Category Archives: Chronic Pain

Oral cannabinoid formulation elevates sensory nerve conduction velocity and mitigates oxidative stress to alleviate neuropathic pain in rats

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background and aim: Use of potent painkillers like opiates are limited by their abuse potential and adverse physiological effects necessitating new therapeutics for pain management. This study assessed the efficacy of oral cannabinoid formulations (F1-F4) in alleviating chronic neuropathic pain (CP) and investigated their mechanisms through thermal algesia, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV).

Experimental procedures: A 21-day rat model of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was used to evaluate the effects of oral cannabinoid formulations (F1: 500 mg, F2: 1000 mg, F3: 2000 mg, F4: 3000 mg) in MCT oil, with pregabalin as the reference. Male Wistar rats (35) were divided equally into seven groups, with all except the Sham group undergoing sciatic nerve ligation and receiving different formulations.On day 22, behavioral (hot plate, tail flick) and electrophysiological (sensory nerve conduction velocity, SNCV) assessments were performed. SNCV was also measured in the presence of CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists. Additionally, blood-based markers of inflammation (TNF-α) and oxidative stress (MDA, GSH and CAT) were analysed.

Results and conclusions: The vehicle group exhibited significant hyperalgesia (p <0.005), reduced sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) (p <0.005) and elevated MDA and TNF-α levels, along with decreased GSH and CAT levels in both serum and sciatic nerve tissue.Among the formulations, F2 significantly improved pain latency and SNCV (p <0.005) compared to the vehicle group and outperformed F1, F3, F4 and pregabalin (p <0.05). Its effects were mediated through CB1 and CB2 receptor agonism while simultaneously reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, highlighting its potential as a promising candidate for neuropathic pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40336142/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01616412.2025.2500112

Cannabinoids: Therapeutic Perspectives for Management of Orofacial Pain, Oral Inflammation and Bone Healing-A Systematic Review

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Cannabinoids, particularly cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have been increasingly studied for their therapeutic applications in various medical fields. This systematic review aims to explore their role in oral surgery, focusing on pain management, inflammation control, and bone regeneration.

A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA framework to identify relevant studies from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases published up to November 2024. The review included clinical and preclinical studies investigating the effects of cannabinoids on orofacial pain, oral inflammation, and bone healing. Data on study design, cannabinoid types, and relevant outcomes were extracted and analyzed. CBD was the most commonly studied compound, with other studies evaluating CB1/CB2 receptor agonists, THC, and cannabis smoke.

Clinical trials showed mixed results: some studies found CBD effective in reducing dental or myofascial pain, while others found limited or non-superior outcomes compared to standard treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, corticosteroids). Among the four RCTs, three had a low risk of bias, and one moderate; all nine animal studies had a high risk of bias.

In conclusion, preclinical and clinical studies suggest that cannabinoids represent a promising non-opioid alternative for pain management and for oral inflammation.

Although some evidence suggests potential benefits of cannabinoids, particularly CBD, in oral health contexts, findings are derived from heterogeneous studies-many with high risk of bias. More high-quality, standardized clinical trials are necessary before recommending cannabinoids for routine dental practice.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40332414/

“Within the limitations of this review, cannabinoids—especially cannabidiol (CBD)—demonstrated potential in managing orofacial pain, reducing inflammation, and promoting bone healing.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/8/3766

Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis Versus Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background: Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) affects one in five adults and is commonly managed with long-term opioid therapy. Concerns regarding rare but catastrophic harms associated with opioids, including overdose and death, have generated interest in alternatives including cannabis; however, the comparative cost-effectiveness of these management options is uncertain. 

Methods: We used findings from a network meta-analysis of 90 randomized trials to develop a 1-year microsimulation model to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) between oral medical cannabis and opioids for CNCP. We used a publicly funded health care payer perspective for our analyses and obtained cost and utility data from publicly available sources. All costs are reported in 2023 Canadian dollars. All analyses were probabilistic, and we conducted sensitivity and scenario analyses to assess robustness. 

