“Objective: Cannabis use has increased among older adults, yet the neurocognitive effects in this demographic remain unclear. Prior work has suggested cannabis may increase brain volume in areas rich in cannabinoid (CB1) receptors, though negative effects are often reported in adolescents. This study sought to clarify the relationship between cannabis use and brain health among middle-aged and older adults.
Method: Using data from the UK Biobank, which includes health information from over 500,000 adults, associations between cannabis use, regional brain volume, and cognition in participants aged 40-70 years (mean age = 54.5) were evaluated.
Results: Lifetime cannabis use was positively associated with regional brain volume in CB1-rich regions, including the caudate, putamen, hippocampus, and amygdala. Greater lifetime use was also linked to better performance in learning, processing speed, and short-term memory. Individuals reporting use limited to adolescence also showed larger regional volumes and better cognitive performance than non-users. Sex differences in cannabis effects on brain volume and cognition were also observed.
Conclusions: Results highlight that cannabis may influence brain health differently across the lifespan, potentially offering protective effects in older age while posing risks earlier in development. Protective effects may result from endocannabinoid-mediated modulation of inflammation, immune function, and neurodegeneration. Observed sex differences likely reflect variation in the endocannabinoid system and underscore the importance of considering sex as a biological variable in studies of cannabis and brain health.”
“Cannabis sativa L. is a plant that contains numerous chemically active compounds including cannabinoids such as trans-Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and flavone derivatives, such as luteolin-7-O-glucuronide and apigenin glucuronide.”
“These extracts could be a source of compounds with potential benefit on human health, especially related to neurodegenerative disorders.”
“In conclusion, this study provided new insights into the biological activities of two different extracts of C. sativa. It was revealed that these extracts constitute a valuable and interesting natural source of bioactive molecules with great antioxidant properties, potentially capable of preventing neurodegenerative diseases.”
“Importance: Agitation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a great source of distress for patients and caregivers and a major public health burden. Current treatments are only modestly effective and many have safety issues including mortality risk. Novel therapeutic options are needed.
There is preliminary evidence for the safety and efficacy of dronabinol (tetrahydrocannabinol, THC) for agitation in AD.
Objective: Assess the safety and efficacy of dronabinol (THC) to decrease agitation in AD.
Design: THC-AD was a 3-week randomized parallel double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, conducted between 2017 and 2024.
Setting: 5 inpatient and outpatient academic clinical research centers in the Eastern U.S.
Participants: Volunteer sample of 75 participants meeting inclusion criteria for agitation of AD (International Psychogeriatric Association Provision Criteria) with Neuropsychiatric Inventory Clinician Version Agitation or Aggression (NPI-C A/A) domains total score of 4 or greater. Major exclusion criteria included seizure disorder, delirium, and non-AD dementia.
Interventions: 3 weeks dronabinol vs. placebo titrated up to target dose of 10 mg daily in divided twice-daily.
Main outcomes and measures: Prespecified co-primary agitation outcomes were the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS) and NPI-C A/A total score.
Results: The majority of participants were female and were taking concomitant psychotropic medications (antidepressants and antipsychotics) at baseline. Study participants were moderately agitated at baseline, were diverse in ethnic background (9% Black, 11% Hispanic/Latina/Latino), and had severe cognitive impairment evidenced by MMSE or SIB-8. 84% completed the 3-week trial.
Dronabinol decreased agitation on both primary outcomes greater than placebo to a clinically relevant extent. The fitted between-arm difference in PAS decline/week was -0.74 (SE 0.3, p = 0.015, effect size = 0.53) and for NPI-C A/A the decline was not significant at -1.26 (SE 0.67, p = 0.094, effect size = 0.36). No secondary outcomes differed between treatment arms including sleep, activities of daily living, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), cognition, intoxication, or use of ‘as-needed’ lorazepam or trazodone. Dronabinol treatment was not associated with greater intoxication nor with other adverse events (AEs) except for somnolence.
Conclusions and relevance: Adjunctive dronabinol treatment was safe and effective for treating agitation in AD.”
•What is the primary question addressed by this study?
