“Chronic pain presents as a complex condition encompassing sensory (Zhang Z et al. Cell Rep 12;752-759, 2015) and emotional components, often accompanied by anxiety, depression, insomnia, and cognitive impairment. These factors significantly hinder daily activities and rehabilitation efforts.
The widespread prevalence of chronic pain imposes substantial clinical, societal, and economic burdens. While current analgesics have limitations and associated side effects such as tolerance, dependency, cognitive deficits, and a narrow therapeutic window, the search for new analgesic options remains imperative.
The endocannabinoid system (ECS), a key modulator in pain processing pathways, plays a crucial role in executive functions. This review specifically focuses on the cognitive impairments associated with chronic pain and highlights the pivotal role of the ECS in the cognitive aspects of pain. Additionally, the effectiveness of cannabinoid-based medications in improving executive functions in patients with chronic pain is evaluated.”
“Mechanical allodynia, the pain caused by innocuous tactile stimuli, is a hallmark symptom of neuropathic pain that is often resistant to currently available treatments.
Cannabinoids are widely used for pain management; however, their therapeutic mechanisms for neuropathic mechanical allodynia remain unclear.
Using transgenic rats that enable to optogenetically stimulate touch-sensing Aβ fibers in the skin, we found that the intrathecal administration of the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2, alleviated the Aβ fiber-derived neuropathic allodynia. Furthermore, we injected adeno-associated virus vectors incorporating the rat cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1 receptor) (encoded by Cnr1) promoter and tdTomato or short hairpin RNA targeting the CB1 receptor into the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) and demonstrated that the conditional knockdown of CB1 receptors in Cnr1+ SDH neurons attenuates the anti-allodynic effects of intrathecally administered WIN 55,212-2. Electrophysiological analysis revealed that Cnr1+ SDH neurons received excitatory synaptic inputs from the primary afferent Aβ fibers.
Collectively, our results suggest that the CB1 receptors in Cnr1+ SDH neurons are molecular and cellular targets of intrathecal WIN 55,212-2 to alleviate neuropathic allodynia.”
“WIN 55,212-2 is a chemical described as an aminoalkylindole derivative, which produces effects similar to those of cannabinoids such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) “
“Many medical conditions are accompanied by severe pain. Acute pain refers to the experience of pain that lasts for only a few hours, whereas chronic pain is the ongoing emergence of pain signals over an extended period.
Since ancient times, cannabis has been utilized for medical purposes.
This article demonstrates the medicinal importance of cannabinoids through their analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities. Additionally, the mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced analgesia have been interpreted via preclinical investigations in animals. Cannabinoid extracts were formulated into gel and cream at concentrations of 2.5% and 5%.
The cannabis cream showed the highest analgesic activity at 5% compared to methyl salicylate as a control. Moreover, cannabis gel produced a comparable anti-inflammatory effect at 5% against the standard diclofenac sodium.
Molecular docking studies of all cannabinoids were performed to understand their modes of interaction and binding affinities with the cyclooxygenase II receptor. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulation studies were conducted for for both the ligand-free and cannabidiol-bound cyclooxygenase II to validate the in vivo and molecular docking results. During simulations, the stability of the protein was analyzed using root-mean-square deviation and root-mean-square fluctuation. The study of trajectories of the ligand-free and ligand-bound proteins was assessed using radius of gyration and solvent accessible surface area. Molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area was used to evaluate the free energies of ligand binding. Dynamic cross-correlation matrix, principal component analysis and free energy landscape characterized the conformational changes and relative energies of them, which shows the existence of two metastable conformations in cyclooxygenase II, one of which is possibly the native state with catalytic activity.
In conclusion, the data from this study support the use of medicinal cannabis in the management of pain. To mitigate the suffering of patients experiencing extreme pain, the rational use of cannabis-based drugs merits significant consideration.”