Results: Total mean annual cost per patient was $1,980 for oral medical cannabis and $1,851 for opioids, a difference of $129 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -$723 to $525). Mean QALYs were 0.582 for both oral medical cannabis and opioids (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.015). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that oral medical cannabis was cost-effective in 31% of iterations at willingness-to-pay thresholds up to $50,000/QALY gained.

Use of opioids is associated with nonfatal and fatal overdose, whereas medical cannabis is not. 

Discussion: Our findings suggest that medical cannabis as an alternative to opioids for chronic pain may confer similar, but modest, benefits to patients, and reduce the risk of opioid overdose without substantially increasing costs.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40304409/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2024.0120

Cannabinoids in neuropathic pain treatment: pharmacological insights and clinical outcomes from recent trials

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Neuropathic pain, a complex and often devastating condition, poses significant challenges for its effective management. Despite promising research on various cannabis formulations and delivery methods for neuropathic pain, significant gaps remain in our knowledge.

While inhaled cannabis shows analgesic effects and alternative delivery methods may improve bioavailability, oral formulations have yielded mixed results, often limited by small sample sizes and placebo effects. Therefore, further research is essential to optimize cannabis formulations, identify responder profiles to tailor treatments effectively, and, most critically, confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of cannabis-based therapies in managing NP.

This review article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the therapeutic potential of cannabis-based medicines, with a particular focus on cannabinoids. This review, though not systematic, examines 11 clinical studies, specifically Randomised Clinical Trials) published from 2014 to 2024, highlighting the efficacy of numerous cannabis formulations, in alleviating neuropathic pain.

Key findings show that cannabinoids can reduce pain perception, improve patient quality of life, and mitigate other symptoms associated with neuropathic pain.

The synergistic effects of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol are discussed, emphasizing their ability to enhance analgesic effects, while potentially reducing the psychoactive side effects of tetrahydrocannabinol.

This review emphasizes the importance of the personalized approach to improve therapeutic outcomes. Limitations of the existing research focusing on cannabis for neuropathic pain are limited by heterogeneity, lack of standardization, small sample sizes, and reliance on subjective outcomes, impacting the reliability and generalizability of findings. However, this exhaustive review aims to inform clinicians and researchers about the evolving role of cannabis in contemporary pain management strategies, illustrating the diverse pharmacological profiles of cannabinoids and their potential as adjunct therapies for neuropathic pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40261351/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00210-025-04134-7

Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management: A Review of the History, Efficacy, Applications, and Risks

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Background/Objectives: Chronic pain remains a pervasive and challenging public health issue, often resistant to conventional treatments such as opioids, which carry substantial risks of dependency and adverse effects. Cannabinoids, bioactive compounds derived from the Cannabis sativa plant and their synthetic analogs, have emerged as a potential alternative for pain management, leveraging their interaction with the endocannabinoid system to modulate pain and inflammation. 

Methods: The current, evolving literature regarding the history, efficacy, applications, and safety of cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain was reviewed and summarized to provide the most current review of cannabinoids. 

Results: Evidence suggests that cannabinoids provide moderate efficacy in managing neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, cancer-related pain, and multiple sclerosis-related spasticity. Patient-reported outcomes further indicate widespread perceptions of cannabinoids as a safer alternative to opioids, with potential opioid-sparing effects. However, the quality of existing evidence is limited by small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Regulatory barriers, including the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I substance in the United States, continue to hinder robust research and clinical integration. Moreover, the risks associated with cannabinoids, such as psychiatric effects, addiction potential, and drug interactions, necessitate cautious application. 

Conclusions: Cannabinoids represent a promising, albeit complex, alternative for chronic pain management, particularly given the limitations and risks of traditional therapies such as opioids. However, significant deficiencies remain in the research. While smaller trials and systematic reviews indicate therapeutic potential, the quality of evidence is often low due to limited sample sizes, short study durations, and methodological inconsistencies. Large-scale, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are urgently needed to confirm efficacy and safety across diverse patient populations and pain etiologies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40149508/

“The future for cannabis research is bright, and as regulatory frameworks adapt to balance access and oversight, cannabinoids may transition from an experimental adjunct to a well-established option in chronic pain care, provided scientific rigor and evidence-based policymaking remain at the forefront.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/530

Terpene blends from Cannabis sativa are cannabimimetic and antinociceptive in a mouse chronic neuropathic pain model via activation of adenosine A2a receptors

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“An increase in the use of medicinal Cannabis for pain management has spurred research into the understudied bioactive compounds in Cannabis, such as terpenes.

