Delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol ameliorates murine autoimmune hepatitis and is associated with epigenetic modulation of immune responses

A new 2026 study published in International Immunopharmacology found that delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC) significantly reduced autoimmune hepatitis in mice while altering the immune responses responsible for liver inflammation. Researchers found that Δ8-THC reduced inflammatory immune cells and helped preserve immune cells involved in protecting the liver.

The researchers also uncovered a possible mechanism. Δ8-THC increased two microRNAs, miR-100-5p and miR-199a-3p, which suppressed mTOR signaling and shifted CD4+ T-cell development away from inflammatory Th1 and Th17 cells and toward regulatory T cells that help control excessive immune activity.

The authors concluded that Δ8-THC showed both hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory activity and highlighted its potential therapeutic value for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The study adds new evidence that cannabinoids may influence disease not only by reducing inflammation, but by changing the molecular and epigenetic pathways that regulate immune responses.

“Aim of the study: Cannabinoids have gained attention for their ability to modulate immune responses and suppress inflammation. However, the effect of Δ8-THC, a minor cannabinoid found in Cannabis, has not been explored in autoimmune hepatitis. To address knowledge gap, the present study aimed to investigate the hepatoprotective and immunoregulatory properties of Δ8-THC in experimental autoimmune hepatitis and to identify molecular and epigenetic mechanisms underlying its immunoregulatory effects.

Methods: miRNA sequencing and flow cytometric analysis were performed using hepatic immune cells from female C57BL/6 mice treated with ConA (12.5 mg/kg, i.v.) and Δ8-THC (20 mg/kg, i.p.). Differential miRNA expressions were analyzed using the edgeR, and miRNA targets were predicted using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Target gene expression was validated by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Functional assays including miRNA mimic/inhibitor transfection and CD4+ T-cell differentiation were performed to validate target gene regulation by miRNAs and its role in CD4+ T-cell differentiation.

Results: Δ8-THC markedly suppressed ConA-induced autoimmune hepatitis by restoring immune homeostasis within the liver through suppression of inflammatory monocytes, neutrophils, and natural killer cells, and preservation of tolerogenic Kupffer cells. In addition, Δ8-THC reshaped the hepatic lymphoid compartment, diminishing inflammatory CD4+ T-cell responses while favoring regulatory T-cell expansion. These effects were associated with the preservation of miR-100-5p and miR-199a-3p expression in the liver, whereas both miRNAs were markedly downregulated following ConA treatment. mTOR, a central regulator of T-cell differentiation, was identified as a target of these miRNAs. Consistent with these findings, Δ8-THC reduced mTOR expression and upregulated hepatoprotective miRNAs in both in vivo and in vitro models. Functional analyses with miRNA overexpression and inhibition approaches verified the direct regulation of mTOR by these miRNAs in T cells and RAW 264.7 cells. In naïve CD4+ T cells, miRNA gain- and loss-of-function experiments demonstrated that miR-100-5p/miR-199a-3p-mediated suppression of mTOR promotes regulatory T-cell differentiation while limiting Th1 and Th17 polarization.

Conclusion: Our results identify Δ8-THC as a promising hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory compound that ameliorates ConA-induced autoimmune hepatitis by influencing CD4+ T-cell differentiation potentially through the miR-100-5p/miR-199a-3p-mTOR axis, highlighting its potential therapeutic value in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42753324

“In conclusion, our findings suggest that Δ8-THC can mitigate ConA-induced hepatitis, potentially through epigenetic regulation involving microRNAs. Specifically, Δ8-THC improved liver function and reduced systemic and intrahepatic inflammation in ConA-exposed mice. These effects were associated with increased expression of miR-100-5p and miR-199a-3p in the liver, suggesting that these miRNAs may regulate mTOR signaling and contribute to the suppression of proinflammatory responses and promotion of anti-inflammatory pathways. Functional studies supported the involvement of these miRNAs in the regulation of mTOR signaling, CD4+ T-cell differentiation, and inflammatory responses.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567576926012518?via%3Dihub

Ten-year outcomes of medical cannabis for chronic low back pain: opioid reduction, pain relief, and functional improvement in 1,000 patients

A 2026 study published in the European Spine Journal followed 1,000 patients with chronic low back pain who had been using opioids for at least a year before beginning medical cannabis treatment. Researchers tracked changes in opioid use, pain, disability, and other medications over as long as 10 years.

