Combination of Cannabidiol and Low-Dose Buprenorphine Suggests Synergistic Analgesia and Attenuates Buprenorphine-Induced Respiratory Depression

pubmed logo

“Introduction: As opioid-related drug overdoses remain a public health crisis, there is a critical need for innovative approaches to developing safer analgesics with improved safety profiles. BDH-001 is a fixed-dose combination of low-dose buprenorphine (BUP) and cannabidiol (CBD) being developed as a safer analgesic than currently available opioids. The purpose of this study was to examine the analgesic and opioid-sparing effects of BDH-001 and to complete an in vivo safety assessment in rats. 

Methods: Analgesic effect of BDH-001 was assessed using the chronic constriction injury model of chronic neuropathic pain with pain threshold assessed via Von Frey testing. Drug-drug interaction effects on pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were assessed in a single dose PK study in rodents. The effects on respiratory depression were also assessed and confirmed in two separate rodent studies performing blood gas analysis and measuring O2 saturation. 

Results: BDH-001 (combination of subanalgesic BUP dose and CBD) resulted in statistically significant increases in pain threshold compared to saline (p < 0.001), CBD alone (p < 0.01), and BUP alone (p < 0.05). The half-life of BUP was significantly shorter in the presence of CBD compared to BUP alone (p = 0.008), with no significant changes in any other BUP pharmacokinetic parameter assessed. CBD was found to attenuate BUP-induced respiratory depression in rats when assessing blood gases (p < 0.05) and O2 saturation (p < 0.05) over several time bins. 

Conclusions: Data obtained in the present study indicate the addition of CBD to BUP was opioid-sparing and attenuated BUP- but not morphine-induced respiratory depression. There was no evidence these findings were the result of a PK interaction. Results support the hypothesis that BDH-001, a fixed-dose combination of BUP and CBD, may provide effective analgesia with a more favorable safety profile.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40468945/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2025.0004

“Buprenorphine is a medication that plays a crucial role in treating opioid use disorder (OUD), also known as opioid addiction. It works by partially activating the same receptors in the brain as opioids, helping to reduce withdrawal symptoms and cravings without producing the intense euphoria or dangerous side effects associated with full opioid agonists like heroin or fentanyl.”

Effects of combined CBGA and cannabis-derived terpene nanoformulations on TRPV1 activation: Implications for enhanced pain management

pubmed logo

“Cannabinoids and terpenes, key bioactive components of cannabis, are increasingly studied for their individual and combined contributions to the therapeutic potential of cannabis-based treatments, with ongoing research exploring their distinct and interactive effects.

This study aimed to encapsulate cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) in poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PEG-PLGA NPs) and investigate the effects of combining CBGA NPs with cannabis-derived terpene-loaded NPs (myrcene [MC], nerolidol [NL], and caryophyllene [CPh]) for potential applications in pain management.

CBGA NPs (152 nm) and terpene-loaded NPs (233-297 nm) were prepared via nanoprecipitation and emulsion-solvent evaporation, respectively, exhibiting a polydispersity index < 0.3 and negative zeta potentials (-23 to -26 mV). Encapsulation efficiency was 98.6 % for CBGA and 13-33 % for terpenes. CBGA release followed a biphasic profile, with ∼ 20 % released within 4 h and sustained release over 72 h. In vitro evaluation used HEK293 cells expressing the nociceptive transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) channel, a key mediator of pain perception. TRPV1 activation was assessed via calcium influx kinetics (Fluo-4 indicator). The EC50 values were 23.8 µg/mL (CBGA NPs), 8.0 µg/mL (MC NPs), 6.7 µg/mL (NL NPs), and 13.3 µg/mL (CPh NPs). Combinatorial treatments of CBGA NPs with terpene NPs at their respective EC50 concentrations revealed significantly enhanced calcium influx compared to individual NPs, with the strongest interaction observed for CBGA/NL and moderate effects for CBGA/MC. Fluorescence imaging further corroborated these findings.

These results suggest that combining CBGA NPs with terpene-loaded NPs could potentiate pain-relief efficacy, offering a promising strategy for advanced therapeutic formulations.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40419035/

“Cannabis sativa has long been valued for its diverse medicinal properties.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517325006039?via%3Dihub

Full spectrum cannabis oil combined with omega-3 fish oil for neuropathic pain management: a novel therapeutic approach

pubmed logo

“Objectives: Current pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain have limited efficacy and may cause undesirable side effects. Cannabidiol (CBD)-enriched cannabis oil and omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3) have emerged as potential therapeutic options due to their analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. This study aimed to assess the antinociceptive effects of combining CBD-enriched cannabis oil and ω-3 in rat models of acute and neuropathic pain.

