“Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer presents a significant challenge in oncology due to its complex treatment and aggressive nature. This subtype lacks common cancer cell receptors like estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors. This study aimed to identify, through bioinformatic analysis, the key genes associated with triple-negative breast cancer. In addition, CBD analogs with potential inhibitory effects on these genes were evaluated through docking and molecular dynamics.

Methods: Gene expression profiles from the GSE178748 dataset were analyzed, focusing on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. Differentially expressed genes were determined through protein-protein interaction networks and subsequently validated. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of cannabidiol analogs on these hub genes were assessed using molecular docking and dynamics.

Results: Analysis of the hub highlighted RPL7A, NHP2L1, and PSMD11 as significant players in TNBC regulation. Ligand 44409296 showed the best affinity energy with RPL7A, while 166505341 exhibited the highest affinity with NHP2L1 and PSMD11, surpassing CBD. Analyses of RMSD, RMSF, SASA, and Gyration Radius indicated structural stability and interactions of the proteins with ligands over time. MMGBSA calculations showed favorable binding energies for the ligands with the target proteins.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study identified key genes, namely RPL7A, NHP2L1, and PSMD11, associated with triple-negative breast cancer and demonstrated promising interactions with cannabidiol analogs, particularly 44409296 and 166505341. These findings suggest potential therapeutic targets and highlight the relevance of further clinical investigations. Additionally, the ligands exhibited favorable ADME properties and low toxicity, underscoring their potential in future drug development for TNBC treatment.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38809637/

https://journal.waocp.org/article_91159.html

“Studies have shown that natural products can induce paraptosis in tumour cell lines. Paraptosis is characterized by cytoplasmic vacuolation arising from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. The mechanism of paraptosis is unclear; however, dysregulation of Ca²⁺ homeostasis is believed to affect paraptosis induction.

This study investigated the mechanism of cell death induced by a phytocannabinoid ratio in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line.

The crystal violet assay was used to detect changes in viability and morphology changes were investigated using light and transmission electron microscopy. Various inhibitors, fluorescent staining with high-content screening, and Western blot analysis were used to investigate different cell death mechanisms.

The phytocannabinoid ratio induced significant cell death and cytoplasmic vacuolation in MCF7 cells; however, no apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy, or ferroptosis was detected. Vacuolation induced by phytocannabinoid treatment was inhibited by cycloheximide, suggesting paraptosis induction. The mechanism of paraptosis induction was investigated, and it was found that treatment (1) induced ER dilation and mitochondrial swelling, (2) induced significant ER stress and mitochondrial Ca²⁺ overload and dysfunction, which appeared to be mediated by the voltage-dependent anion channel, and (3) significantly impaired all mitochondrial metabolic pathways.

The data demonstrated that paraptosis induced by the cannabinoid ratio was mediated by Ca²⁺ flux from the ER to the mitochondria.

These findings highlight a novel mechanism of cannabinoid-induced cell death and emphasize the anti-cancer potential of cannabinoid ratios, which exhibited enhanced effects compared to individual cannabinoids.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38721827/

” In the context of cancer, cannabinoids have primarily been used for their palliative effects to treat the side effects of chemotherapy; however, their tumour-suppressive properties have been known since the first observation of their antitumor effects in 1975.”

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpr.13650

“Cannabis sativa is a well-known plant for its psychoactive effects; however, its many derivatives, such as Cannabidiol (CBD), contain several therapeutic applications. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main cannabis derivative responsible for psychoactive properties, while CBD is non-psychotropic. For this reason, CBD has been more exploited in the last decade.

CBD has been connected to multiple anticancer properties, and when combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT), it is possible to eradicate tumors more effectively. In this study, CBD was utilized to treat MCF-7 breast cancer cells, followed by in vitro PDT combination therapy. Conventional breast cancer treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, etc. have been reported for inducing a number of undesirable side effects, recurrence of the disease, and low quality of life.

In this study, cells were exposed to varying concentrations of CBD (i.e., 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL) and incubated 12 and 24 h after treatment. The optimal doses were then used in combination therapy. Morphology and biochemical assays, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) for membrane integrity, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for viability, and trypan blue exclusion assay for viability, were used to examine cellular responses after treatments. The optimal concentration was then utilized in Hypericin-Gold nanoparticles mediated PDT combination.

