Cannabinoids in the landscape of cancer

Introduction: Cannabinoids are a group of terpenophenolic compounds derived from the Cannabis sativa L. plant. There is a growing body of evidence from cell culture and animal studies in support of cannabinoids possessing anticancer properties.

Method: A database search of peer reviewed articles published in English as full texts between January 1970 and April 2021 in Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science was undertaken. References of relevant literature were searched to identify additional studies to construct a narrative literature review of oncological effects of cannabinoids in pre-clinical and clinical studies in various cancer types.

Results: Phyto-, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoids demonstrated antitumour effects both in vitro and in vivo. However, these effects are dependent on cancer type, the concentration and preparation of the cannabinoid and the abundance of receptor targets. The mechanism of action of synthetic cannabinoids, (-)-trans-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) has mainly been described via the traditional cannabinoid receptors; CB1 and CB2, but reports have also indicated evidence of activity through GPR55, TRPM8 and other ion channels including TRPA1, TRPV1 and TRPV2.

Conclusion: Cannabinoids have shown to be efficacious both as a single agent and in combination with antineoplastic drugs. These effects have occurred through various receptors and ligands and modulation of signalling pathways involved in hallmarks of cancer pathology. There is a need for further studies to characterise its mode of action at the molecular level and to delineate efficacious dosage and route of administration in addition to synergistic regimes.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34259916

“Since time immemorial, the Cannabis plant has been used as a source of fibre, herbal remedymedicinal and for religious purposes. Plant-based, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid compounds have shown merits in not only alleviating the unwanted side effects of antineoplastic drug regiments, but have also shown promising evidence in decreasing tumour burden.”

“Plant-based, endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid compounds have shown merits in not only alleviating the unwanted side effects of antineoplastic drug regiments, but have also shown promising evidence in decreasing tumour burden, and one in vivo study so far concludes increasing survival rates in mice.

The antitumour effects of cannabinoids trend in modulating processes which include apoptosis and autophagy through first stimulating de novo synthesis of ceramide which induces activation of ER stress-related signalling proteins further leading to the inhibition of the AKT/mTORC1 axis promoting cell cycle arrest and additional mechanisms, such as cell death and aging.

Other pathways involved mechanistically are activation of MAPK/ERK signalling through calcium induction. Strategies that would optimize the anticancer effects of cannabinoids through interference of these signalling cross-talks may prove useful for therapeutic intervention. Nevertheless, we found that these effects were reached differently downstream depending on the type of cancer, the dosage of the compound and which receptor/ligands were activated.

We also found the co-administration of cannabinoids with chemotherapy drugs enhanced the potency of these effects. These synergistic effects should be targeted for translation to clinical application, especially in cancers which are refractory to chemotherapy.

Various extracted forms of cannabinoids from C. sativa have shown varying cytotoxic effects which should be explored in more detail in future studies as majority of the evidence originates from studies investigating mainly ∆9-THC and CBD’s actions. Whilst the emerging evidence of phytocannabinoid anticancer effects are promising, there remains a paucity of clinical evaluation which must be overcome.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00432-021-03710-7

Plant-derived cannabinoids as anticancer agents

“Substantial preclinical evidence demonstrates the antiproliferative, cytotoxic, and antimetastatic properties of plant-derived cannabinoids (phytocannabinoids) such as cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabinol. The cumulative body of research into the intracellular mechanisms and phenotypic effects of these compounds supports a logical, judicious progression to large-scale phase II/III clinical trials in certain cancer types to truly assess the efficacy of phytocannabinoids as anticancer agents.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35260379

https://www.cell.com/trends/cancer/abstract/S2405-8033(22)00024-3?

Toxicity and carcinogenicity of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in Fischer rats and B6C3F1 mice

“delta 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) was studied for potential carcinogenicity in rodents because it is the principal psychoactive ingredient in marihuana and it has potential medicinal uses.

There was no evidence that delta 9-THC was carcinogenic in rats or mice.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8812248

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272059096900482?via%3Dihub


Computational GWAS Meta Meta Analysis Revealing Cross Talk Between Cannabis CNR1 and DRD2 Receptors Optimizing Long-Term Outcomes for Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) By Enhancing Dopamine Homeostasis Promoting High-Quality Cannabis Medicinals

“This paper presents a shared perspective from scientists and clinicians seeking to harness the therapeutic potential of cannabis while addressing Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) through reproducible scientific findings.

