CBD-oil as a potential solution in case of severe tamoxifen-related side effects

pubmed logo

“Tamoxifen may lead to bothersome side effects contributing to non-compliance and decreased quality of life.

Patients searching for relief are increasingly turning to cannabinoids such as CBD-oil. However, CBD-oil might affect tamoxifen pharmacokinetics (PK) through CYP2D6 inhibition. The aims of this open-label, single-arm study were (1) to determine the PK profile of tamoxifen when using CBD-oil, and (2) to subsequently investigate whether CBD-oil has a beneficial influence on side effects.

Study patients had to have steady-state endoxifen concentrations ≥16 nM (conservative threshold). PK sampling and side effect assessment was done at initiation of CBD-oil and 28 days thereafter. Bio-equivalence could be concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in endoxifen AUC fell within the [-20%; +25%] interval. The effect of CBD-oil on side effects was evaluated using the FACT-ES questionnaire.

Endoxifen AUC decreased after CBD-oil by 12.6% (n = 15, 90% CI -18.7%, -6.1%) but remained within bio-equivalence boundaries. The endocrine sub-scale of the FACT-ES improved clinically relevant with 6.7 points (n = 26, p < 0.001) and health-related quality of life improved with 4.7 points after using CBD (95% CI + 1.8, +7.6).

We conclude that CBD-oil, if of good quality and with a dosage below 50 mg, does not have to be discouraged in patients using it for tamoxifen-related side effects.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37543688/

“In conclusion, endoxifen levels remained within bio-equivalence boundaries when CBD-oil was used in combination with tamoxifen. Therefore, sublingual CBD-oil, if of good quality and not higher than the highest over-the-counter dose (<50 mg per day), does not have to be discouraged in patients using it as complementary medication. In addition, the use of CBD-oil in this single arm study resulted in a promising improvement in endocrine symptoms and quality of life, but the real effect of CBD-oil has yet to be proven in a placebo-controlled study that is currently being set up.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-023-00570-x

Cannabis sativa L. modulates altered metabolic pathways involved in key metabolisms in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells: A metabolomics study

pubmed logo

“The present study investigated the ability of Cannabis sativa leaves infusion (CSI) to modulate major metabolisms implicated in cancer cells survival, as well as to induce cell death in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. MCF-7 cell lines were treated with CSI for 48 h, doxorubicin served as the standard anticancer drug, while untreated MCF-7 cells served as the control. CSI caused 21.2% inhibition of cell growth at the highest dose. Liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) profiling of the control cells revealed the presence of carbohydrate, vitamins, oxidative, lipids, nucleotides, and amino acids metabolites. Treatment with CSI caused a 91% depletion of these metabolites, while concomitantly generating selenomethionine, l-cystine, deoxyadenosine triphosphate, cyclic AMP, selenocystathionine, inosine triphosphate, adenosine phosphosulfate, 5′-methylthioadenosine, uric acid, malonic semialdehyde, 2-methylguanosine, ganglioside GD2 and malonic acid. Metabolomics analysis via pathway enrichment of the metabolites revealed the activation of key metabolic pathways relevant to glucose, lipid, amino acid, vitamin, and nucleotide metabolisms. CSI caused a total inactivation of glucose, vitamin, and nucleotide metabolisms, while inactivating key lipid and amino acid metabolic pathways linked to cancer cell survival. Flow cytometry analysis revealed an induction of apoptosis and necrosis in MCF-7 cells treated with CSI. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of CSI revealed the presence of cannabidiol, rutin, cinnamic acid, and ferulic. These results portray the antiproliferative potentials of CSI as an alternative therapy for the treatment and management of breast cancer as depicted by its modulation of glucose, lipid, amino acid, vitamin, and nucleotide metabolisms, while concomitantly inducing cell death in MCF-7 cells.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37215911/

https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)03363-7?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS2405844023033637%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

Study of Cannabis Oils Obtained from Three Varieties of C. sativa and by Two Different Extraction Methods: Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activities

plants-logo

“Currently, much effort is being placed into obtaining extracts and/or essential oils from Cannabis sativa L. for specific therapeutic purposes or pharmacological compositions. These potential applications depend mainly on the phytochemical composition of the oils, which in turn are determined by the type of C. sativa and the extraction method used to obtain the oils.