Methods: Using the hot plate test for acute pain and the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model for neuropathic pain, thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity were evaluated. Additionally, walking track analysis and the rotarod test assessed functional recovery of the sciatic nerve. Beyond that, the histological analysis of sciatic nerves exposed the neuropathological findings of the treatments.

Key findings: The combined treatment of CBD-enriched cannabis oil and ω-3 effectively prevented thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity, while also improving motor impairment-induced peripheral neuropathy. Finally, combination treatment showed a protective effect against degeneration resulting from CCI.

Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential of CBD-enriched cannabis oil and ω-3 as a novel therapeutic approach for neuropathic pain management, offering promising implications for future research and clinical practice.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40414709/

https://academic.oup.com/jpp/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jpp/rgaf027/8148741?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

Oral cannabinoid formulation elevates sensory nerve conduction velocity and mitigates oxidative stress to alleviate neuropathic pain in rats

pubmed logo

“Background and aim: Use of potent painkillers like opiates are limited by their abuse potential and adverse physiological effects necessitating new therapeutics for pain management. This study assessed the efficacy of oral cannabinoid formulations (F1-F4) in alleviating chronic neuropathic pain (CP) and investigated their mechanisms through thermal algesia, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV).

Experimental procedures: A 21-day rat model of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve was used to evaluate the effects of oral cannabinoid formulations (F1: 500 mg, F2: 1000 mg, F3: 2000 mg, F4: 3000 mg) in MCT oil, with pregabalin as the reference. Male Wistar rats (35) were divided equally into seven groups, with all except the Sham group undergoing sciatic nerve ligation and receiving different formulations.On day 22, behavioral (hot plate, tail flick) and electrophysiological (sensory nerve conduction velocity, SNCV) assessments were performed. SNCV was also measured in the presence of CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists. Additionally, blood-based markers of inflammation (TNF-α) and oxidative stress (MDA, GSH and CAT) were analysed.

Results and conclusions: The vehicle group exhibited significant hyperalgesia (p <0.005), reduced sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) (p <0.005) and elevated MDA and TNF-α levels, along with decreased GSH and CAT levels in both serum and sciatic nerve tissue.Among the formulations, F2 significantly improved pain latency and SNCV (p <0.005) compared to the vehicle group and outperformed F1, F3, F4 and pregabalin (p <0.05). Its effects were mediated through CB1 and CB2 receptor agonism while simultaneously reducing oxidative stress and inflammation, highlighting its potential as a promising candidate for neuropathic pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40336142/

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01616412.2025.2500112

Cannabinoids: Therapeutic Perspectives for Management of Orofacial Pain, Oral Inflammation and Bone Healing-A Systematic Review

pubmed logo

“Cannabinoids, particularly cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have been increasingly studied for their therapeutic applications in various medical fields. This systematic review aims to explore their role in oral surgery, focusing on pain management, inflammation control, and bone regeneration.

A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA framework to identify relevant studies from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases published up to November 2024. The review included clinical and preclinical studies investigating the effects of cannabinoids on orofacial pain, oral inflammation, and bone healing. Data on study design, cannabinoid types, and relevant outcomes were extracted and analyzed. CBD was the most commonly studied compound, with other studies evaluating CB1/CB2 receptor agonists, THC, and cannabis smoke.

Clinical trials showed mixed results: some studies found CBD effective in reducing dental or myofascial pain, while others found limited or non-superior outcomes compared to standard treatments (e.g., NSAIDs, corticosteroids). Among the four RCTs, three had a low risk of bias, and one moderate; all nine animal studies had a high risk of bias.

In conclusion, preclinical and clinical studies suggest that cannabinoids represent a promising non-opioid alternative for pain management and for oral inflammation.