Among the 638 patients who completed the full 10-year follow-up, average opioid use fell by 89.8%, while pain scores dropped by 84.2%. More than 91% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in opioid use, and 96.6% achieved at least a 30% reduction in pain. Disability scores also improved substantially over the study period.

The reductions were not limited to opioids. Use of benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, antidepressants, and other pain medications also declined. With a decade of follow-up, this study provides unusually long-term evidence that medical cannabis may play an important role in reducing pain, improving function, and decreasing dependence on multiple medications in people living with chronic low back pain.

“Purpose: To evaluate 10-year outcomes of medical cannabis therapy on opioid use, pain intensity, functional disability, concomitant medication use, and adverse events in cannabis-naïve chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, with particular attention to clinically meaningful outcomes defined by established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds.

Methods: Single-center longitudinal observational study of 1,000 consecutive cannabis-naïve CLBP patients from a registry database (2015-2024), reported following STROBE guidelines.

Primary outcome: morphine milligram equivalents (MMEQ).

Secondary outcomes: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, cannabis dosing patterns, adverse events, and concomitant medication use. Pre-specified MCID thresholds: ≥50% MMEQ reduction, ≥ 30% NRS reduction, ≥ 10-point ODI improvement. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for completers and linear mixed-effects models for sensitivity analyses.

Results: Of 1,000 enrolled patients, 638 (63.8%) completed 10-year follow-up. Among completers, MMEQ decreased from 62.8 ± 35.7 to 6.4 ± 7.1 mg/day (- 89.8%, p < 0.001); NRS from 8.71 ± 1.23 to 1.37 ± 1.71 (- 84.2%, p < 0.001); ODI from 52.9 ± 11.9% to 36.8 ± 14.9% (16.1-point reduction, – 30.4%, p < 0.001). MCID responders: 91.2% for MMEQ, 96.6% for NRS, 62.1% for ODI. Substantial polypharmacy reductions occurred: tramadol/tapentadol – 84.0% points (pp), benzodiazepines – 73.5 pp, SSRIs – 71.9 pp, gabapentinoids – 30.7 pp. True tolerability adverse events occurred in 11.4% of visits; serious psychiatric events in 0.02%.

Conclusions: In this uncontrolled observational study, medical cannabis therapy was associated with reductions in opioid use, pain intensity, and functional disability over 10 years, accompanied by polypharmacy reduction and acceptable tolerability. Effect sizes substantially exceeded RCT benchmarks (e.g., – 0.6 NRS difference vs. placebo in a recent phase 3 trial), suggesting observational biases contribute to these findings. These hypothesis-generating data warrant validation in randomized controlled trials.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42734834

“In this 10-year single-arm observational study, medical cannabis therapy was associated with reductions in opioid use (− 89.8%), pain intensity (− 84.2%), and functional disability (− 30.4%), with high proportions of patients achieving pre-specified MCID thresholds. Substantial polypharmacy reductions and acceptable tolerability were observed.”

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-026-10290-y

UK Medical Cannabis Registry: An Updated Analysis of Inflammatory Arthritis

A new analysis from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry reports sustained improvements in pain, sleep, and health-related quality of life among patients with inflammatory arthritis who were prescribed cannabis-based medicinal products.

The study followed 192 patients for up to 24 months. Improvements were reported across multiple pain measures at every follow-up point, including pain severity, pain interference, and overall pain scores. Sleep quality and general quality of life also improved compared with baseline.

Notably, many patients were prescribed THC-containing products, including dried cannabis flower and oils. The findings add long-term real-world evidence that prescribed cannabis medicines may help some people living with inflammatory arthritis.

“Aim: Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) are an emerging therapeutic option for pain in inflammatory arthritis, yet clinical evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate changes in pain-specific and general health-related outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with CBMPs and to characterize the safety profile by examining the incidence and nature of adverse events.

Methods: Patients treated with CBMPs for inflammatory arthritis-associated pain for ⩾24 months were identified from the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Primary outcomes included changes in patient-reported measures: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Visual Analogue Scale (Pain VAS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2), EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months vs baseline. Adverse events were recorded and analysed. Statistical significance was set at P < .050.