“Background: Our objective was to provide an overview of the currently available scientific and clinical data supporting the use of Cannabis and Cannabis-derived products for the treatment of chronic pain disorders. We also provide information for researchers, clinicians, and patients to be better informed and understand the approach behind the recommendation of Cannabis as a potential adjuvant in the treatment/control of chronic pain. Cannabis and its bioactive compounds have sparked interest in the field of pain treatment in spite of its controversial history and status as a controlled substance in many countries. With the increase in chronic pain, physicians and patients have started to look at alternative ways to treat pain aside from traditional treatments. One alternative is the use of cannabis to reduce/treat chronic pain disorders based on anecdotal accounts and the function of its phytocannabinoids. The two main cannabinoids in cannabis, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol, act on CB1 and CB2 receptors (in addition to several additional receptors). It is through these pleiotropic receptor interactions that these compounds elicit their biological function including the reduction of chronic pain. In this narrative review, we included the most recent evidence supporting the use of cannabis in the treatment of chronic pain disorders including chronic neuropathic pain, cancer-induced neuropathic pain, chronic musculoskeletal pain, and chronic headaches and migraines.
Summary: Evidence suggests that cannabis and cannabinoids have an analgesic effect that arises from a combination of compounds and various receptor systems. These effects may be maximized with the use of a combination of cannabinoids. At the same time, the combination of cannabinoids helps minimize the undesirable side effects of some cannabinoids such as the psychoactivity of THC. With these findings, further research is necessary to assess the analgesic properties of other cannabinoids like cannabichromene and cannabigerol and their contributions to the reduction of pain.”
“Cannabis sativa L. has been used as a medicinal remedy for thousands of years. It has gone through multiple periods of acceptance, dismissal/rejection, reacceptance, illegality and, most recently, rediscovery of its potential to address chronic medical conditions. In the last few decades, its recreational use has received growing acceptance, while its medical use has been encouraged in multiple jurisdictions. Most modern research has focused on the phytocannabinoids produced by the plant which have been found to help minimize chronic neuropathic pain and mitigate other disorders including seizure conditions (e.g., Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes) and spasticity in MS. This review has provided scientific evidence supporting the use of cannabis as an adjuvant in the treatment of chronic pain which could also lead pain reduction to the point of minimizing other pharmacological treatments.”
“Preclinical and epidemiological evidence supports that cannabinoids may have opioid-sparing properties and could be one strategy to decrease opioid use and associated harms like overdose and extramedical use.
The objective of this within subjects, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized human laboratory trial was to examine whether cannabidiol (CBD) increases opioid analgesic effects and whether there are corresponding increases in other opioid mediated effects.
Healthy participants (N = 31) attended 5 outpatient sessions where they received the following drug conditions: (1) placebo + placebo, (2) 4 mg hydromorphone + placebo, (3) 4 mg hydromorphone + 50 mg CBD, (4) 4 mg hydromorphone + 100 mg CBD, and (5) 4 mg hydromorphone + 200 mg CBD. Before and at multiple time points after drug administration, participants completed (1) quantitative sensory testing, which induced and assessed acute and chronic laboratory models of pain; (2) standard assessments, which queried acute subjective drug effects; and (3) tasks, which assessed psychomotor performance.
When combined with a dose of hydromorphone that did not reliably produce analgesic effects on its own, CBD increased the analgesic effects for some laboratory acute pain outcomes but none of the laboratory chronic pain outcomes. At the highest dose of CBD (200 mg), there were concurrent increases in self-report Bad Effects and adverse effects that were not observed at lower doses of CBD (50 mg). Cannabidiol mitigated psychomotor impairment observed with hydromorphone alone.
These findings suggest that lower doses of CBD (50 mg) may have utility for enhancing acute analgesic properties of opioids without having corresponding increases in bad effects.”
“Introduction: Amidst the opioid overdose crisis, there is interest in cannabis use for pain management and harm reduction. We investigated the relationship between cannabis use and cessation of unregulated opioid use among people who use drugs (PWUD) living with chronic pain.