Although some evidence suggests potential benefits of cannabinoids, particularly CBD, in oral health contexts, findings are derived from heterogeneous studies-many with high risk of bias. More high-quality, standardized clinical trials are necessary before recommending cannabinoids for routine dental practice.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40332414/

“Within the limitations of this review, cannabinoids—especially cannabidiol (CBD)—demonstrated potential in managing orofacial pain, reducing inflammation, and promoting bone healing.”

https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/8/3766

Cost-Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis Versus Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain

pubmed logo

“Background: Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) affects one in five adults and is commonly managed with long-term opioid therapy. Concerns regarding rare but catastrophic harms associated with opioids, including overdose and death, have generated interest in alternatives including cannabis; however, the comparative cost-effectiveness of these management options is uncertain. 

Methods: We used findings from a network meta-analysis of 90 randomized trials to develop a 1-year microsimulation model to compare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) between oral medical cannabis and opioids for CNCP. We used a publicly funded health care payer perspective for our analyses and obtained cost and utility data from publicly available sources. All costs are reported in 2023 Canadian dollars. All analyses were probabilistic, and we conducted sensitivity and scenario analyses to assess robustness. 

Results: Total mean annual cost per patient was $1,980 for oral medical cannabis and $1,851 for opioids, a difference of $129 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -$723 to $525). Mean QALYs were 0.582 for both oral medical cannabis and opioids (95% CI: -0.007 to 0.015). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that oral medical cannabis was cost-effective in 31% of iterations at willingness-to-pay thresholds up to $50,000/QALY gained.

Use of opioids is associated with nonfatal and fatal overdose, whereas medical cannabis is not. 

Discussion: Our findings suggest that medical cannabis as an alternative to opioids for chronic pain may confer similar, but modest, benefits to patients, and reduce the risk of opioid overdose without substantially increasing costs.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40304409/

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/can.2024.0120

Cannabinoids in neuropathic pain treatment: pharmacological insights and clinical outcomes from recent trials

pubmed logo

“Neuropathic pain, a complex and often devastating condition, poses significant challenges for its effective management. Despite promising research on various cannabis formulations and delivery methods for neuropathic pain, significant gaps remain in our knowledge.

While inhaled cannabis shows analgesic effects and alternative delivery methods may improve bioavailability, oral formulations have yielded mixed results, often limited by small sample sizes and placebo effects. Therefore, further research is essential to optimize cannabis formulations, identify responder profiles to tailor treatments effectively, and, most critically, confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of cannabis-based therapies in managing NP.

This review article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the therapeutic potential of cannabis-based medicines, with a particular focus on cannabinoids. This review, though not systematic, examines 11 clinical studies, specifically Randomised Clinical Trials) published from 2014 to 2024, highlighting the efficacy of numerous cannabis formulations, in alleviating neuropathic pain.

Key findings show that cannabinoids can reduce pain perception, improve patient quality of life, and mitigate other symptoms associated with neuropathic pain.

The synergistic effects of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol are discussed, emphasizing their ability to enhance analgesic effects, while potentially reducing the psychoactive side effects of tetrahydrocannabinol.

This review emphasizes the importance of the personalized approach to improve therapeutic outcomes. Limitations of the existing research focusing on cannabis for neuropathic pain are limited by heterogeneity, lack of standardization, small sample sizes, and reliance on subjective outcomes, impacting the reliability and generalizability of findings. However, this exhaustive review aims to inform clinicians and researchers about the evolving role of cannabis in contemporary pain management strategies, illustrating the diverse pharmacological profiles of cannabinoids and their potential as adjunct therapies for neuropathic pain management.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40261351/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00210-025-04134-7

Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management: A Review of the History, Efficacy, Applications, and Risks

pubmed logo

“Background/Objectives: Chronic pain remains a pervasive and challenging public health issue, often resistant to conventional treatments such as opioids, which carry substantial risks of dependency and adverse effects. Cannabinoids, bioactive compounds derived from the Cannabis sativa plant and their synthetic analogs, have emerged as a potential alternative for pain management, leveraging their interaction with the endocannabinoid system to modulate pain and inflammation. 

Methods: The current, evolving literature regarding the history, efficacy, applications, and safety of cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic pain was reviewed and summarized to provide the most current review of cannabinoids. 

Results: Evidence suggests that cannabinoids provide moderate efficacy in managing neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, cancer-related pain, and multiple sclerosis-related spasticity. Patient-reported outcomes further indicate widespread perceptions of cannabinoids as a safer alternative to opioids, with potential opioid-sparing effects. However, the quality of existing evidence is limited by small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Regulatory barriers, including the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I substance in the United States, continue to hinder robust research and clinical integration. Moreover, the risks associated with cannabinoids, such as psychiatric effects, addiction potential, and drug interactions, necessitate cautious application. 