Results: A total of 192 patients met inclusion criteria. The CBMP initiation was associated with improvements in BPI Interference, BPI Severity, Pain VAS, SF-MPQ-2, SQS, and EQ-5D-5L index values at all follow-up time points (P < .010) and in GAD-7 scores up to 3 months (P < .001). Twenty-seven patients (14.06%) reported 296 adverse events: 126 (42.57%) mild, 132 (44.59%) moderate, and 38 (12.84%) severe. No life-threatening events occurred.

Conclusion: The CBMP therapy was associated with reductions in pain and improvements in health-related quality of life among individuals with inflammatory arthritis. Although causality cannot be inferred from this observational design, these findings support the need for randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of CBMPs for inflammatory arthritis-related pain.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42724108

“Overall, results of this study demonstrate reductions in pain severity and improvements in HRQoL for patients receiving CBMP treatment for chronic pain linked to inflammatory arthritis over a period of 24 months of follow-up. The CBMPs were generally well-tolerated, although the risk of AE and individual responses should be considered before commencing CBMP treatment.”

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11795441261480709

The Endocannabinoid System is No Longer the Limiting Factor: Why Policy and Stigma Continue to Delay Cannabinoid-Based Medicine

The science of the endocannabinoid system has advanced dramatically, but cannabinoid-based medicine is still being held back by forces outside the laboratory. This new Clinical Therapeutics commentary argues that the biological understanding of the endocannabinoid system is no longer the main limiting factor. The larger barriers are now policy, regulation, funding, access, and stigma.

According to the authors, restrictive and fragmented rules make cannabinoid research harder to conduct, while limited access to standardized products complicates rigorous clinical trials. At the same time, stigma within medicine can discourage research, education, prescribing, and open discussion with patients.

The message is simple: the remaining evidence gaps are not purely scientific. They are also structural. If cannabinoid-based medicine is going to move forward, policy and medical culture will have to catch up with what researchers already understand about the endocannabinoid system.

“Purpose: To examine whether the persistent gap between the extensive mechanistic knowledge of the Endocannabinoid System (ECS) and the limited number of high-quality randomized clinical trials of cannabinoid-based therapies primarily reflects scientific uncertainty or, instead, structural regulatory, economic, and social barriers.

Methods: This commentary critically synthesizes historical, regulatory, and contemporary evidence on cannabinoid research, integrating data from regulatory documents, international policy reports, clinical and observational studies, systematic reviews, and qualitative investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on barriers affecting access to standardized products, conduct of randomized clinical trials, public funding, product standardization, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions.

Findings: Although the ECS has been extensively characterized for more than three decades and cannabinoids demonstrate plausible pharmacological mechanisms across multiple therapeutic areas, clinical translation remains disproportionately limited. Persistent regulatory restrictions, inherited from prohibition policies, continue to delay access to standardized research material, increase the cost and complexity of clinical trials, and shift evidence generation toward observational designs. Regulatory fragmentation further compromises product standardization and study reproducibility, whereas persistent social and professional stigma reduces research activity, medical education, prescribing confidence, and patient disclosure, perpetuating a self-reinforcing cycle between limited evidence generation and clinical distrust.

Implications: The principal obstacle to cannabinoid-based medicine is no longer the biological understanding of the ECS but the structural environment surrounding cannabinoid research. Progress toward evidence-based clinical implementation will depend on regulatory harmonization, greater public investment in randomized clinical research, standardized pharmaceutical-quality products, and educational initiatives capable of reducing stigma among healthcare professionals. Recognizing the structural rather than scientific origin of the evidence gap is essential for informing future research priorities, editorial policies, and international regulatory strategies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42728140

“The ECS is no longer the main obstacle to cannabinoid therapeutics. Stigma and regulation continue to delay clinical translation. Standardized clinical research requires international regulatory reform. Medical education is crucial for evidence-based cannabinoid therapies.”

https://www.clinicaltherapeutics.com/article/S0149-2918(26)00317-6/fulltext

Combined Cannabidiol and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Modulate Inflammation and Nociceptive Signaling in Human Dental Pulp Cells

A new study using human dental pulp cells found that combining cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produced stronger anti-inflammatory effects than either cannabinoid alone. The combination reduced the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-12, and IL-1β while increasing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.

CBD and THC together also influenced important pathways involved in pain signaling and healing. Researchers reported increased expression of the cannabinoid receptors CNR1 and CNR2, modulation of TRPV1, and enhanced cell proliferation and migration. The combination also promoted mineralized nodule formation and increased markers associated with odontogenic differentiation and new blood-vessel formation.