In our previous work, we showed that isolated and purified terpenes were cannabimimetic and also relieved chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) pain via activation of Adenosine A2a Receptors (A2aR) in the spinal cord. However, terpenes are most often consumed by the public as complex extracts and mixtures, not purified individual terpenes, and whether this cannabimimetic and antinociceptive activity holds true in terpene extracts and blends is not clear.

In this study, we thus extracted terpene blends from three distinct Cannabis chemovars and assessed these blends in male and female CD-1 mice for their cannabimimetic activity in the tetrad assay and pain-relieving properties in a CIPN model.

Each terpene blend was unique in the relative amounts of different terpenes extracted. Though each blend was unique, each similarly elicited cannabimimetic behaviors of catalepsy, hyperlocomotion, and hypothermia, without tail flick analgesia.

All three terpene blends effectively relieved CIPN, though the antinociception was more robust in male than in female mice. This antinociception was recapitulated by purified Myrcene but not D-Limonene. The A2aR antagonist istradefylline blocked the pain-relieving effects of all three terpene blends, suggesting that the terpene blends act on A2aR to relieve CIPN pain.

Together, these findings suggest that terpene blends have similar pharmacological effects as purified single terpenes, and that observations made with single terpenes may be applicable to the complex terpene mixtures commonly consumed by the public.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40122228/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030439402500093X?via%3Dihub

Cannabidiol reduces neuropathic pain and cognitive impairments through activation of spinal PPARγ

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“The purpose of this study was to evaluate the participation of spinal peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) in the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol, the expression of PPARγ in sites relevant to the spinal nociceptive processing, and the effect of this cannabinoid on cognitive deficits induced by neuropathic pain in female mice.

Either acute or repeated treatment with cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia and spontaneous pain (flinching) in female neuropathic mice. Pioglitazone partially reduced tactile allodynia, and this effect was fully blocked by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. Likewise, intrathecal injection of cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia, while PPARγ antagonist GW9662 or 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635, but not the PPARα antagonist GW6479, partially prevented this effect. GW9662 and WAY-100635 administrated per se did not modify tactile allodynia in neuropathic female mice. Co-administration of GW9662 and WAY-100635 fully prevented the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol in mice. Nerve injury up-regulated PPARγ expression at the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia, while cannabidiol further enhanced nerve injury-induced up-regulation of PPARγ expression in both tissues.

Repeated intrathecal injection of cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia and several pain makers (ERK, p-ERK, p38MAPK and p-p38MAPK). In addition, this treatment restored nerve injury-induced interleukin-10 down-regulation and increased PPARγ expression at the spinal cord. Repeated treatment with cannabidiol also improved nerve injury-induced cognitive impairment in mice.

These results provide compelling evidence for the involvement of PPARγ in the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol in mice and highlight its multifaceted therapeutic potential in neuropathic pain management and its comorbidities.

PERSPECTIVE: The present study reveals cannabidiol’s dual effects in female mice by reducing neuropathic pain through spinal PPARγ and 5-HT1A receptor activation and ameliorating nerve injury-induced cognitive impairment. These findings may assist clinicians seeking new therapeutic approaches for managing neuropathic pain and its associated cognitive deficits.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40112940/

https://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(25)00605-4/abstract

UK Medical Cannabis Registry: An Analysis of Outcomes of Medical Cannabis Therapy for Hypermobility-Associated Chronic Pain

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Objective: The study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) with chronic pain following treatment with cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs).

Methods: This was a case series conducted with the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. The primary outcomes were changes in the following validated patient-reported outcome measures at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months compared with baseline: Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2), pain visual analog scale score (Pain-VAS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS), General Anxiety Disorder Seven-Item Scale (GAD-7), and Patient Global Impression of Change. The incidence of adverse events was analyzed as secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was defined as P <0.050.

