Combination CBD/THC in the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized double blind controlled trial

pubmed logo

“Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) can greatly impair function, leading to disability or truncated treatment in cancer patients. Previous animal studies show that cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can ameliorate CIPN. This study assessed the effect of combined CBD and THC on CIPN symptoms amongst cancer patients treated with taxane- or platinum-based agents.

Materials and methods: This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included participants with nonmetastatic breast, colorectal, endometrial, or ovarian cancer experiencing grade 2-3 CIPN. The active group received CBD (125.3-135.9 mg) combined with THC (6.0-10.8 mg) in gelcaps. The Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-CIPN twenty-item scale (QLQ-CIPN20) sensory subscale was used as the primary outcome. Additional outcomes assessed pain, sleep, and function. Neurologic exams evaluated touch, pressure, and vibration sense. Following the randomized controlled trial, participants were invited to enroll in a 12-week open-label observational study.

Results: Of 230 participants identified, 124 met eligibility, 54 were enrolled, 46 were randomized, and 43 completed 12 weeks of treatment. This was lower than our goal of 100 randomized participants. The mean age was 60 +/- 9 years, 88% were female, 63% had breast cancer. All participants had completed chemotherapy. The primary analysis showed no differences in outcome measures between active and placebo groups, likely due to sample size. Although an increase in bilirubin (one participant in active group, and one in placebo) and alkaline phosphatase (one participant in active group) was seen, this did not exceed the exit criteria. A secondary analysis showed that the active group experienced greater improvement in the QLQ-CIPN20 measures of sensory impairment relative to placebo (-10.4 (95% -20.5, -0.3), p = 0.044). There was also improvement in light touch and vibration sensation of the feet on neurological exam that approached significance. There was no effect on other measures, including pain, and no between-group differences in side effects. The uncontrolled observational study showed similar results.

Discussion: The primary analysis showed no between-group difference in CIPN symptoms. The secondary analysis indicated that CBD with THC could improve sensory impairment and might increase touch and vibration sense, although these findings require confirmation in a future, more fully powered study. Nonetheless, our results show that combination CBD/THC can be safely delivered to participants with CIPN and suggest that these cannabinoids should be further investigated for this indication.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41211445/

“Overall, this study suggests that combination CBD/THC could help with the sensory impairment seen in CIPN. Since the disorder is prevalent and incurs significant hardship, even a modest sensory improvement could enhance patients’ quality of life, given the lack of alternatives.”

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1590168/full

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Cannabis Therapy for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A 5-Year Longitudinal Observational Study

pubmed logo

“Background/Objectives: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting up to 50% of long-term patients and causing significant pain, reduced quality of life, and healthcare burden. Conventional treatments, including anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and opioids, offer limited efficacy and are associated with adverse effects. Emerging evidence suggests that cannabis, acting via the endocannabinoid system, may provide analgesic and neuroprotective benefits. This study evaluates the long-term effects of inhaled cannabis as adjunctive therapy for refractory painful DN. Inhaled cannabis exhibits rapid onset pharmacokinetics (within minutes, lasting 2-4 h) due to pulmonary absorption, targeting CB1 and CB2 receptors to modulate pain and inflammation. 

Methods: In this prospective, observational study, 52 patients with confirmed painful DN, unresponsive to at least three prior analgesics plus non-pharmacological interventions, were recruited from a single clinic. Following a 1-month washout, patients initiated inhaled medical-grade cannabis (20% THC, <1% CBD), titrated individually. Assessments occurred at baseline and annually for 5 years, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) for pain severity and interference; the degree of pain relief; Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) score; HbA1c; and medication usage. Statistical analyses used repeated-measures ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Welch’s t-tests, and Pearson’s correlations via Analyze-it for Excel. 