Method: Data for analyses were collected from three prospective cohort studies in Vancouver, Canada. All cohort participants who completed at least two study visits and reported both pain and unregulated opioid use in the past 6 months were included in the present study. We analysed the association between cannabis use frequency and opioid cessation rates using extended Cox regression models with time-updated covariates.
Results: Between June 2014 and May 2022, 2340 PWUD were initially recruited and of those 1242 PWUD reported chronic pain, use of unregulated opioids and completed at least two follow-up visits. Of these 1242 participants, 764 experienced a cessation event over 1038.2 person-years resulting in a cessation rate of 28.5 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.4-31.9). Daily cannabis use was positively associated with opioid cessation (adjusted hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81; p = 0.011). In the sex-stratified sub-analyses, daily cannabis use was significantly associated with increased rates of opioid cessation among males (adjusted hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.08; p = 0.014).
Discussion and conclusions: Participants reporting daily cannabis use exhibited higher rates of cessation compared to less frequent users or non-users. Observed sex-specific differences in cannabis use and opioid cessation suggest potential differences in cannabis use behaviours and effects. Our findings add to the growing evidence supporting the potential benefits of cannabis use among PWUD, underlining the need for further research.”
“Pain is highly prevalent among emerging adults (18-25 years old), and rates of cannabis use are increasing among this population. Research indicates pain is a unique risk factor and motivator for substance use. However, evidence for pain-cannabis use relations among emerging adults is largely cross-sectional, and the only prospective evidence focuses on the frequency, quantity, and consequences of cannabis use, not initiation.
Accordingly, this is the first study to examine pain as a prospective predictor of cannabis initiation among emerging adults.
Data were drawn from five annual waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Emerging adults who denied cannabis use at baseline (n = 4,185) were included in the analysis. At baseline, a tenth of emerging adults reported moderate/severe pain (≥4/10). Adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that emerging adults with moderate/severe baseline pain were more likely to initiate cannabis use, and did so earlier over the subsequent 4 years, than those with no/low baseline pain.
These findings provide initial evidence for pain as a risk factor for cannabis initiation during emerging adulthood. Future research is needed to identify mechanisms by which pain motivates cannabis initiation and to examine the utility of pain-targeted content in cannabis use prevention and intervention efforts among emerging adults.”
“Overview: Cannabinoids have gained increasing attention for their therapeutic potential in treating several neurological conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, chronic pain, and epilepsy. This review aims to assess the current clinical trials investigating cannabinoids, primarily Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol, for neurological disorders. This review will aim to highlight the efficacy, safety, and outcome measures used in these trials.
Methods: Clinical trials were identified using ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on studies that examined the effects of cannabinoids in treating neurological conditions. All trials that fulfilled the following criteria were included: Phase 1-4, focused on cannabinoids as primary intervention, and measured relevant outcomes such as pain relief, cognitive function, or spasticity reduction. Data on conditions, interventions, primary and secondary outcomes, and trial phases were extracted and analysed.
Results: A total of 47 clinical trials were identified, including different neurological conditions. The most frequently studied conditions were Multiple Sclerosis, Fibromyalgia, and Parkinson’s Disease. Most trials were in Phase 2, with the primary outcome measures focused on pain management, spasticity, and cognitive function. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability measures.
Conclusion: The review highlights the broad therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in neurology, with promising results in symptom management for conditions like Multiple Sclerosis and Fibromyalgia. However, the lack of standardized study protocols, dosing, and outcome measures presents challenges for broader clinical implementation.”
“The results of this analysis showed that both CBD and THC have significant potential as therapeutic agents for neurological disorders, particularly in managing pain, motor dysfunction, and behavioural disturbances. However, their different pharmacological profiles and side effect risks mean that each cannabinoid may be better suited to different patient populations and conditions. While THC’s broader range of applications in cognitive and motor symptoms positions it as a more multipurpose treatment option, the psychoactive risks associated with its use should not be ignored. On the other hand, CBD’s safety and non-psychoactive nature make it more preferred option for managing chronic pain, but its therapeutic benefits may be more limited. Future research should focus on addressing the gaps in long-term safety and efficacy data, as well as exploring the full potential of lesser-known cannabinoids and combination therapies to further enhance the treatment of neurological disorders.”