The researchers concluded that combined CBD and THC show promise for promoting dental pulp healing by simultaneously influencing inflammation, nociceptive signaling, tissue repair, angiogenesis, and cell migration. The findings provide new evidence that cannabinoids may have potential applications in future vital pulp therapies designed to preserve and regenerate living dental tissue.

“Introduction: Dental pulp inflammation, caused by caries, trauma, or restorative operations, produces pain and slows regeneration. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinoids of Cannabis sativa, have effects on inflammation and pain relief. However, the impact of these factors on dental pulp healing is not understood. This study investigated the combined effects of CBD and THC in controlling inflammation and nociception during dental pulp repair.

Methods: Human dental pulp cells were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and treated with CBD (2.5 μg/mL), THC (0.6 μg/mL), and their combination. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-12 and IL-1β) and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were analysed using qPCR and ELISA, while anti-nociceptive markers (CNR1, CNR2, and TRPV1) were evaluated by qPCR and Western blot. Cell viability, proliferation, and migration assays were performed to evaluate treatment effects on cellular behaviours associated with pulpal repair and regenerative potential.

Results: Compared with either treatment alone, the CBD/THC combination more effectively attenuated pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-12, and IL-1β, enhanced CNR1 and CNR2 expression, modulated TRPV1, and increased IL-10 expression. Viability assays determined optimal non-cytotoxic concentrations for treatment. The combination enhanced cell proliferation and migration, promoted mineralized nodule formation, and significantly upregulated markers associated with tissue repair, odontogenic differentiation (DMP1), and angiogenesis (VEGF and bFGF).

Conclusion: Combined CBD and THC show promise for promoting dental pulp healing by modulating inflammation and nociceptive signaling, while supporting odontogenic differentiation, angiogenesis, and cell migration in human dental pulp cells. These findings provide in vitro evidence supporting combined cannabinoid treatment as a therapeutic strategy for vital pulp therapies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42722230

https://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399(26)00500-5/abstract

Phytocannabinoids and bone health

A 2026 review published in Current Osteoporosis Reports examines growing evidence that phytocannabinoids may support bone health by influencing bone remodeling, inflammation, fracture healing, and bone loss.

The review highlights the endocannabinoid system as an important regulator of bone metabolism. Research involving CBD and THC shows that cannabinoids can affect osteoblasts, which build bone, and osteoclasts, which break bone down.

The review also discusses early human research showing that medical cannabis products containing THC and CBD reduced a blood marker associated with bone resorption. Together, the findings point to cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system as promising areas for further bone-health research.

“Purpose of the review: Phytocannabinoids have received attention for their therapeutic properties, however, it is unclear how they affect bone homeostasis. Additionally, increased use of cannabis and hemp-derived products have raised questions about their impact on musculoskeletal health. This review summarizes recent studies that investigate the impact of phytocannabinoids on bone.

Recent findings: The most well studied phytocannabinoid in relation to bone health is cannabidiol (CBD). In vitro data suggests CBD inhibits osteoclasts and promotes osteoblast activity. Rodent studies have demonstrated CBD may be useful for managing bone loss associated with osteoporosis and periodontitis, as well as reducing fracture pain and promoting healing. Recent studies suggest other phytocannabinoid isolates and extracts containing multiple phytocannabinoids have varying effects on bone. The first clinical study in this area reported that a medical cannabis product reduced markers of bone turnover in healthy adults. Cannabinoids bind to receptors in the endocannabinoid system which is involved in regulation of bone metabolism. Phytocannabinoids may improve bone health; however, additional work is required to determine factors such as the optimal dose, timing, and route of administration.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42709344

“Due to their diverse pharmacological properties, phytocannabinoids may have therapeutic value for bone-related disorders.”

 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11914-026-00982-1

Cannabis Medicine 2.0: Nanotechnology-Based Delivery Systems for Synthetic and Chemically Modified Cannabinoids for Enhanced Therapeutic Performance

Cannabinoid medicine is increasingly moving beyond conventional oils, capsules and extracts toward advanced drug-delivery technologies designed to improve how these compounds reach their targets in the body. This 2025 review examines how nanotechnology-based delivery systems may improve the solubility, stability, bioavailability and targeted delivery of synthetic and chemically modified cannabinoids.