In this work, we have evaluated the contents of secondary metabolites, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and cannabidiol (CBD), in addition to the total phenolic, flavonoids, and anthraquinone content in oils obtained using solid-liquid extraction (SLE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SCF). Different varieties of C. sativa were chosen by using the ratio of THC to CBD concentrations. Additionally, antioxidant, antifungal and anticancer activities on different cancer cell lines were evaluated in vitro.

The results indicate that oils extracted by SLE, with high contents of CBD, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds, exhibit a high antioxidant capacity and induce a high decrease in the cell viability of the tested breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). The observed biological activities are attributed to the entourage effect, in which CBD, phenols and flavonoids play a key role. Therefore, it is concluded that the right selection of C. sativa variety and the solvent for SLE extraction method could be used to obtain the optimal oil composition to develop a natural anticancer agent.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37176831/

“Different varieties of C. sativa identified by the ratio of THC:CBD were used to extract cannabis oil using two extraction methods. The evaluation of the biological activities of the oils indicates that they are mostly determined by their chemical composition. For example, all Cannabis oils exhibit an antioxidant capacity and antiproliferative effects on tested cancer cell lines. In both types of experiments, the most active Cannabis oil tested was M4, suggesting a direct relationship between its antioxidant capacity and cancer cell cytotoxicity. In addition, M4 exhibits a high selectivity against breast cancer cell lines, and, therefore, Cannabis oils can be considered potential anticancer agents.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/12/9/1772

Cannabidiol as a Promising Adjuvant Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Tumors: Unveiling Its Benefits with Aromatase Inhibitors

cancers-logo

“Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most diagnosed subtype, with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) being one of the therapeutic drug types used in the clinic. However, endocrine resistance may develop after prolonged treatment, and different approaches, such as combining endocrine and targeted therapies, have been applied. Recently, we demonstrated that cannabidiol (CBD) induces anti-tumor actions in ER+ breast cancer cells by targeting aromatase and ERs. Considering this, we studied, in vitro, whether CBD when combined with AIs could improve their effectiveness.

Methods: MCF-7aro cells were used and the effects on cell viability and on the modulation of specific targets were investigated.

Results: CBD when combined with anastrozole (Ana) and letrozole (Let) caused no beneficial effect in comparison to the isolated AIs. In contrast, when combined with the AI exemestane (Exe), CBD potentiated its pro-cell death effects, abolished its estrogen-like effect, impaired ERα activation, and prevented its oncogenic role on the androgen receptor (AR). Moreover, this combination inhibited ERK1/2 activation, promoting apoptosis. The study of the hormonal microenvironment suggests that this combination should not be applied in early stages of ER+ breast tumors.

Conclusions: Contrary to Ana and Let, this study highlights the potential benefits of combining CBD with Exe to improve breast cancer treatment and opens up the possibility of new therapeutic approaches comprising the use of cannabinoids.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37173983/

“Cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated important anti-tumor effects on ER+ breast cancer cells. Considering this, our goal was to evaluate the effects of combining CBD with the AIs currently in use in the clinical context. Our results revealed that CBD may be particularly beneficial when combined with the AI exemestane (Exe), since it potentiates the anti-tumor effects of Exe through the modulation of cell death and specific targets, including ERα and androgen receptor (AR). This reinforces the beneficial potential of cannabinoids in breast cancer and points to the possibility of improving Exe effects through an adjuvant therapy with CBD.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/9/2517

Therapeutic targeting of the tumor microenvironments with cannabinoids and their analogs: Update on clinical trials

pubmed logo

“Cancer is a major global public health concern that affects both industrialized and developing nations. Current cancer chemotherapeutic options are limited by side effects, but plant-derived alternatives and their derivatives offer the possibilities of enhanced treatment response and reduced side effects.