Rather than blocking CNR1 receptors, which may induce hypodopaminergia, we propose a pro-dopaminergic strategy using a natural nutraceutical formulation designed to enhance dopamine release and upregulate D2 receptor mRNA, thereby increasing D2 receptor density.

Given the failure of CNR1 antagonists such as Rimonabant, we argue for an opposite approach: restoring dopamine balance through CNR1 stimulation rather than inhibition.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41333412

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-8140327/v1


Predictors of Replacing Alcohol With Cannabis Among Adult Women

Background: Alcohol use among women varies by age, with younger women more likely to binge drink and older women more often engaging in consistent, long-term consumption. Both groups face health risks, including chronic disease, mental health conditions, and sleep disturbance. Cannabis has been proposed as a harm reduction substitute for alcohol because of its lower risks of dependency and health harms. The aims of this study are (a) to identify differences between younger and older women regarding their choices to use cannabis products as a substitute for alcohol and (b) to explore multiple drivers (sleep, stress, health state, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and severity of alcohol use) behind the choice to replace alcohol with cannabis.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 413 women aged 18 years and above who reported lifetime cannabis use. Participants were stratified into younger (<56 years) and older (≥56 years) groups. Measures included sociodemographics, cannabis substitution behaviors (cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or both), self-rated health, sleep and stress difficulties, and validated scales: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD-4), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). Group differences were tested using chi-square and t-tests, and logistic regression identified predictors of substitution.

Results: Younger women (mean age 44.2 years) were significantly more likely than older women (mean age 62.9 years) to substitute THC for alcohol (14.0% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.019) and reported higher rates of sleep problems (52.5% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.007) and stress-coping difficulties (37% vs. 27%, p = 0.013). They also scored higher on AUDIT, PTSD, GAD, and PHQ instruments (all p < 0.01). Older women were more likely not to substitute cannabis for alcohol (83.5% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.002). Regression analyses showed that younger women with poorer health (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.04-3.00) and higher AUDIT scores (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14) were more likely to substitute both CBD and THC. Sleep problems strongly predicted THC substitution in younger women (OR = 5.82, 95% CI: 1.58-21.45). Among older women, PTSD symptoms predicted substitution of both CBD and THC (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.55), and sleep problems predicted THC substitution (OR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.00-9.32).

Conclusions: Age-related differences emerged in women’s substitution of cannabis for alcohol. Younger women more frequently substituted THC and were influenced by alcohol severity, poor health, and sleep disturbance, whereas older women substituted less often, with PTSD and sleep difficulties as key predictors. These findings underscore cannabis substitution as a nuanced harm reduction strategy that requires age-specific approaches.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41328136

“This study explored cannabis substitution as a potential harm reduction strategy, and its findings may inform prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing alcohol-related harms and improving women’s health outcomes.”

https://www.cureus.com/articles/418147-predictors-of-replacing-alcohol-with-cannabis-among-adult-women#!

The use of cannabis in supportive care and treatment of brain tumor

“Cannabinoids are multitarget substances. Currently available are dronabinol (synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, THC), synthetic cannabidiol (CBD) the respective substances isolated and purified from cannabis, a refined extract, nabiximols (THC:CBD = 1.08:1.00); and nabilone, which is also synthetic and has properties that are very similar to those of THC.

Cannabinoids have a role in the treatment of cancer as palliative interventions against nausea, vomiting, pain, anxiety, and sleep disturbances. THC and nabilone are also used for anorexia and weight loss, whereas CBD has no orexigenic effect. The psychotropic effects of THC and nabilone, although often undesirable, can improve mood when administered in low doses. CBD has no psychotropic effects; it is anxiolytic and antidepressive.

Of particular interest are glioma studies in animals where relatively high doses of CBD and THC demonstrated significant regression of tumor volumes (approximately 50% to 95% and even complete eradication in rare cases). Concomitant treatment with X-rays or temozolomide enhanced activity further.

Similarly, a combination of THC with CBD showed synergistic effects. Although many questions, such as on optimized treatment schedules, are still unresolved, today’s scientific results suggest that cannabinoids could play an important role in palliative care of brain tumor patients.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31385997

“For medicinal use, evidence goes back 5000 years to the Chinese emperor Chen Nung. Archeological findings suggest that palliative cancer treatment with cannabis was already in use 2500 years ago.”

“Cannabinoids Can be Used in Palliative Care for a Wide Range of Symptoms.”

“Cannabinoids Reduce Nausea and Vomiting.”

“Increase of Appetite and Weight is Only Seen with CB1 Agonists such as THC.”