The results revealed that, in a dose-dependent manner, conventional morphological characteristics of cell death, such as vacuolization, blebbing, and floating were observed in treated cells. The biochemical responses demonstrated an increase in LDH, a decrease in ATP, and a reduction in viability. This study demonstrated that CBD induces cell death in MCF-7 breast cancer cells cultured in vitro. The immunofluorescence results of combination therapy indicated that cell death occurred via apoptosis.

In conclusion, this study proposes that the CBD and PDT combination therapy is effective in killing MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro by induction of apoptosis.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38247877/

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/13/2/187

“Although carbon monoxide (CO)-based treatments have demonstrated the high cancer efficacy by promoting mitochondrial damage and core-region penetrating ability, the efficiency was often compromised by protective autophagy (mitophagy). Herein, cannabidiol (CBD) is integrated into biomimetic carbon monoxide nanocomplexes (HMPOC@M) to address this issue by inducing excessive autophagy. The biomimetic membrane not only prevents premature drugs leakage, but also prolongs blood circulation for tumor enrichment. After entering the acidic tumor microenvironment, carbon monoxide (CO) donors are stimulated by hydrogen oxide (H₂O₂) to disintegrate into CO and Mn²⁺. The comprehensive effect of CO/Mn²⁺ and CBD can induce ROS-mediated cell apoptosis. In addition, HMPOC@M-mediated excessive autophagy can promote cancer cell death by increasing autophagic flux via class III PI3K/BECN1 complex activation and blocking autolysosome degradation via LAMP1 downregulation. Furthermore, in vivo experiments showed that HMPOC@M+ laser strongly inhibited tumor growth and attenuated liver and lung metastases by downregulating VEGF and MMP9 proteins. This strategy may highlight the pro-death role of excessive autophagy in TNBC treatment, providing a novel yet versatile avenue to enhance the efficacy of CO treatments. Importantly, this work also indicated the applicability of CBD for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) therapy through excessive autophagy.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37969731/

“In our points, this comprehensive strategy will open a new door for efficient triple-negative breast cancer therapy through CBD-induced excessive autophagy.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211383523001648?via%3Dihub

“Cannabidiol (CBD) is a non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid that has been discussed for its safety and efficacy in cancer treatments. For this reason, we have inquired into its use on triple-negative human breast cancer. Analyzing the biological effects of CBD on MDA-MB-231, we have demonstrated that both CBD dosage and serum concentrations in the culture medium influence its outcomes; furthermore, light scattering studies demonstrated that serum impacts the CBD aggregation state by acting as a surfactant agent. Pharmacological studies on CBD in combination with chemotherapeutic agents reveal that CBD possesses a protective action against the cytotoxic effect exerted by cisplatin on MDA-MB-231 grown in standard conditions. Furthermore, in a low serum condition (0.5%), starting from a threshold concentration (5 µM), CBD forms aggregates, exerts cytostatic antiproliferative outcomes, and promotes cell cycle arrest activating autophagy. At doses above the threshold, CBD exerts a highly cytotoxic effect inducing bubbling cell death. Finally, IGF-1 and EGF antagonize the antiproliferative effect of CBD protecting cells from harmful consequences of CBD aggregates. In conclusion, CBD effect is strongly associated with the physical state and concentration that reaches the treated cells, parameters not taken into account in most of the research papers.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35806150/

“Among the various biological properties of phytocannabinoids, their ability to induce antiproliferative effects in different human cancer cells raises the scientific interest in their therapeutic potential in the field of oncology.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/13/7145

“Although cannabinoids have been used for centuries for diverse pathological conditions, recently, their clinical interest and application have emerged due to their diverse pharmacological properties. Indeed, it is well established that cannabinoids exert important actions on multiple sclerosis, epilepsy and pain relief.

Regarding cancer, cannabinoids were first introduced to manage chemotherapy-related side effects, though several studies demonstrated that they could modulate the proliferation and death of different cancer cells, as well as angiogenesis, making them attractive agents for cancer treatment.

