“In the last two decades, the endocannabinoid system has emerged as a crucial modulator of motivation and emotional processing. Due to its widespread neuroanatomical distribution and characteristic retrograde signaling nature, cannabinoid type I receptors and their endogenous ligands finely orchestrate somatic and axon terminal activity of dopamine neurons.
Owing to these unique features, this signaling system is a promising pharmacological target to ameliorate dopamine-mediated drug-seeking behaviors while circumventing the adverse side effects of, for instance, dopaminergic antagonists.
Despite considerable preclinical efforts, an agreement on the efficacy of endocannabinoid-targeting compounds for treating drug substance use disorders in humans has not been reached. In the following chapter, we will summarize preclinical and clinical evidence addressing the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids and endocannabinoid-targeting compounds in substance use disorders.
To bridge the gap between animal and clinical research, we capitalize on studies evaluating the impact of endocannabinoid-targeting compounds in relevant settings, such as the management of drug relapse.
Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of novel cannabinoid compounds that hold promise for treating substance use disorders.”
“Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) has been extensively studied as a potential therapeutic target for various conditions, including pain management, obesity, emesis, and metabolic syndrome. Unlike orthosteric agonists such as Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) has been identified as a negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of CB1R, among its other pharmacological targets. Previous computational and structural studies have proposed various binding sites for CB1R NAMs. An X-ray crystal structure revealed a binding site for the NAM, ORG27569, at an extrahelical location within the inner leaflet of the membrane. In contrast, multiple computational studies have previously proposed several potential allosteric binding sites for CBD within the CB1R structure. Given that a prior structural study suggested CBD might occupy the same site as ORG27569, we conducted a comprehensive investigation of potential CBD binding sites using molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, metadynamics (MTD) simulations, binding free-energy calculations, and in vitro mutagenesis experiments. Molecular docking, MD, and MTD simulations results, along with binding free-energy calculations, suggest that CBD may potentially bind to either the same extrahelical site as ORG27569 or a previously unidentified intracellular site located near TMHs 2, 6, and 7 and helix 8. This intracellular site is consistent with allosteric binding sites observed in other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To establish the most favorable allosteric site for CBD, we conducted site-directed mutagenesis of key residues at each site. Mutations at S4018.47ΔA and D4038.49ΔA augmented the binding of [3H]-SR141716A, suggesting these residues play critical roles in CBD binding. As a result, the combined computational and mutagenesis results identified a binding site for CBD between TMHs 2, 6, and 7 and helix 8, involving residues Y1532.40, I1562.43, M3376.29, L3416.33, S4018.47, and D4038.49. These findings provide valuable insights into how CBD binds to CB1R, thereby informing the rational design of new, selective, and potent NAMs. Moreover, the elucidation of this previously unexplored allosteric site might explain the polypharmacology of CBD due to structural conservation among Class A GPCRs.”
“An impact of legalization and decriminalization of marijuana is the gradual increase in the use of cannabis for recreational purposes, which poses a potential threat to society and healthcare systems worldwide. However, the discovery of receptor subtypes, endogenous endocannabinoids, and enzymes involved in synthesis and degradation, as well as pharmacological characterization of receptors, has led to exploration of the use of cannabis in multiple peripheral and central pathological conditions.
The role of cannabis in the modulation of crucial events involving perturbed physiological functions and disease progression, including apoptosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, perturbed mitochondrial function, and the impaired immune system, indicates medicinal values.
These events are involved in most neurological diseases and prompt the gradual progression of the disease. At present, several synthetic agonists and antagonists, in addition to more than 70 phytocannabinoids, are available with distinct efficacy as a therapeutic alternative in different pathological conditions. The present review aims to describe the use of cannabis in neurological diseases and psychiatric disorders.”
“Cannabis sativa L. (marijuana), an ancient plant with medicinal values, has been used for medicinal, recreational, and spiritual purposes for a long time worldwide.”
“The discovery of the ECS has sparked the interest of many researchers worldwide due to its potential therapeutic contribution to some of the incurable neurodegenerative diseases such as AD, PD, HD, and psychological abnormalities. To date, studies have uncovered the expression, location, structures, and mechanism of cannabinoid receptors.
When the endocannabinoid system’s associations with other biochemical pathways are fully elucidated, many medical and political changes will be seen, such as the legalization of marijuana and new therapeutic approaches to neurodegenerative diseases.
Recent developments regarding crystal structure and cryoEM open the door to understanding the structural complexity and future therapeutic implication of cannabinoids in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Most genes associated with neurological diseases have been defined; however, the molecular details of other changes are largely elusive and are of immense interest to be explored. At this stage, it will be interesting to elucidate the role of CB2R as a neuroprotective strategy in addition to other proteins that are modulated following cannabis administration.
Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and disrupted cell organelles, specifically mitochondria, are intimately associated with compelling causative factors for disease progression and are potential therapeutic avenues to explore in neurodegeneration, along with psychological disturbances; therefore, they should be the prime objective for future studies on cannabinoids to develop novel therapeutic chimeric molecules with minimum side effects and maximum benefits.”