Is dronabinol (synthetic THC) a safe and effective treatment for reducing agitation in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease?
•What is the main finding of this study?
In a 3-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 75 participants with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease, dronabinol significantly reduced agitation as measured by the Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (effect size = 0.53) and showed a trend toward improvement on the NPI-C Agitation/Aggression domain. The medication was well tolerated, with somnolence as the only notable side effect and no increased risk of delirium, falls, or intoxication.
•What is the meaning of the finding?
These results suggest that dronabinol may be a relatively safe and effective pharmacologic option for managing agitation in Alzheimer’s disease.”
“Although tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have been individually studied for their neuroprotective roles, few studies have addressed the effects of their balanced 1:1 formulation Satinex (STX) under pathologic conditions like hypoxia. Moreover, the effect of STX on embryonic neural stem/progenitor cells (ENS/PCs) derived from the rat embryonic brain, which are highly vulnerable during early development, remains unexplored.
Considering the pivotal role of hypoxia in numerous neuropathological situations, this study examined the impact of STX on rat ENS/PCs exposed to chemically induced hypoxia.
ENS/PCs were isolated from rat embryos and subjected to hypoxia using 100 µM cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl₂0.6 H₂O) for 48 h. Cytotoxic activity of STX andCoCl2was assessed using the 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2 H-tetrazolium (MTT) assay, while stem cell identity was confirmed via flow cytometry (Nestin, SOX2). STX (0.1 and 0.5 µM) was applied under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (Hif1α) mRNA, autophagy markers (Beclin-1, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3-II [LC3-II]), and pro-inflammatory proteins nuclear factor kappa B [NF-κB], Toll-like receptor 2 [TLR2], Toll-like receptor 4 [TLR4]) were assessed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blot techniques following STX treatment.
Based on flow cytometric assays, over 70% of cultivated cells were positive for Nestin and SOX2. Hypoxia significantly reduced cell viability and proliferation, accompanied by increased Hif1α mRNA expression. Treatment with STX (0.1 µM and 0.5 µM) significantly reversed these changes, restoring cell viability and proliferation while reducing Hif1α levels. Hypoxia also elevated autophagy markers (Beclin-1, LC3-II) and pro-inflammatory proteins (NF-κB, TLR2, TLR4), which STX suppressed in a dose-dependent manner.
This study provides novel evidence that STX mitigates hypoxia-induced neural damage by downregulating Hif1α and its downstream inflammatory and autophagic signaling pathways. The use of a clinically relevant cannabinoids mixture and a developmentally sensitive cell model underline the translational potential of balanced THC/CBD formulations in the treatment of hypoxia-related neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental conditions.”
“Background: Cannabis is a commonly used psychoactive drug, but its cognitive effects remain unclear, particularly in older adults. This study examined associations between past and present cannabis use and cognitive function among dementia-free older adults.
Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data were drawn from the UK Biobank, including adults aged ≥60 years. Cannabis use patterns were self-reported, and cognitive function was assessed via computerized tests of attention, executive function, processing speed, visual memory and working memory. Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for demographic, health and lifestyle-related covariates.
Results: Cross-sectional analyses included 67 713 participants; longitudinal analyses included 52 002 participants with two cognitive assessments (mean age 67.2 ± 4.4 years; 46.1% male). Lifetime cannabis users (17%) performed better across all cognitive domains: attention (B = 0.071), executive function (B = 0.047), processing speed (B = 0.363), visual (B = 0.062) and working memory (B = 0.181). Current use was associated with better working memory (B = 0.169). Mixed and contradictory results were found for early onset, duration and frequency of use with cognitive outcomes. Longitudinally, past use was associated with less decline in executive function, while longer duration of use predicted steeper decline in processing speed.
Conclusions: Cannabis use is not uniformly harmful to cognition in older adults. Past use was linked to better performance and slower decline in some cognitive domains. However, specific usage patterns, such as longer duration, were associated with poorer outcomes in other domains. These findings highlight the need for further research to clarify underlying mechanisms and guide evidence-based recommendations regarding cannabis use in aging populations.”
“Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition and neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau. Dysregulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β) promotes tau hyperphosphorylation and amplifies Aβ-induced neurotoxicity, driving pathogenesis. Despite extensive research, current therapies targeting these core mechanisms remain largely ineffective at halting disease progression.
Based on prior clinical and preclinical evidence, we hypothesize that cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid, may exert multitarget therapeutic effects in AD by modulating Aβ aggregation, tau hyperphosphorylation, and GSK3β activity.
We investigated CBD’s interactions with Aβ-42/40, tau, and GSK3β using molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and ADMET predictions.
Our results show that CBD binds to Aβ with binding free energies of -7.81 kcal/mol, -7.46 kcal/mol, and -7.25 kcal/mol, disrupting aggregation by interacting with key residues (HIS6, HIS13, HIS14, GLU14, GLU22, ASP15, and ASP23). MD simulations confirm that CBD destabilizes Aβ’s β-sheet structure, preventing fibril formation. CBD binds tau with binding free energies of -9.91 kcal/mol, -9.70 kcal/mol, and -9.66 kcal/mol, disrupting tau aggregation and preventing neurofibrillary tangle formation. MD simulations show that CBD induces structural changes in tau, reducing β-sheet packing and inhibiting tau-tau interactions. CBD also binds to GSK3β with binding energies of -8.94 kcal/mol, -8.51 kcal/mol, and -8.41 kcal/mol, competing with ATP to inhibit its kinase activity and reduce tau phosphorylation. ADMET analysis indicates CBD’s favorable oral bioavailability and low toxicity.
These findings support CBD as a promising multitarget therapeutic for AD, warranting further preclinical and clinical investigations.”
“Background: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect patients’ and caregivers’ well-being. Cannabinoids may offer a promising therapeutic option for managing BPSD.
Aims: This systematic review aims to explore the strengths of using this class of substances in the context of dementia care.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science, identifying 1839 studies, with 14 selected for full review. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and the modified Jadad Scales.
Results/outcomes: Ten studies (278 participants) were finally included. They showed cannabinoids helped reduce agitation and nocturnal disturbances.
Conclusions/interpretation: In conclusion, cannabinoids show promise in managing BPSD in dementia, with good tolerability and safety. Further studies could solidify these findings.”
“Oral administration of drugs in laboratory rodents such as rats is conventionally performed using the gavage technique. Despite effectiveness, gavage can induce distress associated with restraint, especially following repeated animal handling.
To mitigate these adverse effects and reduce morbidity associated with traditional methods, we explored oromucosal/buccal administration of cannabidiol (CBD)-enriched Cannabis extract.
In this method, male rats were treated daily for 15 days with medium-chain triglycerides (TCM) derived from coconut oil or CBD-enriched Cannabis extract. Each treatment was administered individually while animals were gently immobilized using an affectionate touch technique. The administration involved the use of a micropipette to apply the oily formulation directly into the oral mucosa. The dosage was calculated based on the CBD concentration in the Cannabis extract, standardized at 3 mg/kg/day. To ensure accuracy, animals were weighed daily, allowing for dose adjustments in accordance with weight changes over the treatment period. This method offers non-invasive and stress-reducing treatment, potentially improving animal welfare in experimental settings.
The treatment with CBD-enriched Cannabis extract was safe, and the analysis of the hippocampus of these animals’ showed alterations in the expression levels of GluA1 and GFAP proteins, which are directly associated with glutamatergic receptor functionality and neuroinflammation, respectively. This suggests that Cannabis extract could be applied in pathological conditions where glutamatergic excitotoxicity and astrogliosis are observed.”
“Background: Cannabis constituents, including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), show distinct pharmacological profiles with therapeutic relevance for neurological and psychiatric conditions. THC exerts euphoric effects primarily via CB1 receptor activation, while CBD displays non-euphoric properties affecting various pathways.
Aims: This study evaluated the effects of THC, CBD, and their combination on brain functional connectivity (FC) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) using multimodal neuroimaging.
