to include the relevant full-text papers.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41194764/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.70081

History of cannabis use and cognitive function in older adults: findings from the UK biobank

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Cannabis is a commonly used psychoactive drug, but its cognitive effects remain unclear, particularly in older adults. This study examined associations between past and present cannabis use and cognitive function among dementia-free older adults.

Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were drawn from the UK Biobank, including adults aged ≥60 years. Cannabis use patterns were self-reported, and cognitive function was assessed via computerized tests of attention, executive function, processing speed, visual memory and working memory. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for demographic, health and lifestyle-related covariates.

Results: Cross-sectional analyses included 67 713 participants; longitudinal analyses included 52 002 participants with two cognitive assessments (mean age 67.2 ± 4.4 years; 46.1% male). Lifetime cannabis users (17%) performed better across all cognitive domains: attention (B = 0.071), executive function (B = 0.047), processing speed (B = 0.363), visual (B = 0.062) and working memory (B = 0.181). Current use was associated with better working memory (B = 0.169). Mixed and contradictory results were found for early onset, duration and frequency of use with cognitive outcomes. Longitudinally, past use was associated with less decline in executive function, while longer duration of use predicted steeper decline in processing speed.

Conclusions: Cannabis use is not uniformly harmful to cognition in older adults. Past use was linked to better performance and slower decline in some cognitive domains. However, specific usage patterns, such as longer duration, were associated with poorer outcomes in other domains. These findings highlight the need for further research to clarify underlying mechanisms and guide evidence-based recommendations regarding cannabis use in aging populations.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41189327/

“Cannabis use in older adults is not uniformly associated with cognitive decline; former users showed better cognitive perform.”

“These results offer preliminary evidence that cannabis use may not be uniformly detrimental to cognitive health in aging.”

https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/54/11/afaf319/8313927?login=false

Cannabis sativa extracts reduce inclusion formation in a cell model of alpha-synuclein aggregation

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Parkinson’s disease (PD) is classified as a synucleinopathy due to the accumulation of protein inclusions rich in the alpha-synuclein (aSyn) protein. Identifying effective pharmacological therapies is important to slow the progression and minimize the symptoms of these diseases.

Cannabis sativa has a diverse chemical profile depending on its genotype, including several classes of substances, such as cannabinoids, flavonoids, terpenes, and alkaloids.

In this study, we evaluated the effects of four C. sativa extracts with different phytocannabinoid chemical profiles in two cellular models that reproduce alterations in cellular homeostasis common during the cellular phase of PD and other synucleinopathies. We used Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains transformed with plasmid DNA and genetically modified human cells (H4), both expressing aSyn.

The results showed that all the extracts were antioxidants, decreasing intracellular oxidation levels and increasing the number of daughter cells in yeast cells, but did not prevent mitochondrial damage. Besides, the extracts reduced the number of intracellular inclusions in H4 cells and increased the number of cells without inclusions.

Phytochemical characterization revealed extracts rich in Tetrahydrocannabinol – THC (69.88 %), Cannabidiol – CBD (52.64 %), and Cannabinol – CBN (47.38 % and 58.64 %), and we concluded that, regardless of these percentages, all C. sativa extracts showed protective biological activity against toxicity caused by alpha-synuclein production, both in yeast cells and H4 cells.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41187864/

“Four Cannabis sativa extracts rich in different phytocannabinoids (THC, CBD, and CBN) demonstrated antioxidant potential independent of their chemical profiles. A decrease in the intracellular oxidative environment in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model with aSyn indicates that the extracts (E-THC, E-CBD, E-CBN and E-CBN+) may contribute to maintaining cellular redox homeostasis, minimizing potential effects related to the development of Parkinsonism.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0367326X25005945?via%3Dihub

Cannabidiol sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer cells to NK cell-mediated killing via EGFR inhibition and FAS upregulation

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype lacking targeted therapies, presenting a significant clinical challenge. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a crucial role in TNBC progression, making it a promising target for therapeutic intervention. This study investigated the potential of cannabidiol (CBD) as a therapeutic agent that targets EGFR and associated signaling pathways in TNBC.

