“Cannabidiol has been reported to interact with broad-spectrum biological targets with pleiotropic pharmacology including epilepsy although a cohesive mechanism is yet to be determined. Even though some studies propose that cannabidiol may manipulate glutamatergic signals, there is insufficient evidence to support cannabidiol direct effect on glutamate signaling, which is important in intervening epilepsy. Therefore, the present study aimed to analyze the epilepsy-related targets for cannabidiol, assess the differentially expressed genes with its treatment, and identify the possible glutamatergic signaling target.

In this study, the epileptic protein targets of cannabidiol were identified using the Tanimoto coefficient and similarity index-based targets fishing which were later overlapped with the altered expression, epileptic biomarkers, and genetically altered proteins in epilepsy. The common proteins were then screened for possible glutamatergic signaling targets with differentially expressed genes. Later, molecular docking and simulation were performed using AutoDock Vina and GROMACS to evaluate binding affinity, ligand-protein stability, hydrophilic interaction, protein compactness, etc. Cannabidiol identified 30 different epilepsy-related targets of multiple protein classes including G-protein coupled receptors, enzymes, ion channels, etc. Glutamate receptor 2 was identified to be genetically varied in epilepsy which was targeted by cannabidiol and its expression was increased with its treatment. More importantly, cannabidiol showed a direct binding affinity with Glutamate receptor 2 forming a stable hydrophilic interaction and comparatively lower root mean squared deviation and residual fluctuations, increasing protein compactness with broad conformational changes.

Based on the cheminformatic target fishing, evaluation of differentially expressed genes, molecular docking, and simulations, it can be hypothesized that cannabidiol may possess glutamate receptor 2-mediated anti-epileptic activities.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39047503/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010482524009831?via%3Dihub

“Cannabidiol (CBD) has been investigated as a pharmacological approach for treating a myriad of neurological and psychiatric disorders, the most successful of them being its use as an antiseizure drug (ASD). Indeed, CBD has reached the clinics for the treatment of certain epileptic syndromes.

This chapter aims to overview the pharmacology of CBD and its potential mechanisms of action as an ASD. First, we give an outline of the concepts, mechanisms and pharmacology pertaining to the field of study of epilepsy and epileptic seizures. In the second section, we will summarize the effects of CBD as an ASD. Next, we will discuss its potential mechanisms of action to alleviate epileptic seizures, which seem to entail multiple neurotransmitters, receptors and intracellular pathways. Finally, we will conclude and present some limitations and perspectives for future studies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39029983/

“Five decades ago, early studies noted the potential effects of CBD in alleviating epileptic seizures. However, a prolonged period passed before scientific and social interest in this phytocannabinoid experienced a resurgence. This delay in exploration hindered a comprehensive understanding of its clinical profile, but mechanisms of action could finally be addressed. After a long journey starting from the bench, today CBD has become an additional therapeutic option for patients diagnosed with epilepsy”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0074774224000527?via%3Dihub

“Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of various doses of oral cannabidiol (CBD) in treating refractory epilepsy indications, thus providing more informative evidence for clinical decision-making.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science (WoS) was performed to retrieve relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different doses of oral CBD with placebo or each other in refractory epilepsy indications. The search was limited from the inception of each database to January 3, 2023. Relative risk [RR] with a 95% confidence interval [CI] was used to express results. STATA/SE 14 was employed for network meta-analysis.

Results: Six RCTs involving 972 patients were included in the final data analysis. Network meta-analysis showed that, CBD10 (10 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.28 to 2.44), CBD20 (20 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.91, 95%CI: 1.49 to 2.46), CBD25 (25 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.61, 95%CI: 0.96 to 2.70), and CBD50 (50 mg/kg/day) (RR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.07 to 2.94) were associated with higher antiseizure efficacy although the pooled result for CBD25 was only close to significant. In addition, in terms of the risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the difference between different doses is not significant. However, CBD20 ranked first in terms of antiseizure efficacy, followed by CBD50, CBD10, and CBD25. For TEAEs, CBD25 ranked first, followed by CBD10, CBD50, CBD5, and CBD20.

Conclusion: For refractory indications, CBD20 may be optimal option for antiseizure efficacy; however, CBD25 may be best for TEAEs. Therefore, an appropriate dose of oral CBD should be selected based on the actual situation. Due to the limitations of eligible studies and the limited sample size, more studies are needed in the future to validate our findings.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38994494/

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1243597/full