Results: A total of 161 patients met inclusion criteria. Improvements were observed in BPI severity and interference subscales, SF-MPQ-2, and Pain-VAS (P < 0.001). Changes were also seen in the EQ-5D-5L index value, SQS, and GAD-7 (P < 0.001). A total of 50 patients (31.06%) reported one or more adverse event with a total incidence of 601 (373.29%). The most frequent rating for adverse events was moderate (n = 258; 160.25%), with headache being the most common (n = 44; 27.33%).

Conclusion: An association was identified between patients with HSD/hEDS with chronic pain and improvements in pain-specific and general health-related quality of life following the commencement of CBMPs. CBMPs were also well tolerated at 18 months. These findings must be interpreted within the context of the limitations of study design but add further weight to calls for randomized controlled trials.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40079426/

“Cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) have emerged as a potential alternative for chronic pain management, acting on the endocannabinoid system (ECS), which plays a pivotal role in pain regulation.”

“This study reports an association between CBMP treatment and reported improvements in pain and HRQoL among patients with HSD/hEDS.”

https://acrjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr2.70024

Improvement in the Cognitive Function in Chronic Pain: Therapeutic Potential of the Endocannabinoid System

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Chronic pain presents as a complex condition encompassing sensory (Zhang Z et al. Cell Rep 12;752-759, 2015) and emotional components, often accompanied by anxiety, depression, insomnia, and cognitive impairment. These factors significantly hinder daily activities and rehabilitation efforts.

The widespread prevalence of chronic pain imposes substantial clinical, societal, and economic burdens. While current analgesics have limitations and associated side effects such as tolerance, dependency, cognitive deficits, and a narrow therapeutic window, the search for new analgesic options remains imperative.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS), a key modulator in pain processing pathways, plays a crucial role in executive functions. This review specifically focuses on the cognitive impairments associated with chronic pain and highlights the pivotal role of the ECS in the cognitive aspects of pain. Additionally, the effectiveness of cannabinoid-based medications in improving executive functions in patients with chronic pain is evaluated.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40059255/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12035-025-04814-8

Evaluation of cannabis-derived anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment in animals and identification of cannabinoid-based effective inhibition of prostaglandin through computational studies

Posted on by
Reply
pubmed logo

“Many medical conditions are accompanied by severe pain. Acute pain refers to the experience of pain that lasts for only a few hours, whereas chronic pain is the ongoing emergence of pain signals over an extended period.

Since ancient times, cannabis has been utilized for medical purposes.

This article demonstrates the medicinal importance of cannabinoids through their analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities. Additionally, the mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced analgesia have been interpreted via preclinical investigations in animals. Cannabinoid extracts were formulated into gel and cream at concentrations of 2.5% and 5%.

The cannabis cream showed the highest analgesic activity at 5% compared to methyl salicylate as a control. Moreover, cannabis gel produced a comparable anti-inflammatory effect at 5% against the standard diclofenac sodium.

Molecular docking studies of all cannabinoids were performed to understand their modes of interaction and binding affinities with the cyclooxygenase II receptor. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulation studies were conducted for for both the ligand-free and cannabidiol-bound cyclooxygenase II to validate the in vivo and molecular docking results. During simulations, the stability of the protein was analyzed using root-mean-square deviation and root-mean-square fluctuation. The study of trajectories of the ligand-free and ligand-bound proteins was assessed using radius of gyration and solvent accessible surface area. Molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area was used to evaluate the free energies of ligand binding. Dynamic cross-correlation matrix, principal component analysis and free energy landscape characterized the conformational changes and relative energies of them, which shows the existence of two metastable conformations in cyclooxygenase II, one of which is possibly the native state with catalytic activity.

In conclusion, the data from this study support the use of medicinal cannabis in the management of pain. To mitigate the suffering of patients experiencing extreme pain, the rational use of cannabis-based drugs merits significant consideration.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40048308/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07391102.2025.2472180