Researchers reviewed nanoparticles, lipid-based carriers, micelles, nanoemulsions and other nanoengineered systems being developed for cannabinoid-related therapies. These technologies have been investigated in preclinical research involving conditions including neuropathic pain, depression and cancer, with some formulations producing longer-lasting or more targeted effects while reducing systemic exposure.

The authors conclude that combining cannabinoid pharmacology with nanotechnology could help create a new generation of more precise cannabinoid medicines, although most of these approaches remain in the preclinical stage and will require additional testing and regulatory development before widespread clinical use.

“The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids and other ligands of cannabinoid receptors attracts considerable attention due to their diverse pharmacological effects and utility in various medical applications. However, challenges such as low solubility, limited bioavailability, and potential side effects hinder their broad clinical use. Nanoformulation techniques offer a promising approach to address these issues and optimize the therapeutic effectiveness of cannabinoids and other cannabinoid receptor ligands.

This comprehensive review explores the advancements in nanoformulation strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy and safety of synthetic cannabinoids and related compounds, such as CB13, rimonabant, and HU-211, which have been studied in a range of preclinical models addressing conditions such as neuropathic pain, depression, and cancer.

The review discusses various nanocarriers employed in this field, including lipid-based, polymeric, and hybrid nanoparticles, micelles, emulsions, and other nanoengineered carriers. In addition to formulation approaches, this review provides an in-depth analysis of chemical structures and their effect on compound activity, especially in the context of the affinity for the cannabinoid type 1 receptor in the brain, which is chiefly responsible for the psychoactive effects.

The provided summary of research concerning either chemical modifications of existing cannabinoids or the creation of new compounds that interact with cannabinoid receptors, followed by the development of nanoformulations for these agents, allows for the identification of new research directions and future perspectives for Cannabis-based medicine.

In conclusion, the combination of nanotechnology and cannabinoid pharmacology holds promise for delivering more effective and safer therapeutic solutions for a broad spectrum of medical conditions, making this an exciting area of research with profound implications for the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries.”

“Nanotechnology-enabled delivery of synthetic and chemically modified cannabinoids offers a promising approach to overcome the intrinsic limitations of these compounds, positioning them as candidates for future precision therapeutics. Preclinical evidence supports their enhanced stability, bioavailability, and site-specific activity; however, translating these findings into clinical applications will require coordinated advances in innovation, manufacturing, and regulatory science. Nanoformulated cannabinoids have the potential to transform therapeutic strategies, but their clinical impact will depend on harmonized regulations, standardized testing, and robust translational research. With sustained international collaboration, these next-generation formulations may become a key component of personalized medicine in the coming decade.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12388155/

Nanotechnology for the Efficacious Delivery of Medicinal Cannabis and Pharmaceutical Medicines

Nanotechnology is creating new possibilities for the delivery of medicinal cannabis and pharmaceutical medicines. This 2025 narrative review examines how nanoscale delivery systems may help overcome common problems such as poor solubility, inconsistent absorption, low bioavailability, gastrointestinal degradation, and first-pass metabolism.

These challenges are especially relevant to cannabinoids such as THC and CBD because they are highly lipophilic compounds. The review discusses how nanoparticle systems may improve cannabinoid stability, targeting, controlled release, selectivity, and overall delivery while exploring alternative routes including oro-buccal, nasal, ocular, and transdermal administration.

The paper directly discusses THC, CBD, dronabinol, nabilone, nabiximols, high-THC cannabis, and NanoCelle™ formulations designed to deliver THC and CBD through the oral mucosa. The authors emphasize that nanotechnology may allow cannabinoid medicines to be delivered more precisely, with improved absorption and reduced loss through first-pass metabolism.

“The application of nanoparticles as nanomedicines, particularly for the targeted and efficacious delivery of drugs is an expanding platform in the field of cannabinoid and pharmaceutical drug delivery. By refocusing the route of drug administration beyond the oral gut pathway, this technology provides significant advancements that are especially relevant for cancer treatments. Orally administered drugs face significant challenges as they traverse the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and are subject to first-pass GIT metabolism. Physiological conditions encountered in the GIT such as food effects, hormones, gastric pH, emptying time, and intestinal transit time vary widely across individuals. Fluid composition and enzymatic activity in the small intestine and large bowel also influence drug dissolution and absorption. These factors in conjunction with the intestinal cohort of bacteria can metabolize drugs before absorption, contributing to poor and variable drug bioavailability, which can be exacerbated by gut dysbiosis. Drug delivery that bypasses the oral-GIT route and hence first-pass metabolism offers a plausible solution for enhanced safety and drug efficacy.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12472836