Results: Of 52 patients (mean age 45.3 ± 17.8 years; 71.2% male; diabetes duration 23.3 ± 17.8 years), 50 completed follow-up visits. Significant reductions occurred in BPI pain severity (9.0 ± 0.8 to 2.0 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), interference (7.5 ± 1.7 to 2.2 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), LANSS score (19.4 ± 3.8 to 10.2 ± 6.4, p < 0.001), and HbA1c (9.77% ± 1.50 to 7.79% ± 1.51, p < 0.001). Analgesic use decreased markedly (e.g., morphine equivalents: 66.8 ± 49.2 mg to 4.5 ± 9.6 mg). Cannabis dose correlated positively with pain relief (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and negatively with narcotic use (r = -0.43, p < 0.001) and pain interference (r = -0.43, p < 0.001). No serious adverse events were reported; mild side effects (e.g., dry mouth or euphoria) occurred in 15.4% of patients. 

Conclusions: Inhaled cannabis showed sustained pain relief, improved glycemic control, and opioid-sparing effects in refractory DN over 5 years, with a favorable safety profile. These findings are associative due to the observational design, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm efficacy and determine optimal usage, addressing limitations such as single-center bias and small sample size (n = 52). Future studies incorporating biomarker analysis (e.g., endocannabinoid levels) could elucidate mechanisms and enhance precision in cannabis therapy.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41153689/

“Inhaled cannabis add-on therapy mitigated symptoms of diabetic neuropathy over the course of a five-year observation period. Some reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin is observed as well as major reduction in the need for other prescription medications, including opiates and opioids. It is possible to state the following: (1). Inhaled cannabis significantly reduced pain and neuropathic symptoms over 5 years. (2). It decreased opioid use, supporting an opioid-sparing effect. (3). HbA1c improvements suggest a metabolic benefit, though causality is unproven. (4). No serious adverse events occurred, with mild effects in 15.4% of patients. (5). RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address accessibility barriers. Integration of objective pain assessment tools, such as salivary biomarker devices, could enhance the precision and reproducibility of cannabis therapy outcomes in DN.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/10/2406

Cannabigerol Modulates Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Expression in the Spinal Dorsal Horn and Attenuates Neuropathic Pain Models

pubmed logo

“Background/Objectives: The expanding focus on novel therapeutic pathways for long-term pain relief has directed interest toward compounds obtained from Cannabis sativa. This study evaluated the antinociceptive potential of cannabigerol-enriched extract (CBG) in models of acute and chronic hypernociception, along with morphological outcomes. 

Methods: Formalin and hot plate tests were used on male Swiss mice to assess acute oral antinociception. To the chronic pain model, 8-week-old male Wistar rats underwent spinal nerve ligation (SNL), and CBG was administered orally by gavage once daily for 14 days. 

Results: CBG reduced nociceptive responses in the formalin test and hot plate tests, mainly at a dose of 30 mg/kg, showing antinociceptive activity. CBG attenuated SNL-induced thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity, accompanied by reduced microglial density and spinal morphological changes. Importantly, cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) signaling contributed to the antinociceptive effects of orally administered CBG, whereas cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R), Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) did not appear to play major roles under our experimental conditions. 

Conclusions: Collectively, these findings support CBG as a promising alternative for chronic pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41155621/

“In summary, our study provides robust evidence that CBG exerts potent antinociceptive effects across acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain models.

Collectively, these results highlight CBG as a promising candidate for pain management and support further translational studies.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/10/1508

Plant-Derived Compounds: A Potential Treasure for Development of Analgesic and Antinociceptive Therapeutics

pubmed logo

“Pain is one of the most pervasive health problems associated with a negative impact on thinking, mood, psychological, and social communication.

The medicinal plants and their derived compounds have recently attracted great interest as potential candidates for defeating pain because of their worldwide safety, availability, and affordability.

This review was constructed to summarize all in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials regarding plant-derived compounds’ analgesic and antinociceptive effects. Further, we focus on structural aspects, molecular mechanisms, and pharmacological effects. A literature survey was performed in “PubMed,” “Science Direct,” and “Google Scholar,” using the keywords “Pain, Analgesic activity, Flavonoids, Phenolics, Medicinal plants, Volatile oils, Tannins, Saponins, Alkaloids” to assess the activities of each compound.

The main natural compounds studied were flavonoids, alkaloids, phenolic acids, lignans, anthraquinones, and volatile oils. Different in vitro studies utilized nucleus pulposus cells, VK2/E6E7, End1/E6E7, and LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells to assess analgesic effects. The frequently defined animal models of analgesic activity included acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions, hot-plate test, tail-flick test, formalin test, complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced pain, and hind paw incisional surgery.