“Objective: Cannabis is being used as a therapeutic option by patients around the globe, and older patients represent a rapidly growing subset of this population. This study aims to assess the patterns of medical cannabis use in patients over 50 years of age and its effect on health outcomes such as pain, sleep, quality of life, and co-medication.
Method: The Medical Cannabis in Older Patients Study (MCOPS) is a multi-site, prospective observational study examining the real-world impact of medical cannabis use on patients over age 50 under the guidance of a health care provider. The study included validated instruments, with treating physicians collecting detailed data on participant characteristics, medical cannabis and co-medication use, and associated impacts on pain, sleep, quality of life, as well as adverse events.
Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 299 participants. Average age of participants was 66.7 years, and 66.2% of respondents identified as female. Approximately 90% of patients used medical cannabis to treat pain-related conditions such as chronic pain and arthritis. Almost all patients reported a preference for oral cannabis products (e.g., extracts, edibles) rather than inhalation products (e.g., flower, vapes), and most preferred oral formulations high in cannabidiol and low in tetrahydrocannabinol.
Over the six-month study period, significant improvements were noted in pain, sleep, and quality of life measures, with 45% experiencing a clinically meaningful improvement in pain interference and in sleep quality scores. Additionally, nearly 50% of patients taking co-medications at baseline had reduced their use by the end of the study period, and quality of life improved significantly from baseline to M3 and from baseline to M6, with an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of $25,357.20. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported.
Conclusions: In this cohort of older patients, most of whom suffered from pain-related conditions, medical cannabis seemed to be a safe and effective treatment. Most patients experienced clinically significant improvements in pain, sleep, and quality of life and reductions in co-medication. The cost per QALY was well below the standard for traditional pharmaceuticals, and no SAEs were reported, suggesting that cannabis is a relatively safe and cost-effective therapeutic option for adults dealing with age-related health conditions.”
“Objective: Almost half of U.S. states have passed recreational cannabis laws as of May 2024. While considerable evidence to date indicates cannabis may be a substitute for prescription opioids in the treatment of pain, it remains unclear if patients are treating pain with cannabis alone or concomitantly with other medications.
Method: Using data from a national sample of commercially insured adults, we examine the effect of recreational cannabis legalization (through two sequential policies) on prescribing of opioids, NSAIDS, and other pain medications by implementing synthetic control estimations and constructing case-study level counterfactuals for the years 2007-2020.
Results: Overall, we find recreational cannabis legalization is associated with a decrease in opioid fills among commercially insured adults in the U.S., and we find evidence of a compositional change in prescriptions of pain medications more broadly. Specifically, we find marginally significant increases in prescribing of non-opioid pain medications after recreational cannabis becomes legal in some states. Once recreational cannabis dispensaries open, we find statistically significant decreases in the rate of opioid prescriptions (13% reduction from baseline, p < .05) and marginally significant decreases in the average daily supply of opioids (6.3% decrease, p < .10) and number of opioid prescriptions per patient (3.5% decrease, p < .10).
Conclusions: These results suggest that substitution of cannabis for traditional pain medications increases as the availability of recreational cannabis increases. There appears to be a small shift once recreational cannabis becomes legal, but we see stronger results once users can purchase cannabis at recreational dispensaries. The decrease in opioids and marginal increase in non-opioid pain medication may reflect patients substituting opioids with cannabis and non-opioid pain medications, either separately or concomitantly. Reductions in opioid prescription fills stemming from recreational cannabis legalization may prevent exposure to opioids in patients with pain and lead to decreases in the number of new opioid users, rates of opioid use disorder, and related harms.”