Methods: The TNBC cell lines MDA-MB-468 and MDA-MB-231 were treated with CBD in the presence or absence of epidermal growth factor (EGF). Cell proliferation, FAS protein expression, and activation of the EGFR signaling pathway were assessed. The cytotoxic effects of CBD on TNBC cells and natural killer (NK) cells were also evaluated.

Results: CBD significantly elevated FAS protein expression in MDA-MB-468 cells compared to EGF treatment alone (125.29 ± 5.87% vs. 83.07 ± 1.30%, p < 0.0001). Further molecular analysis revealed that CBD inhibited EGFR signaling by downregulating key oncogenic proteins, including KRAS, PI3K, and AKT. Moreover, CBD enhanced the cytotoxic effects of NK-92 cells, reducing the viability of MDA-MB-468 cells more effectively than EGF alone did (52.12 ± 1.28% vs. 113.69 ± 1.68%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that CBD holds promise as a potential anticancer agent in TNBC by disrupting EGFR signaling and promoting apoptosis. However, further studies are necessary to optimize its therapeutic window and minimize adverse effects, particularly regarding its potential cytotoxicity to immune cells.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41188939/

“Our findings underscore the therapeutic potential of CBD in TNBC by targeting EGFR-driven pathways, modulating FAS expression, and enhancing immune-mediated killing. This study offers renewed hope for patients facing this challenging disease, positioning CBD as a potentially potent and multifaceted therapeutic agent.”

https://jcannabisresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42238-025-00340-5

The Endocannabinoid System: Pharmacological Targets and Therapeutic Potential in CNS Disorders

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The endocannabinoid system (ECS) influences a wide range of brain functions, including synaptic transmission, neuroplasticity, emotion, and immune regulation within the central nervous system, with CB1 and CB2 receptors mediating various neurophysiological and pathophysiological outcomes. Thus, growing interest in its therapeutic potential has prompted extensive research into how cannabinoid receptors contribute to the pathophysiology of neurological and psychiatric disorders, particularly CB1 and CB2.

This review has integrated findings from studies published between 2015 and 2025, covering conditions, like depression, anxiety, pain, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease. We have also examined recent advances in receptor pharmacology and experimental technologies, including cryo-EM, optogenetics, and chemogenetics.

Although ECS-targeted therapeutics hold considerable promise, some key challenges remain in establishing safe and effective dosing protocols and integrating these approaches into clinical frameworks.

This review has provided an updated perspective on the system’s role in brain health and its potential to inform future therapeutic directions. Thus, ECS-targeted strategies may become increasingly important in managing and treating central nervous system disorders.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41178765/

https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/151549

Dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system – a key factor in the progression of multiple sclerosis?

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The endocannabinoid system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet its role across different disease stages and under disease-modifying treatment remains incompletely understood.

This study aimed to evaluate plasma levels of anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) in patients with MS at different clinical stages, and to explore their associations with disability, cognition, and quality of life, as well as the potential influence of teriflunomide therapy.

Thirty participants were enrolled: ten healthy controls, ten newly diagnosed relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in acute relapse, and ten teriflunomide-treated RRMS patients in remission. Plasma AEA and 2-AG were measured by ELISA; clinical assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire.

No significant group differences were observed overall in 2-AG (P > 0.05). AEA showed a non-significant overall group effect (ANOVA, P = 0.0919) with a trend toward lower AEA in newly diagnosed patients compared to healthy controls (mean difference = -5.95 ng/ml, SE = 2.66; P = 0.098). In the teriflunomide group, AEA and 2-AG were strongly positively correlated (r = 0.882, P < 0.001). Additionally, SF-36 scores were positively associated with MMSE (r = 0.706, P = 0.023). Furthermore, SF-36 total scores were significantly lower in newly diagnosed patients compared to controls (post-hoc P = 0.044).