“Cannabinoids Moderately but Consistently Improve Chronic Pain.”

“Cannabinoids Demonstrate Antitumor Effects on Glioma Cells.”

“Cannabinoids are Highly Effective in Animal Glioma Models.”

“Anticancer Effects of Cannabinoids may be able to Prolong Life.”

“Funded by the National Institutes of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, the study found instead that THC slowed the growth of 3 kinds of cancer in mice—lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia. The US Drug Enforcement Agency quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research even though the researchers demonstrated remarkable antitumor effects.”

https://academic.oup.com/nop/article/4/3/151/2918616?login=false

RSM-Based Optimization of Dose Response and Antibacterial Potential of Cannabis sativa (L.) Leaves Using Computational Analysis

Background: In light of the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, it is imperative to investigate new sources, and plants offer a promising supply of bioactive chemicals. Because of its numerous uses in industry, health, and nutrition as well as its antibacterial qualities, Cannabis sativa (C.sativa) has garnered a lot of study interest. This study sought to determine whether ethanolic extracts from C.sativa leaves have antibacterial properties against six human pathogenic microorganisms.

Methodology: The antibacterial activity of C.sativa ethanolic extract was tested against six bacteria according to design of experiments made by Agar diffusion method accompanied by response surface method (RSM) of Minitab 17 software. The different combinations set were, concentration: 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0, pH: 5.0, 6.5, 8.0 and temperature: 35°C, 37.5°C, 40°C. By using RSM, maximum antibacterial activity has been checked for ethanolic extract of C.sativa against six bacteria by choosing three independent variables, temperature, pH, and concentration. In in-Silico studies, homology, threading approach, structure prediction, ligands designing and docking studies was performed against the antimicrobial target sequences for Beta-Lactamase, GABA Receptor, Lipoteichoic Acid, N-Acetylglucosamine (NAG), Peptidoglycan and Topoisomerase-IV through FASTA format from UniProt for structure prediction.

Results: The results indicated that the three concentrations were effective against tested bacteria. Moreover, effect of pH caused a significant variation in zone of inhibition. The graphs presented in this study indicate the highest zone of inhibition for plant extract; have been achieved at concentration of 10.0, pH 5.1 and temperature 37.5°C. It shows that by keeping the pH low, antibacterial activity will increase. Through the multiple regression analysis on the experimental data, the fitted regression model for the response variable and the test variable x1, x2, x3 are correlated by the second order polymeric equation.

Conclusion: It has been concluded that C.sativa can be considered as an effective drug in curing diseases caused by bacteria. Using the optimized values of temperature and pH analyzed in this experiment.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41324030

“Humans have been employing C.sativa since ancient times, and numerous historians have recorded multiple uses of this plant abroad. This plant has been cultivated for religious and recreational purposes, as well as for food, fiber, and oil, according to recorded history. C.sativa is also used therapeutically to treat depression, inflammation, and chronic pain, according to numerous ethnobotanical surveys.”

“This study is the continuation of the research to examine the effectiveness of ethanolic extracts made from C. sativa leaves against harmful microorganisms in humans. The results show that this extract has strong antibacterial activity against a variety of pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus which is affected more strongly by the pH and temperature variations rather than the concentrations of the extract. Moreover, it is confirmed by the application of the RSM model which indicates its activity. The zones of inhibition produced in the repetitive study has been concluded that C. sativa may be qualified as the drug of the future that can be efficacious for combating bacterial infections. The said plant is of high importance to synthesize a very high potency antibacterial drug by using the optimized ranges of temperature and pH.”

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15593258251404067

Cannabis Use in Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence in the Netherlands

Introduction: The endocannabinoid system plays a role in sleep-wake regulation. In clinical practice, people with central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) frequently report use of cannabis.

Methods: We compared lifetime and current use of cannabis of people with CDH to the Dutch general population. Additionally, we assessed cannabis use in relation to hypersomnolence symptoms.

Results: In total, 76 (out of 88) patients completed the online questionnaire. Lifetime cannabis use (42% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) and current use (18% vs. 4%, p < 0.001) were higher in people with CDH compared to the Dutch general population. For 57% of patients currently using cannabis, improvements of at least one CDH symptom were the motivation for use. Additionally, 79% of current cannabis users reported cannabis-related effects on a symptom, which were mostly positive (43%), some negative (7%), or mixed effects (29%). Patients that stopped using mostly started using cannabis before symptom onset and for recreational purposes. The most reported reasons to stop using were disadvantages of using or changes in the social environment.