“Historically, the multiple uses of cannabis as a medicine, food, and for recreational purposes as a psychoactive drug span several centuries.
The various components of the plant (i.e., seeds, roots, leaves and flowers) have been utilized to alleviate symptoms of inflammation and pain (e.g., osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis), mood disorders such as anxiety, and intestinal problems such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea.
It has been established that the intestinal microbiota progresses neurological, endocrine, and immunological network effects through the gut-microbiota-brain axis, serving as a bilateral communication pathway between the central and enteric nervous systems.
An expanding body of clinical evidence emphasizes that the endocannabinoid system has a fundamental connection in regulating immune responses. This is exemplified by its pivotal role in intestinal metabolic and immunity equilibrium and intestinal barrier integrity.
This neuromodulator system responds to internal and external environmental signals while also serving as a homeostatic effector system, participating in a reciprocal association with the intestinal microbiota.
We advance an exogenous cannabinoid-intestinal microbiota-endocannabinoid system axis potentiated by the intestinal microbiome and medicinal cannabinoids supporting the mechanism of action of the endocannabinoid system. An integrative medicine model of patient care is advanced that may provide patients with beneficial health outcomes when prescribed medicinal cannabis.”
“Furthermore, other modes of delivery of medicinal cannabis, such as oro-buccal, sublingual and inhaled/smoked alternatives, provide cannabinoids that have rapid access to the systemic circulation, bypassing the intestinal tract.”
“Despite using the recommended anti-emetic treatments, control of nausea and vomiting is still an unmet need for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Few properly controlled clinical trials have evaluated the potential of exogenously administered cannabinoids or manipulations of the endogenous cannabinoid (eCB) system to treat nausea and vomiting. In this chapter, we explore the pre-clinical and human clinical trial evidence for the potential of exogenous cannabinoids and manipulations of the eCB system to reduce nausea and vomiting. Although there are limited high-quality human clinical trials, pre-clinical evidence suggests that cannabinoids and manipulations of the eCB system have anti-nausea/anti-emetic potential. The pre-clinical anti-nausea/anti-emetic evidence highlights the need for further evaluation of cannabinoids and manipulations of eCBs and other fatty acid amides in clinical trials.”
“This study explores the trajectory of interest in and use of Extractum Cannabis (hemp extract, i.e., extract of Cannabis sativa L.) for the symptomatic treatment of minor gastrointestinal distress and dyspepsia in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) prior to 1939, through a review of primary sources.
The objective of this paper is to present a historical pharmaceutical and applied review of the medical use of the hemp genus (Cannabis L.) prior to its prohibition, thereby contributing to its recognition as a medicinal product.
The information provided demonstrates evidence of the medicinal use of cannabis within the historical context studied. The interactions between this legacy medical use and the contemporary body of pharmacological and toxicological knowledge (on hemp, its constituents, and the endocannabinoid system in gastrointestinal and stomach disorders) are discussed, providing new possible clinical perspectives.
Within its limitations-including the scope, limited accessibility to, and varying quality of archives-this research contributes to a more granular understanding of the historical embeddedness of psychoactive hemp medicines in northeastern Spain, suggesting that medical and pharmaceutical traditions could play a role in informing contemporary approaches to “medical marijuana”.”
“Background/aim: No specific pharmacological treatment regimen for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) exists. Therefore, new antiinflammatory therapeutic strategies are needed. Cannabinoids (CBs), known for their inflammation-modulating and antifibrotic effects, may be potential medication candidates for treating IPF. We aim to evaluate the inflammation-modulating and antifibrotic effects of CB receptor (CBR) agonists and antagonists in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated normal human lung fibroblast, epithelial cells, IPF fibroblast cells, and monocytes.
Materials and methods: We detected CBRs in normal human lung fibroblasts (LL24) and IPF fibroblast cells (LL29), epithelial cells (A549) and monocytes (THP-1) by flow cytometry. We determined TGF-β1, IL-8, and TNF-α inflammatory cytokines in the LL24, LL29, A549, and THP-1 cell culture supernatants on days 1 and 5 by ELISA. We evaluated the cell viability in LL24, LL29, and A549 cells on days 1, 3, and 5 spectrophotometrically and detected collagen Type I (ColI) production in the LL24 and LL29 cell culture supernatants on days 1, 3, and 5 by ELISA.
Results: LL24, LL29, A549, and THP-1 cells exhibited CB1 (CB1R) and CB2 (CB2R) receptors. CB1R and CB2R agonists WIN55,212-2 and JWH015 inhibited fibroblastic and epithelial cell proliferation on day 5. TGF-β1 and TNF-α release increased, while IL-8 release decreased in LL24, LL29, A549, and THP-1 cells in response to the administration of WIN55,212-2 and JWH015 at a 10-2 mM concentration. CB1R and CB2R antagonists AM251 and AM630 did not block agonistic responses, suggesting a nonclassical CBR-mediated pathway. CB2R agonist JWH015 decreased ColI expression in IPF lung fibroblasts LL29 on day 3.
