Clinical Use of Cannabinoids for Symptom Control in Multiple Sclerosis.

“The endocannabinoid system was discovered in 1988 but has received little attention for its potential therapeutic possibilities.

That has started to change, and since 2000, a significant number of clinical trials of cannabinoids, principally for the control of spasticity in multiple sclerosis, have been undertaken. These studies have been difficult because of the nature of the disease and have involved patients for whom other therapies have failed or proved inadequate.

This paper outlines the background to the use of cannabinoids available and discusses the principles of practice associated with their safe use.

The focus has been on nabiximols, being the most studied and the only cannabinoid that has been both adequately researched for use in multiple sclerosis and granted a license by the regulators. However, what has emerged is that the effect for many patients can be much wider than just control of spasticity.

Within and outside of neurology there seems to be an expanding range of possibilities for the therapeutic use of cannabinoids.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289248

http://www.thctotalhealthcare.com/category/multiple-sclerosis-ms/

Cannabinoids and Glucocorticoids in the Basolateral Amygdala Modulate Hippocampal-Accumbens Plasticity after Stress.

“Acute stress results in release of glucocorticoids which are potent modulators of learning and plasticity. This process is presumably mediated by the basolateral amygdala (BLA) where cannabinoids CB1 receptors play a key role in regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

Growing attention has been focused on nucleus accumbens (NAc) plasticity which regulates mood and motivation. The NAc integrates affective and context dependent input from the BLA and ventral subiculum (vSub), respectively.

Since our previous data suggest that the CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist RU-38486 (RU) can prevent the effects of stress on emotional memory, we examined whether intra-BLA WIN and RU can reverse the effects of acute stress on NAc plasticity…

The results suggest that glucocorticoid and cannabinoid systems in the BLA can restore normal function of the NAc and hence may play a central role in the treatment of a variety of stress-related disorders.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289146

Monoacylglycerol Lipase Regulates Fever Response.

“Cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as ibuprofen have been used for decades to control fever through reducing the levels of the pyrogenic lipid transmitter prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Historically, phospholipases have been considered to be the primary generator of the arachidonic acid (AA) precursor pool for generating PGE2 and other eicosanoids. However, recent studies have demonstrated that monoacyglycerol lipase (MAGL), through hydrolysis of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol, provides a major source of AA for PGE2 synthesis in the mammalian brain under basal and neuroinflammatory states. We show here that either genetic or pharmacological ablation of MAGL leads to significantly reduced fever responses in both centrally or peripherally-administered lipopolysaccharide or interleukin-1β-induced fever models in mice. We also show that a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist does not attenuate these anti-pyrogenic effects of MAGL inhibitors. Thus, much like traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, MAGL inhibitors can control fever, but appear to do so through restricted control over prostaglandin production in the nervous system.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287872

Cannabinoids and Epilepsy.

“Cannabis has been used for centuries to treat seizures.

Recent anecdotal reports, accumulating animal model data, and mechanistic insights have raised interest in cannabis-based antiepileptic therapies.

In this study, we review current understanding of the endocannabinoid system, characterize the pro- and anticonvulsive effects of cannabinoids [e.g., Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol (CBD)], and highlight scientific evidence from pre-clinical and clinical trials of cannabinoids in epilepsy.

These studies suggest that CBD avoids the psychoactive effects of the endocannabinoid system to provide a well-tolerated, promising therapeutic for the treatment of seizures, while whole-plant cannabis can both contribute to and reduce seizures.

Finally, we discuss results from a new multicenter, open-label study using CBD in a population with treatment-resistant epilepsy. In all, we seek to evaluate our current understanding of cannabinoids in epilepsy and guide future basic science and clinical studies.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26282273

The emerging role of the endocannabinoid system in the pathogenesis and treatment of kidney diseases.

“Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are endogenous lipid ligands that bind to cannabinoid receptors that also mediate the effects of marijuana.

The eCB system is comprised of eCBs, anandamide, and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol, their cannabinoid-1 and cannabinoid-2 receptors (CB1 and CB2, respectively), and the enzymes involved in their biosynthesis and degradation.

It is present in both the central nervous system and peripheral organs including the kidney.

The current review focuses on the role of the eCB system in normal kidney function and various diseases, such as diabetes and obesity, that directly contributes to the development of renal pathologies.

Normally, activation of the CB1 receptor regulates renal vascular hemodynamics and stimulates the transport of ions and proteins in different nephron compartments. In various mouse and rat models of obesity and type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, eCBs generated in various renal cells activate CB1 receptors and contribute to the development of oxidative stress, inflammation, and renal fibrosis.

These effects can be chronically ameliorated by CB1 receptor blockers.

In contrast, activation of the renal CB2 receptors reduces the deleterious effects of these chronic diseases.

Because the therapeutic potential of globally acting CB1 receptor antagonists in these conditions is limited due to their neuropsychiatric adverse effects, the recent development of peripherally restricted CB1 receptor antagonists may represent a novel pharmacological approach in treating renal diseases.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26280171

Synthesis and biological evaluation of (3′,5′-dichloro-2,6-dihydroxy-biphenyl-4-yl)-aryl/alkyl-methanone selective CB2 inverse agonist.

“Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) selective agonists and inverse agonists possess significant potential as therapeutic agents for regulating inflammation and immune function.

Although CB2 agonists have received the greatest attention, it is emerging that inverse agonists also manifest anti-inflammatory activity.

In process of designing new cannabinoid ligands we discovered that the 2,6-dihydroxy-biphenyl-aryl methanone scaffold imparts inverse agonist activity at CB2 receptor without functional activity at CB1. To further explore the scaffold we synthesized a series of (3′,5′-dichloro-2,6-dihydroxy-biphenyl-4-yl)-aryl/alkyl-methanone analogs and evaluated the CB1 and CB2 affinity, potency, and efficacy.

The studies reveal that an aromatic C ring is required for inverse agonist activity and that substitution at the 4 position is optimum. The resorcinol moiety is required for optimum CB2 inverse agonist activity and selectivity. Antagonist studies against CP 55,940 demonstrate that the compounds 41 and 45 are noncompetitive antagonists at CB2.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275680

Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Agitation and Aggression in Alzheimer’s Disease.

“Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is frequently associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) such as agitation and aggression, especially in the moderate to severe stages of the illness. The limited efficacy and high-risk profiles of current pharmacotherapies for the management of agitation and aggression in AD have driven the search for safer pharmacological alternatives.

Over the past few years, there has been a growing interest in the therapeutic potential of medications that target the endocannabinoid system (ECS).

The behavioural effects of ECS medications, as well as their ability to modulate neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, make targeting this system potentially relevant in AD.

This article summarizes the literature to date supporting this rationale and evaluates clinical studies investigating cannabinoids for agitation and aggression in AD.

Letters, case studies, and controlled trials from four electronic databases were included. While findings from six studies showed significant benefits from synthetic cannabinoids-dronabinol or nabilone-on agitation and aggression, definitive conclusions were limited by small sample sizes, short trial duration, and lack of placebo control in some of these studies.

Given the relevance and findings to date, methodologically rigorous prospective clinical trials are recommended to determine the safety and efficacy of cannabinoids for the treatment of agitation and aggression in dementia and AD.”

The Endocannabinoid System and its Modulation by Phytocannabinoids

“The endocannabinoid system is currently defined as the ensemble of the two 7-transmembrane-domain and G protein-coupled receptors for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (but not for most other plant cannabinoids or phytocannabinoids)—cannabinoid receptor type-1 (CB1R) and cannabinoid receptor type-2 (CB2R); their two most studied endogenous ligands, the “endocannabinoids” N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG); and the enzymes responsible for endocannabinoid metabolism.

However, anandamide and 2-AG, and also the phytocannabinoids, have more molecular targets than just CB1R and CB2R.

Furthermore, the endocannabinoids, like most other lipid mediators, have more than just one set of biosynthetic and degrading pathways and enzymes, which they often share with “endocannabinoid-like” mediators that may or may not interact with the same proteins as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and other phytocannabinoids.

In some cases, these degrading pathways and enzymes lead to molecules that are not inactive and instead interact with other receptors.

Finally, some of the metabolic enzymes may also participate in the chemical modification of molecules that have very little to do with endocannabinoid and cannabinoid targets.

Here, we review the whole world of ligands, receptors, and enzymes, a true “endocannabinoidome”, discovered after the cloning of CB1R and CB2R and the identification of anandamide and 2-AG, and its interactions with phytocannabinoids.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26271952

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13311-015-0374-6

Safety and Toxicology of Cannabinoids.

“There is extensive research on the safety, toxicology, potency, and therapeutic potential of cannabis.

However, uncertainty remains facilitating continued debate on medical and recreational cannabis policies at the state and federal levels.

This review will include a brief description ofcannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system; a summary of the acute and long-term effects of cannabis; and a discussion of the therapeutic potential of cannabis.

The conclusions about safety and efficacy will then be compared with the current social and political climate to suggest future policy directions and general guidelines.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26269228

Dissecting the cannabinergic control of behavior: The where matters.

“The endocannabinoid system is the target of the main psychoactive component of the plant Cannabis sativa, the Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

This system is composed by the cannabinoid receptors, the endogenous ligands, and the enzymes involved in their metabolic processes, which works both centrally and peripherally to regulate a plethora of physiological functions.

This review aims at explaining how the site-specific actions of the endocannabinoid system impact on memory and feeding behavior through the cannabinoid receptors 1 (CB1 R).

Centrally, CB1 R is widely distributed in many brain regions, different cell types (e.g. neuronal or glial cells) and intracellular compartments (e.g. mitochondria).

Interestingly, cellular and molecular effects are differentially mediated by CB1 R according to their cell-type localization (e.g. glutamatergic or GABAergic neurons).

Thus, understanding the cellular and subcellular function of CB1 R will provide new insights and aid the design of new compounds in cannabinoid-based medicine.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26260530