Conclusion: This study provides a rationale for future research on the potential benefits of cannabis in CDH.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41321442

https://karger.com/mca/article/8/1/181/935204/Cannabis-Use-in-Central-Disorders-of

Evaluating cannabis substitution for alcohol within the context of a canadian managed alcohol program

Introduction: Managed Alcohol Programs (MAPs) provide beverage alcohol alongside housing and social supports to mitigate alcohol-related harms among individuals experiencing severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) and unstable housing. MAPs have been shown to stabilize alcohol use, reduce alcohol-related harms, improve quality of life, and decrease emergency service utilization. However, concerns about the long-term health risks associated with high levels of alcohol use have driven interest in cannabis substitution as an additional harm reduction strategy. Given the lower harm profile of cannabis, its integration into MAPs offers a promising avenue for further reducing alcohol-related harms. This study evaluates a novel cannabis substitution program within a Canadian MAP, leveraging the unique context of cannabis legalization and harm reduction programming.

Methods: Beginning in January 2023, participants (N = 35) were offered the choice of a pre-rolled cannabis joint or their prescribed alcohol dose multiple times per day. Data were drawn from five waves of quantitative surveys (January 2023 to February 2024; n = 20), two years of program records (January 2022 to February 2024; N = 35), and qualitative interviews (n = 14). Hierarchical mixed-effects models were used to predict alcohol use by cannabis use and time. Qualitative data were analyzed using interpretive description methodology.

Results: The final model found evidence of a substitution effect: participants who used more cannabis on average also consumed less alcohol overall. Specifically, each additional 0.4-gram joint consumed (approximately 15.2 standard THC units or 76 mg THC) was associated with an estimated 2.43 fewer mean daily standard drinks. Within-person cannabis use was not a significant predictor, indicating that short-term fluctuations in cannabis use were not associated with concurrent changes in alcohol consumption. Alcohol use also declined over time. Qualitative findings provide insights into the dynamic factors shaping drinking and cannabis use patterns.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential for cannabis substitution to meaningfully reduce alcohol-related harms. Implications for program development and future research evaluating changes in health, wellbeing, and harm outcomes are discussed.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41313909

“Emerging evidence suggests that cannabis substitution for alcohol may offer a promising approach to mitigating alcohol-related harms. Cannabis is associated with lower toxicity, fewer long-term health risks, and a lower likelihood of overdose compared to alcohol.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925003792?via%3Dihub

Cannabinomics in the flower of Cannabis sativa: a systematic review of extraction, analytical identification, and micro/nanoencapsulation methods for bioactive metabolites

Introduction: The use of Cannabis sativa has evolved from textile applications in ancient times to a growing interest in its therapeutic and nutraceutical properties. Its regulation varies worldwide, with restrictions on ∆9-THC concentrations depending on the country. Cultivation factors, such as temperature, humidity and photoperiod, affect the concentration of their bioactive metabolites, among which phytocannabinoids have demonstrated impact on the biological regulation of the human organism. Their application in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food industries has prompted research into the optimization of their production and extraction.

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify methodologies for the extraction, analysis and application of cannabinoids in various industries, focusing on agro-industrial transformation to increase their added value and optimize their therapeutic use.

Methodology: A systematic search was performed in the Scopus database on November 14, 2024, identifying keywords and their synonyms for each research question, using Boolean operators. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 related to cannabinoid extraction, identification and application methodologies were included, excluding non-scientific papers. The PRISMA methodology was applied to filter and select articles.

Results: The studies analyzed show that extraction and metabolomic analysis methodologies have gained relevance in recent years, especially for obtaining bioproducts for therapeutic purposes. It was identified that cannabinoids, mainly THC and CBD, have potential in the treatment of inflammatory, neurological and chronic pain diseases. In addition, the application of emerging technologies for the micro and nanoencapsulation of cannabinoids, optimizing their bioavailability, was evidenced. However, there are still gaps in the literature on the correlation between extraction operating conditions and the efficiency of the final product, which hinders its industrial scalability.

Conclusions: The growing interest in Cannabis sativa research has led to the exploration of various techniques for the extraction and analysis of its metabolites. However, despite advances in laboratory methodologies, the industrial application of these processes remains a challenge. The lack of studies correlating operational variables with extraction efficiency limits the standardization of bioproducts. Future research should focus on articulating technology and applied science to establish production models to improve the traceability and safety of Cannabis sativa extracts, favoring their integration into the pharmaceutical and agro-industrial industry.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41291955

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42238-025-00350-3