Conclusions: Cannabinoids represent a promising, albeit complex, alternative for chronic pain management, particularly given the limitations and risks of traditional therapies such as opioids. However, significant deficiencies remain in the research. While smaller trials and systematic reviews indicate therapeutic potential, the quality of evidence is often low due to limited sample sizes, short study durations, and methodological inconsistencies. Large-scale, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are urgently needed to confirm efficacy and safety across diverse patient populations and pain etiologies.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40149508/

“The future for cannabis research is bright, and as regulatory frameworks adapt to balance access and oversight, cannabinoids may transition from an experimental adjunct to a well-established option in chronic pain care, provided scientific rigor and evidence-based policymaking remain at the forefront.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/13/3/530

Terpene blends from Cannabis sativa are cannabimimetic and antinociceptive in a mouse chronic neuropathic pain model via activation of adenosine A2a receptors

pubmed logo

“An increase in the use of medicinal Cannabis for pain management has spurred research into the understudied bioactive compounds in Cannabis, such as terpenes.

In our previous work, we showed that isolated and purified terpenes were cannabimimetic and also relieved chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) pain via activation of Adenosine A2a Receptors (A2aR) in the spinal cord. However, terpenes are most often consumed by the public as complex extracts and mixtures, not purified individual terpenes, and whether this cannabimimetic and antinociceptive activity holds true in terpene extracts and blends is not clear.

In this study, we thus extracted terpene blends from three distinct Cannabis chemovars and assessed these blends in male and female CD-1 mice for their cannabimimetic activity in the tetrad assay and pain-relieving properties in a CIPN model.

Each terpene blend was unique in the relative amounts of different terpenes extracted. Though each blend was unique, each similarly elicited cannabimimetic behaviors of catalepsy, hyperlocomotion, and hypothermia, without tail flick analgesia.

All three terpene blends effectively relieved CIPN, though the antinociception was more robust in male than in female mice. This antinociception was recapitulated by purified Myrcene but not D-Limonene. The A2aR antagonist istradefylline blocked the pain-relieving effects of all three terpene blends, suggesting that the terpene blends act on A2aR to relieve CIPN pain.

Together, these findings suggest that terpene blends have similar pharmacological effects as purified single terpenes, and that observations made with single terpenes may be applicable to the complex terpene mixtures commonly consumed by the public.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40122228/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030439402500093X?via%3Dihub

Cannabidiol reduces neuropathic pain and cognitive impairments through activation of spinal PPARγ

pubmed logo

“The purpose of this study was to evaluate the participation of spinal peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) in the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol, the expression of PPARγ in sites relevant to the spinal nociceptive processing, and the effect of this cannabinoid on cognitive deficits induced by neuropathic pain in female mice.

Either acute or repeated treatment with cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia and spontaneous pain (flinching) in female neuropathic mice. Pioglitazone partially reduced tactile allodynia, and this effect was fully blocked by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. Likewise, intrathecal injection of cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia, while PPARγ antagonist GW9662 or 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635, but not the PPARα antagonist GW6479, partially prevented this effect. GW9662 and WAY-100635 administrated per se did not modify tactile allodynia in neuropathic female mice. Co-administration of GW9662 and WAY-100635 fully prevented the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol in mice. Nerve injury up-regulated PPARγ expression at the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia, while cannabidiol further enhanced nerve injury-induced up-regulation of PPARγ expression in both tissues.

Repeated intrathecal injection of cannabidiol reduced tactile allodynia and several pain makers (ERK, p-ERK, p38MAPK and p-p38MAPK). In addition, this treatment restored nerve injury-induced interleukin-10 down-regulation and increased PPARγ expression at the spinal cord. Repeated treatment with cannabidiol also improved nerve injury-induced cognitive impairment in mice.

These results provide compelling evidence for the involvement of PPARγ in the antiallodynic effect of cannabidiol in mice and highlight its multifaceted therapeutic potential in neuropathic pain management and its comorbidities.

PERSPECTIVE: The present study reveals cannabidiol’s dual effects in female mice by reducing neuropathic pain through spinal PPARγ and 5-HT1A receptor activation and ameliorating nerve injury-induced cognitive impairment. These findings may assist clinicians seeking new therapeutic approaches for managing neuropathic pain and its associated cognitive deficits.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40112940/

https://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(25)00605-4/abstract