For the natural compounds described, the opioids, serotonergic, and cannabinoid receptors appeared to be the most promising targets for pain management. This review suggested a wealthy resource of natural compounds as analgesic and antinociceptive candidates for pharmacists and drug researchers to launch a new drug with promising efficacy and safety.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41126401/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ptr.70113

Cannabidiol engages the peripheral endogenous opioid system to produce analgesia in neuropathic mice

pubmed logo

“Cannabidiol (CBD) has been getting attention from the scientific community regarding its potential for the treatment of different conditions, such as epilepsy, anxiety, and pain.

This potential can be useful in clinical practice as an alternative or as an adjuvant alongside conventional therapeutic approaches; however, its mechanisms of action should be best described for its more effective application. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate whether the peripheral opioid system is involved in the analgesic mechanism of cannabidiol administered systemically for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Male Swiss mice were subjected to the sciatic constriction injury, and their nociceptive threshold was evaluated using the mechanical paw pressure test.

Cannabidiol 20 mg/Kg produced an antinociceptive effect. Bestatin (400 µg/paw), a selective aminopeptidase-N inhibitor, potentiates the intermediate analgesic response of CBD at the dose of 2 mg/Kg. Naloxone (50 µg/paw), a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, reversed the CBD-mediated analgesia. CTOP (5, 10, and 20 µg/paw) and naltrindole (30, 60, and 120 µg/paw), μ and Δ opioid receptor antagonists, but not norBNI (200 µg/paw), a κ opioid receptor antagonist, partially reversed the CBD analgesia.

Thus, our study shows that cannabidiol may induce activation of opioid receptors in the periphery as a part of its analgesic mechanism in neuropathic pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41022278/

“CDB induces the activation of µ and δ opioid receptors as a part of its analgesia mechanism, leading us to suggest a possible interaction between opioid and cannabinoid systems as a complementary mechanism for generating peripheral analgesia in neuropathic mice treated with cannabidiol.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304394025002824?via%3Dihub

Cannabis sativa Root Extract Exerts Anti-Nociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Effects via Endocannabinoid Pathway Modulation In Vivo and In Vitro

pubmed logo

“Cannabis sativa root has traditionally been used to relieve pain and inflammation, but its pharmacological properties remain underexplored due to low levels of psychoactive cannabinoids.

This study aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects of the ethyl acetate fraction of Cannabis sativa root (CSREA) using in vivo rodent pain models. Mice were subjected to formalin and acetic acid-induced nociceptive tests, while rats were evaluated using a carrageenan-induced paw edema model.

CSREA significantly reduced pain-related behaviors in both early (0-10 min) and late phases (15-30 min) of the formalin test and decreased writhing responses in the acetic acid model. Notably, CSREA also improved survival rates following acetic acid injection. Inflammatory markers, including IL-6 and IL-1β, were significantly lowered in serum.

Furthermore, CSREA suppressed paw edema and redness in the carrageenan-induced rat model, demonstrating dose-dependent anti-inflammatory efficacy comparable to diclofenac. CSREA also downregulated pain-related gene expression (SCN9AASIC1ATACR1) and regulated key enzymes involved in endocannabinoid metabolism (FAAHMAGLDAGL), suggesting its role in the molecular modulation of pain pathways.

These effects are likely mediated via modulation of the endocannabinoid system, particularly by rebalancing the CB1R/CB2R ratio. The findings suggest that CSREA holds promise as a natural therapeutic agent for managing pain and inflammation and warrants further investigation into its molecular mechanisms and long-term effects.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41009431/

“This study provides evidence for the in vivo analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and underlying mechanism of CSREA in vitro. Our results from the formalin and writhing tests demonstrate that CSREA significantly reduced nociceptive pain-related behaviors and inflammatory cytokine levels indicating strong anti-nociceptive properties in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, CSREA markedly reduced paw edema in the carrageenan-induced rat model, suggesting its potential as a natural product with anti-inflammatory activity. These effects are likely mediated through modulation of the endocannabinoid system, particularly by altering cannabinoid levels as demonstrated in the in vitro model.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/18/8863

Comparative Effects of THC and CBD on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Insights from a Large Real-World Self-Reported Dataset

pubmed logo

“Background/Objective: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting adverse effect of various chemotherapeutic agents. Previous work demonstrated that cannabis alleviates symptoms of oxaliplatin-induced CIPN. To evaluate the effects of cannabis components, cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), on CIPN-related symptoms. 