In relation to breast cancer, it has been suggested that estrogen receptor-negative (ER^–) cells are more sensitive to cannabinoids than estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) cells. In fact, most of the studies regarding their effects on breast tumors have been conducted on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Nonetheless, the number of studies on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) and ER⁺ breast tumors has been rising in recent years. However, besides the optimistic results obtained thus far, there is still a long way to go to fully understand the role of these molecules. This review intends to help clarify the clinical potential of cannabinoids for each breast cancer subtype.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35011388/

“Cannabinoids have been used for centuries in several therapeutic applications. Regarding cancer, the use of cannabinoids has already been approved in several countries for the relief of chemotherapy-associated effects, but their clinical potential is greater than initially thought, and their clinical interest has been rising in recent years. Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that cannabinoids exert important antitumor properties in the main breast cancer subtypes, particularly in TNBC, where different phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids have shown interesting therapeutic actions.”

“Thus, it is strongly believed that Cannabis, being an important natural source of many cannabinoids, may be a potential therapeutic option for the treatment or modulation of different physiological processes and, even, pathological conditions, such as cancer.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/27/1/156

“Experimental evidence accumulated during the last decade supports that cannabinoids, the active components of Cannabis sativa and their derivatives, possess anticancer activity. Thus, these compounds exert anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, anti-migratory and anti-invasive actions in a wide spectrum of cancer cells in culture. Moreover, tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis are hampered by cannabinoids in xenograft-based and genetically-engineered mouse models of cancer. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the anti-tumor potential of cannabinoids in breast cancer, which suggests that cannabinoid-based medicines may be useful for the treatment of most breast tumor subtypes.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737212001399

“Purpose/objective(s): Cannabis use among patients with cancer is an area of great interest given its widespread acceptance despite the lack of supporting clinical data. The absence of data limits the understanding of potential clinical benefits of cannabis and the ability of providers to deliver evidence-based recommendations for patient care. We explored cannabis use patterns in patients with early-stage breast cancer in a large multicenter cohort in a state with legalized adult non-medical cannabis.

Materials/methods: Initial questions about cannabis use history and frequency were introduced in Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC) breast cancer patient surveys on 2/1/2020 for female patients receiving radiation after lumpectomy for non-metastatic breast cancer. Expanded questions were introduced on 6/28/2022 to assess mode of administration, active ingredient, and reason for use. Summary statistics were generated. A multivariable model using logistic regression identified patient characteristics associated with cannabis use.

Results: Among 3948 eligible patients, 2738 (69.35%) completed survey questions, and 2462/2738 (89.9%) completed the initial question on cannabis use. Among those, 364/2462 (14.8%) noted cannabis use in the last 30 days, 588 (23.9%) noted remote use (>30 days ago), 1462 (59.4%) reported never having used cannabis, 44 (1.8%) preferred not to answer cannabis use questions, and 4 (0.4%) did not provide use history. Younger age [age <50 vs 60-70, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.65, 3.79) p<0.001)], Hispanic ethnicity [OR 2.20 (95% CI 1.06, 4.56) p = 0.03], history of smoking [OR 2.56 (95% CI 1.88, 3.48) p<0.001], current smoking [OR 4.70 (95% CI 3.22, 6.86) p<0.001)], and prior chemotherapy [OR 1.40 (95% CI 1.00, 1.96) p = 0.05] predicted recent cannabis use in a multivariable model. Of the 364 patients endorsing cannabis use in the last 30 days, 89 (24.5%), 72 (19.8%), 29 (8.0%), 66 (18.1%), 30 (8.2%), and 78 (21.4%) reported using cannabis 1-2 days, 3-5 days, 6-9 days, 10-19 days, 20-29 days, and all 30 days, respectively. The most common modes of administration among 76 individuals who responded to the expanded questionnaire to date were oral (39.4%), smoking (30.3%), and topical (10.5%). The products used contained tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 26.3%), cannabidiol (CBD; 19.7%), balanced levels of THC and CBD (19.7%), or active ingredients that were unknown to the patient (34.2%). Patients frequently endorsed cannabis use for insomnia, anxiety, and pain.

Conclusion: Many patients with early-stage breast cancer are using cannabis. Younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, smoking, and chemotherapy history are predictors of cannabis use. Patients are often unaware of the active ingredients in the products that they use, suggesting an important role for patient education and a need to equip providers to advise patients in their care.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37786222/

https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(23)05292-6/fulltext