These findings suggest possible early dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system in MS and indicate that teriflunomide treatment is associated with a strengthened AEA-2-AG relationship. Larger, longitudinal studies are warranted to confirm these observations and to assess clinical implications for disease progression and patient quality of life.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41178906/

Cannabinoids rescue migraine symptoms caused by central CGRP administration in mice

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“This study investigates the therapeutic potential of a combined dose of cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) at a 100:1 ratio (100 mg/kg CBD and 1 mg/kg THC) in mitigating central calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-induced migraine symptoms in a mouse model.

The 100:1 ratio of CBD to THC was administered intraperitoneally, 60 minutes prior to starting all the assays, followed by intracerebroventricular CGRP administration, 30 minutes later, with behavior assays conducted 30 minutes after CGRP injection. To determine whether pretreatment of CBD:THC could counteract CGRP-induced light aversion, we utilized the light/dark assay, which also recorded motility behavior. To investigate whether CBD:THC pretreatment could alleviate CGRP-induced spontaneous pain, we used the automated squint assay.

Our findings show that pretreatment with 100:1 CBD:THC rescued light aversion caused by centrally administered CGRP in CD1 mice. Additionally, CBD:THC pretreatment rescued the increased resting time in darkness, decreased transitions between light and dark zones, and partially rescued the decreased rearing behavior induced by centrally administered CGRP. Moreover, an open field assay confirmed that centrally administered CGRP did not induce anxiety in a light independent assay. Finally, our findings from the automated squint assay indicate that pretreatment with 100:1 CBD:THC partially rescued centrally administered CGRP-induced spontaneous pain.

Collectively, these results demonstrate that a combination of CBD and THC can alleviate light aversion and pain symptoms induced by a centrally-acting migraine trigger.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41182862/

“The medicinal properties of the plant Cannabis can be traced back thousands of years, with some of its earliest records dating to Chinese medicine around 2700 BC, and Indian medicine around 900 BC. During the late 19th to early 20th centuries, many Western physicians considered Cannabis to be the “most satisfactory” remedy for migraine, and, for eight decades, it was the primary treatment for migraine in mainstream Western medical literature.”

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03331024251392103

Cannabis Use Patterns Among Adults Living With Chronic Pain Before and During the COVID Pandemic: Insights From the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: This study aims to identify sociodemographic factors associated with cannabis use for chronic pain management before and after COVID-19 was declared a pandemic. Furthermore, it seeks to compare cannabis use patterns in adults with and without chronic pain.

Methods: We analyzed US-based responses from the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Study, a cross-sectional online survey administered via REDCap between March 2020 and March 2022. All respondents were cannabis consumers in the past year. Cannabis use patterns and chronic pain were self-reported via the COVID-19 Cannabis Health Questionnaire. Statistical analysis included Chi-square tests, Fisher’s exact tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression with a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 for significance.

Results: Among 2243 participants, 50.3% consumed cannabis to manage chronic pain. Younger age (< 40 years; aOR: 3.20, 95% CI: 2.59-3.96), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (aOR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.56-3.05), and higher income levels (> $100,000 annually; aOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.25-2.29) were associated with higher odds of consuming cannabis to manage chronic pain. Participants using cannabis for chronic pain were more likely to use a CBD/THC ratio. The pandemic led to increased dosages and changes in consumption methods: 40.5% increased their cannabis dose, smoking as the primary method declined from 62.2% before the pandemic to 34.5% afterward, while edibles rose from 7.9% to 30.9%, and tinctures from 3.2% to 8.6%. Route changes varied with chronic pain status.

Conclusion: There was a shift from smoking to nonsmoking methods to manage chronic pain. Those who were younger and those of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity had higher odds of using cannabis for chronic pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41179652/

“In recent years, cannabis has emerged as a promising alternative for pain management, driven by increasing evidence of its analgesic properties.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/prm/9631487