Methods: We reviewed a patient-reported outcomes dataset from “Tikun Olam,” a major medical cannabis provider. Of 1493 patients, 802 reported at least one CIPN symptom at baseline, including a burning sensation, cold sensation, paresthesia (prickling) and numbness, and 751 of them met the study inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into THC-high/CBD-low and CBD-high/THC-low groups. Symptom changes after six months of cannabis use were analyzed using K-means clustering and logistic regression, incorporating interactions between baseline symptoms and THC and CBD doses. Linear regression assessed changes in activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL). 

Results: Both groups reported symptom improvement. The THC-high group showed significantly greater improvement in burning sensation and cold sensation (p = 0.024 and p = 0.008). Improvements in ADL and QOL were also significantly higher in the THC group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.006). A significant interaction between THC and CBD was observed for symptom improvement (p < 0.0001). 

Conclusions: Cannabis effectively reduces CIPN symptoms and improves QOL and ADL. Higher THC doses were more effective than lower doses, with combined CBD and THC doses yielding greater symptom relief.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40868175/

“Cannabis products demonstrated efficacy in alleviating symptoms associated with CIPN and resulted in a reduction in the number of reported symptoms. Improvements in symptoms and in QOL and ADL questionnaire responses were observed when queried after six months of cannabis use. Higher doses of THC showed greater efficacy than lower doses, while gradually increasing doses of both CBD and THC alone and in combination correlated better with symptom improvement.

The observed dose–response relationship of both THC and CBD highlights the need for prospective controlled trials to establish optimal cannabinoid ratios for specific symptom clusters, such as burning or cold sensations. Future studies should also aim to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of cannabis in oncology patients, as well as explore mechanistic pathways linking cannabinoid receptor activation to neuroprotection and anti-inflammatory effects in CIPN.

Personalized treatment strategies, incorporating cannabinoid pharmacogenetics and symptom-driven dose titration, should be further investigated to better integrate medical cannabis into standard supportive oncology care.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/8/1921

Medical Cannabis Use and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Chronic Pain: A Causal Inference Analysis Using TMLE

pubmed logo

“Introduction: Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of U.S. adults, imposing significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. Medical cannabis has emerged as a potential therapy, yet its impact on healthcare utilization remains unclear.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed administrative data from a telehealth platform providing medical cannabis certifications across 36 U.S. states. Patients were classified as cannabis-exposed if they had used cannabis in the past year, while unexposed patients had no prior cannabis use. Outcomes included self-reported urgent care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and quality of life (QoL), measured using the CDC’s Healthy Days measure. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation with SuperLearner estimated causal effects, adjusting for numerous covariates.

Results: Medical cannabis users exhibited significantly lower healthcare utilization. Specifically, exposure was associated with a 2.0 percentage point reduction in urgent care visits (95% CI: -0.036, -0.004), a 3.2 percentage point reduction in ED visits (95% CI: -0.051, -0.012) and fewer unhealthy days per month (-3.52 days, 95% CI: -4.28, -2.76). Hospitalization rates trended lower but were not statistically significant. Covariate balance and propensity score overlap indicated well-fitting models.

Conclusions: Medical cannabis use was associated with reduced healthcare utilization and improved self-reported QoL among chronic pain patients.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40700267/

“The findings of this study suggest, in line with existing research, that medical cannabis is likely an effective treatment option for patients with chronic pain. Moreover, we found that, in addition to an increase in QoL, medical cannabis exposure is associated with lower risk of urgent care and ED visits, when comparing patients who used medical cannabis for at least one year to cannabis-naïve patients. This underscores the potential for not only QoL gains associated with medical cannabis use, but also positive downstream effects on the healthcare system resulting from treatment.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/13/4/96

Machine-learning of medical cannabis chemical profiles reveals analgesia beyond placebo expectations

pubmed logo

“Background: The efficacy of medical cannabis in alleviating pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials, yet questions remain regarding the extent to which specific chemical compounds contribute to analgesia versus expectation-based (placebo) responses. Effective blinding is notoriously difficult in cannabis trials, complicating the identification of compound-specific effects.