Methods: Adult male Sprague Dawley rats received intraperitoneal doses of 10 mg/kg THC, 150 mg/kg CBD, 10.8:10 mg/kg THC:CBD, or vehicle. Resting-state blood oxygenation level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and arterial spin labelling assessed FC and CBF, approximately 2 h after drug administration. Graph-theory metrics and seed-based analyses identified connectivity and perfusion alterations, while plasma analyses determined cannabinoid concentrations.
Results: THC increased whole-brain FC and clustering coefficient, with elevated CBF in cortical and subcortical regions. CBD decreased FC metrics without affecting CBF, while THC:CBD induced moderate increases in both. Seed-based analysis revealed THC-driven increases in cortical-hippocampal and cortical-striatal connectivity, attenuated in the THC:CBD group. A multivariate combined analysis of FC and CBF revealed a divergent pattern of changes induced by each drug.
Conclusions: In conclusion, we show that THC and CBD induce distinct neurophysiological profiles in rats, with THC increasing both connectivity and perfusion, moderated by CBD when combined. These findings corroborate existing knowledge about the effects of cannabinoids on the brain, while also supporting the potential of preclinical functional neuroimaging to delineate cannabinoid-induced endophenotypes, offering insights for therapeutic development.”
“Growing evidence supports the therapeutic potential of cannabis and its constituent phytocannabinoids in treating a range of neurological and psychiatric conditions.”
“In summary, we have demonstrated that acute THC administration resulted in increases in FC and regional CBF, acute CBD administration resulted in an overall reduction in FC with negligible effect on CBF, and the combination drug THC:CBD resulted in effects similar to, but lower than THC alone. Our application of functional neuroimaging has thus identified differential pharmacodynamic signatures for THC and CBD in anaesthetised adult male rats. Further work should encompass an investigation of the effects of sub-chronic administration of phytocannabinoids on brain activity in animal models with relevance to selected disease indications to investigate changes on FC in a perturbed system, more applicable to the disease state. “
“Cannabidiol (CBD) has gained a lot of interest in recent years for its purported medicinal properties. CBD has been investigated for the treatment of anxiety, depression, epilepsy, neuroinflammation, and pain.
Recently there has been an interest in CBD as a possible treatment for age-related disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (ADRD). Here we tested the hypothesis that chronic CBD administration would improve learning and memory in the SAMP8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease.
SAMP8 mice aged 11 months (at the start of the study) were administered vehicle or CBD (3 or 30 mg/Kg) daily via oral gavage for 2 months. Vehicle-treated young SAMP8 mice (age 3 months at the start of the study) served as unimpaired controls. After 30 days of treatment (4 and 12 months of age), learning and memory, activity, anxiety, strength and dexterity were assessed.
High dose CBD treatment significantly improved learning and memory of the 12-month-old mice in the T maze. Novel object recognition memory was also improved by CBD in aged CBD treated mice. Aged CBD treated mice also displayed less anxiety in the elevated plus maze test compared to controls. However, activity and strength levels were similar between groups. Biochemical analysis revealed decreased markers of oxidative stress, providing a possible mechanism by which CBD treatment impacts learning, memory, and anxiety.
These results highlight the potential use of CBD as a therapeutic for age related cognitive impairment and dementia.”
“Cannabidiol (CBD) is an abundant phytocannabinoid found in the Cannabis sativa plant.”
“CBD is thought by many to have medicinal properties. Except for a few conditions including two rare forms of epilepsy and multiple-sclerosis-associate spasticity, CBD has not been approved by the FDA”
“Here, we examine the potential use of CBD in treating age- related memory loss, anxiety, strength and dexterity impairment in the Senescence-accelerated mouse -prone 8(SAMP8) mice, a polygenic model of spontaneous onset AD.”
“Our results indicate that CBD can reverse age-related changes in the SAMP8 mice. CBD reversed memory impairment in both the T-maze and NOR with a 24-hour retention interval. These results indicate that CBD is able to reverse memory impairment in both spatial and recognition tasks. Taken together therefore, there appears to be an antioxidant effect of CBD contributing to the improvement in memory in the aged mice. These results show that CBD is an attractive therapeutic warranting further investigation in AD, and other neurodegenerative diseases.”