A plethora of recently published articles have focused on treatments based on cannabinoids and cannabinoid analogs and reported that they positively affect healthy cell growth and reverse cancer-related abnormalities by targeting aberrant tumor microenvironments (TMEs), lowering tumorigenesis, preventing metastasis, and/or boosting the effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Furthermore, TME modulating systems are receiving much interest in the cancer immunotherapy field because it has been shown that TMEs have significant impacts on tumor progression, angiogenesis, invasion, migration, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, metastasis and development of drug resistance.

Here, we have reviewed the effective role of cannabinoids, their analogs and cannabinoid nano formulations on the cellular components of TME (endothelial cells, pericytes, fibroblast and immune cells) and how efficiently it retards the progression of carcinogenesis is discussed. The article summarizes the existing research on the molecular mechanisms of cannabinoids regulation of the TME and finally highlights the human studies on cannabinoids’ active interventional clinical trials.

The conclusion outlines the need for future research involving clinical trials of cannabinoids to demonstrate their efficacy and activity as a treatment/prevention for various types of human malignancies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37146933/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935123006540?via%3Dihub

Phytocannabinoids in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Current Knowledge and Future Insights

Anticancer Research: 43 (3)

“Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents an aggressive subtype of breast cancer, which is deficient in estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. Thus, TNBC cells are unable to respond to the conventional hormonal therapies, making chemotherapy the only therapeutic choice. Patients with TNBC develop metastasis and recurrence over time and have reduced survival compared to patients with other subtypes of breast cancer. Therefore, there is a need for innovative therapies. Data emerged from pre-clinical studies, highlighted various antitumor activities of plant-derived Cannabis sativa and synthetic cannabinoids (CBs), including delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). On the contrary, some studies indicated that CBs might also promote tumor progression. At present, clinical studies on the effects of CBs from Cannabis sativa in cancer patients are few. In the present study, we reviewed known and possible interactions between cannabinoids and TNBC therapies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36854495/

“Overall, apart from the need for other studies aimed to dissect the molecular pathways underlying the antitumor CBs’ properties, phytocannabinoids should be considered as potential agents for inhibiting TNBC progression.”

https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/43/3/993

Comparative changes in breast cancer cell proliferation and signalling following somatostatin and cannabidiol treatment

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

“Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Somatostatin (SST) and Cannabinoids have an anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effect, but the mechanisms of their actions remain elusive.

In the present study, we have evaluated the effects of SST, Cannabidiol (CBD) alone or in combination on receptor expression, cell proliferation and apoptosis and related downstream signalling pathways in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

The results presented here demonstrate the cell type and agonist-dependent changes in receptor expression at the cell membrane, inhibition of cell proliferation and increased apoptosis following treatment with SST and CBD alone and in combination. In comparison to MDA-MB-231 cells, MCF-7 cells treated with SST alone and in combination with CBD exhibited inhibition of phosphorylated Protein Kinase B (pAKT) and phosphorylated-Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (pPI3K) expression. Importantly, inhibition of PI3K/AKT activation was accompanied by enhanced PTEN expression in MCF-7 cells.

These results highlight the possible interaction between SSTR and CBR subtypes with the implication in the modulation of receptor expression, cell viability and signal transduction pathways in a breast cancer cell type-dependent manner.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36586156/

“Marijuana (or cannabis) is a source of large numbers of compounds known as phytocannabinoids, such as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) that have therapeutic implications in cancer, pain, inflammation and neurological diseases.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X22017442?via%3Dihub

Structural analysis of cannabinoids against EGFR-TK leads a novel target against EGFR-driven cell lines

Current Research in Pharmacology and Drug Discovery

“Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the ErbB family of proteins and are involved in downstream signal transduction, plays prominent roles in cell growth regulation, proliferation, and the differentiation of many cell types. They are correlated with the stage and severity of cancer. Therefore, EGFRs are targeted proteins for the design of new drugs to treat cancers that overexpress these proteins. Currently, several bioactive natural extracts are being studied for therapeutic purposes.

Cannabis has been reported in many studies to have beneficial medicinal effects, such as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory effects, and antitumor activity. However, it is unclear whether cannabinoids reduce intracellular signaling by inhibiting tyrosine kinase phosphorylation. In this study, cannabinoids (CBD, CBG, and CBN) were simulated for binding to the EGFR-intracellular domain to evaluate the binding energy and binding mode based on molecular docking simulation.