Exploring the Potential of Cannabinoid Nanodelivery Systems for CNS Disorders

Cannabinoids such as THC and CBD have shown therapeutic potential in neurological disorders, but poor water solubility and low bioavailability can limit their effectiveness. This review explores how nanotechnology may overcome these barriers by improving cannabinoid stability, controlled release and targeted delivery to the central nervous system, including strategies designed to enhance passage across the blood-brain barrier.

“Cannabinoids have a major therapeutic value in a variety of disorders. The concepts of cannabinoids are difficult to develop, but they can be used and are advantageous for a number of diseases that are not sufficiently managed by existing treatments. Nanoconjugation and encapsulation techniques have been shown to be effective in improving the delivery and the therapeutic effectiveness of drugs that are poorly soluble in water. Because the bioavailability of cannabinoids is low, the challenge is to explore different administration methods to improve their effectiveness. Because cannabinoids cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), they modify the negative effects of inflammatory processes on the BBB and may be a key factor in the improvement of BBB function after ischemic disease or other conditions. This review discusses various types of cannabinoid administration, as well as nanotechnologies used to improve the bioavailability of these compounds in CNS diseases.”

“The growing acceptance of Cannabis and cannabinoids has led to an increasing number of clinical trials testing various nanoproducts. CNS disorders are key therapeutic targets for cannabinoids, and nanoformulation platforms for cannabinoid nanoconjugates provide efficient transport across the BBB. Selected examples of cannabinoid nanoconjugates have shown enhanced bioavailability and improved bio-efficacy with promising outcomes in biomedical applications. We expect to see many results from clinical trials in the near future to evaluate the adverse effects and effectiveness of this treatment. However, precise delivery of these nanoformulations to pathological sites inside the brain remains a challenge.”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9863859/

A chronic low dose of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (3 mg / kg / 21 d) reorganizes the disturbed wound healing process and accelerates wound closure in old female mice

A chronic low dose of Δ9-THC accelerated wound closure in old female mice and helped reorganize an age-disrupted healing process. The biggest improvement occurred during the inflammatory phase, when aged wounds normally heal more slowly and remain inflamed longer.

THC changed the timing and amount of immune-cell activity in the wound, reduced inflammatory cytokines, and significantly increased infiltration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) involved in tissue repair. The treatment did not increase growth-factor release, suggesting the benefit came mainly from better coordination of inflammation and cell migration.

The researchers concluded that THC improved wound healing by restoring a more normal sequence of immune-cell infiltration and cytokine release. The findings suggest that stimulating the aging endocannabinoid system may help support skin regeneration and tissue repair in older organisms.

“Wound healing in old mice is characterized by disturbed tissue homeostasis, manifested by delayed immune cell infiltration and reduced growth factor secretion, leading to a delayed onset and prolonged duration of the inflammatory phase.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is an important regulator of tissue homeostasis and cell migration and is also considered to be subject to aging processes, which may contribute to observable aging phenomena. Therefore, stimulating the aged ECS could represent a therapeutic option to support tissue regeneration in aging.

Female old mice received a low-dose of medical THC daily for 3 weeks, before four excisional full skin wounds were created. At day 1, 3 and 7 post-surgery, the wound closure rate was analyzed and wound samples were examined immunohistochemically for the numbers of granulocytes, M1-macrophages and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines and regenerative growth factors were determined by ELISA.

Administration of THC improved the wound healing rate of old mice between day 1 and 7, which was associated with an altered timing and quantity of infiltrating immune cells and decreased levels of inflammatory cytokines in wound tissue on days 1 and 3 post-injury.

THC treatment significantly increased MSC infiltration but had no effect on the growth factor release.

The present study confirmed the anti-inflammatory activity of THC in vivo.

The THC-treatment improved wound healing in old mice by coordinating the temporal sequence of immune cell infiltration and cytokine release. Thus, restoration of ECS signaling could be an effective strategy to support age-related skin regeneration.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40653209/

“A chronic low dose of THC accelerates the wound closure rate during the inflammatory phase in old mice.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001615?via%3Dihub

Meed this THC study explained? thcXplained.com