Conclusion: These results suggest that CB signaling regulates the progression of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis via CBR activation. This may offer a potential pharmacological tool for developing antifibrosis therapies.”
“Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a frequent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that causes long-lasting inflammation in the innermost lining of the rectum and colon.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of Cannabis sativa (C. sativa) on the amelioration of acetic acid-induced colitis in rats.
Materials and methods: Group 1: normal control group was intrarectally administered saline solution (0.9%); group 2: acetic acid (AA) group was given AA intra-rectally (2 mL of 4% (v/v) in 0.9% NaCl) once.; group 3&4: This group represented the ulcerative colitis-induced rats that were injected with acetic acid intra-rectally, then s.c. injection with C. sativa (20 and 40 mg/kg daily for 8 days).
Results: Colonic architectural abnormality significantly improved after pretreatment with C. sativa. Additionally, it significantly reduced the MDA level and prevented the depletion of GSH content. Moreover, C. sativa administration showed suppressive activities on pro-inflammatory cytokines, including NF-κB, MAPK, ERK, PI3K, AKT, HIF-1α, and TLR4. Moreover, it significantly upregulated the level of SIRT and CB1 in the colon tissue.
Conclusion: This study provided a novel impact for CB1 receptor activation produced by C. sativa against AA-induced UC in rats through inhibiting the TLR-4 MAPK/ERK, PI3K, and NFκB signaling pathways.”
“Patients with high-grade serous carcinoma of tubo-ovarian origin (HGSC) often experience significant side effects related to their disease and treatments, such as pain, discomfort, nausea, and vomiting.
Over the last two decades, the use of cannabinoids (CBD) to manage pain and anxiety has become more mainstream. However, there is limited data on how CBD interacts with HGSC tumor cells or whether CBD impacts the effect of chemotherapy.
Prior preclinical data has suggested the antitumor benefits of cannabinoids; however, the mechanism and data in ovarian cancer are limited.
The objectives of this proposed research are to define the endocannabinoid system milieu in ovarian cancer, determine if CBD influences the growth of ovarian cancer cells, measure the cell viability when cannabinoids such as CBD are combined with standard-of-care therapies, and identify potential molecular pathways in which cannabinoids have a therapeutic effect.
We conducted publicly available database searches, in vitro proliferation and apoptotic assays, functional protein signaling via reverse phase protein array analysis of CBD-treated cells using 2D cultured cells, and immunohistological analysis of ex vivo cultured patient-derived tumor slices treated with CBD.
Our data suggests that CBD is unlikely to affect the growth of cancer cells at physiologic doses but promotes apoptosis and can have growth inhibitory effects at higher concentrations.
The inhibitory effects seen at high dose concentrations are likely from the upregulation of apoptotic pathways and inhibition of oncogenic pathways. Overall, physiologic CBD levels have minimal impact on cancer cell growth or chemotherapy efficacy.”
“Cannabis sativa L. contains numerous compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, including the flavonoids and the cannabinoids, particularly Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD).
Cannabinoids have an effect on the endocannabinoid system (ECS), a cellular communication network, and are, hence, widely studied for medical applications.
Epidiolex®, a 99% pure oral CBD extract, has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of epilepsy. Nabiximols (Sativex) is an oromucosal spray containing equal volume of THC and CBD, and it is commonly used as an add-on treatment for unresponsive spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
Several in vitro and in vivo studies have also shown that cannabinoids can be used to treat various types of cancer, such as melanoma and brain glioblastoma; the first positive clinical trials on the anticancer effect of a THC:CBD blend with temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of highly invasive brain cancer are very promising.
The cannabinoids exert their anticancer properties in in vitro investigations by the induction of cell death, mainly by apoptosis and cytotoxic autophagy, and the inhibition of cell proliferation. In several studies, cannabinoids have been found to induce tumor regression and inhibit angiogenic mechanisms in vitro and in vivo, as well as in two low-numbered epidemiological studies.
They also exhibit antiviral effects by inhibiting ACE2 transcription, blocking viral replication and fusion, and acting as anti-inflammatory agents; indeed, prior CBD consumption (a study of 93,565 persons in Chicago) has also been associated with a much lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
It is postulated that cannabis extracts can be used in the treatment of many other diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, or various types of neurological disorders, e.g., Alzheimer’s disease.
The aim of this review is to outline the current state of knowledge regarding currently used medicinal preparations derived from C. sativa L. in the treatment of selected cancer and viral diseases, and to present the latest research on the potential applications of its secondary metabolites.”
“C. sativa L. is an extraordinary plant that provides a valuable raw material for medical applications. Its secondary metabolites, cannabinoids, have attracted growing interest in the fight against illness, mainly due to their effect on CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors.”