The results showed that the binding site was almost always located at the kinase active site. In addition, the compounds were tested for binding affinity and demonstrated their ability to inhibit kinase enzymes. Furthermore, the compounds potently inhibited cellular survival and apoptosis induction in either of the EGFR-overexpressing cell lines.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36568260/

“Cannabinoids reduced cell viability in EGFR-positive cells A431 and A549 by decreasing the tyrosine-kinase phosphorylation activity of EGFR.•

In silico analysis shows that cannabinoids bind to the active site of the EGFR-tyrosine kinase by the hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bonding.•

CBD and CBG significantly induce cancer cells apoptosis in EGFR-positive cell A431.•

The consistent findings suggested that CBD and CBG could be developed as natural tumor-targeting agents for EGFR-positive cancers.

These findings demonstrate that the cannabinoids could be transformed into unique natural compounds for use in the development of anti-EGFR-positive cancer therapies.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590257122000529?via%3Dihub


Study of potential inhibition of the estrogen receptor α by cannabinoids using an in silico approach: Agonist vs antagonist mechanism

Computers in Biology and Medicine

“Breast cancer is the main cancer type with more than 2.2 million cases in 2020, and is the principal cause of death in women; with 685000 deaths in 2020 worldwide. The estrogen receptor is involved at least in 70% of breast cancer diagnoses, and the agonist and antagonist properties of the drug in this receptor play a pivotal role in the control of this illness.

This work evaluated the agonist and antagonist mechanisms of 30 cannabinoids by employing molecular docking and dynamic simulations. Compounds with docking scores < -8 kcal/mol were analyzed by molecular dynamic simulation at 300 ns, and relevant insights are given about the protein’s structural changes, centered on the helicity in alpha-helices H3, H8, H11, and H12.

Cannabicitran was the cannabinoid that presented the best relative binding-free energy (-34.96 kcal/mol), and based on rational modification, we found a new natural-based compound with relative binding-free energy (-44.83 kcal/mol) better than the controls hydroxytamoxifen and acolbifen. Structure modifications that could increase biological activity are suggested.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36543006/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010482522011118?via%3Dihub

The role of Cannabidiol and tetrahydrocannabivarin to overcome doxorubicin resistance in MDA-MB-231 xenografts in athymic nude mice

Biochimie

“The significant resistance to currently available chemotherapeutics makes treatment for TNBC a key clinical concern. Herein, we studied the anti-cancer potentials of synthetic cannabidiol (CBD) and Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) when used alone or in combination with doxorubicin (DOX) against MDA-MB-231 resistant cells. Pre-treatment with CBD and THCV significantly increased the cytotoxicity of DOX in MDA-MB-231 2D and 3D cultures that were DOX-resistant. Transcriptomics and Proteomics studies revealed that CBD and THCV, by downregulating PD-L1, TGF-β, sp1, NLRP3, P38-MAPK, and upregulating AMPK induced apoptosis leading to improved DOX’s chemosensitivity against DOX resistant MDA-MB-231 tumors in BALB/c nude mice. CBD/THCV in combination with DOX significantly inhibited H3k4 methylation and H2K5 acetylation as demonstrated by western blotting and RT-PCR. Based on these findings, CBD and THCV appear to counteract histone modifications and their subsequent effects on DOX, resulting in chemo-sensitization against MDA-MB-231 resistant cancers.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36535544/

“Cannabis anecdotally has been a folklore medicine for a longtime to treat a variety of disease states. In recent years, the therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids has garnered more acceptance in the public domain. Several Phyto-cannabinoids are available from the the plant Cannabis sativa along with terpenes and they target the endocannabinoid system and several other biological pathways. Hence, these agents can possibly have a array of therapeutic effects on the central nervous system and peripheral immune, cardiovascular, reproductive, and ocular systems.

Our findings show that CBD and THCV were found to overcome resistance against MDA-MB-231 resistant cell line in vitro in 2D and 3D cultures by several folds. Further, both these agents in combination with DOX showed synergism as determined by the isobolographic method.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300908422003327?via%3Dihub