Methods: In a prospective study of 329 chronic pain patients (40% females; aged 48.9 ± 15.5) prescribed medical cannabis, we examined whether the chemical composition of cannabis cultivars could predict treatment outcomes. We used a Random Forest classifier with nested cross-validation to assess the predictive value of demographics, clinical features, and approximately 200 chemical compounds. Model robustness was evaluated using six additional machine learning algorithms.

Results: Here we show that incorporating chemical composition markedly improves the prediction of pain relief (AUC = 0.63 ± 0.10) compared to models using only demographic and clinical features (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09; p < 0.001). This result is consistent across all models tested. While well-known cannabinoids such as THC and CBD provide limited predictive value, specific terpenoids, particularly α-Bisabolol and eucalyptol, emerge as key predictors of treatment response.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that pain relief can be predicted from cannabis chemical profiles that are unknown to patients, providing evidence for compound-specific therapeutic effects. These results highlight the importance of considering the full range of cannabis compounds when developing more precise and effective cannabis-based therapies for pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40670615/

“Chronic pain affects millions of people, and many turn to medical cannabis for relief. However, scientists debate whether cannabis truly reduces pain or if patients feel better simply because they expect it to work (placebo effect). In this study, we looked at 329 people who used medical cannabis and analyzed the chemical makeup of their treatments. Using machine learning, we tested whether the specific chemicals in cannabis could predict who would get pain relief.

We found that patients’ pain improvement could be predicted from the chemical content of their cannabis, even though patients didn’t know what chemicals they were receiving. This suggests that cannabis provides real pain relief beyond just patient expectations.

These findings show that medical cannabis has genuine therapeutic effects for pain management.”

“In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, our study provides compelling evidence that the efficacy of MC in pain relief is not merely a placebo response but is strongly influenced by its diverse chemical composition. Our findings challenge the traditional focus on THC and CBD as the primary therapeutic agents in cannabis and highlight the importance of considering the full spectrum of chemical compounds present in MC. By embracing a more comprehensive approach to understanding MC’s therapeutic potential, we can work towards developing safer, more effective, and more precisely targeted treatments for the millions of individuals suffering from chronic pain worldwide.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-025-00996-3

Prevention of Allodynia and Hyperalgesia by Cannabidiol in a Rat Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

pubmed logo

“This study demonstrates the utility of a rat model of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) to assess the ability of the non-psychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) to modulate the development of this syndrome in vivo. The method utilizes the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel to generate an allodynic phenotype in the animals.

This study describes how to handle and solubilize CBD, administer the chemotherapeutic agent, assess mechanical and cold sensitivity, and apply high-speed videography to measure nocifensive behavior in animals.

Using the procedures outlined, the data support that CBD prevents the allodynic phenotype from developing in the treated animals. No difference was observed in the CBD-treated animals from day 0 (pre-paclitaxel baseline) to day 7 (post-sensitization) in mechanical or thermal sensitivity, while the vehicle-treated animals became significantly more sensitive.

This response to treatment is durable up to the latest time point where data were collected (7 weeks). The addition of high-speed videography allows for a more granular and unbiased assessment of this behavioral phenotype (e.g., classification of analgesia and anti-allodynia).

This demonstrates both the utility of this model for cannabinoid drug characterization and the potential role of CBD in mitigating neuropathic pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40622941/

“Co-administration of CBD with paclitaxel prevents the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in rats. This protocol describes cannabinoid handling, inducing an allodynic phenotype in rats via chemotherapeutic administration, assessing mechanical and thermal allodynia, and using high-speed videography to distinguish allodynia and hyperalgesia.”

https://app.jove.com/t/68079/prevention-allodynia-hyperalgesia-cannabidiol-rat-model-chemotherapy