Substituting cannabis for prescription drugs, alcohol and other substances among medical cannabis patients: The impact of contextual factors.

“The present study examines the use of cannabis as a substitute for alcohol, illicit substances and prescription drugs among 473 adults who use cannabis for therapeutic purposes.

Substituting cannabis for one or more of alcohol, illicit drugs or prescription drugs was reported by 87% of respondents, with 80.3% reporting substitution for prescription drugs, 51.7% for alcohol, and 32.6% for illicit substances.

Respondents who reported substituting cannabis for prescription drugs were more likely to report difficulty affording sufficient quantities of cannabis, and patients under 40 years of age were more likely to substitute cannabis for all three classes of substance than older patients.

The finding that cannabis was substituted for all three classes of substances suggests that the medical use of cannabis may play a harm reduction role in the context of use of these substances,”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26364922

Responsible and controlled use: Older cannabis users and harm reduction.

“Cannabis use is becoming more accepted in mainstream society. In this paper, we use Zinberg’s classic theoretical framework of drug, set, and setting to elucidate how older adult cannabis users managed health, social and legal risks in a context of normalized cannabis use…

Interviewees made harm reduction choices based on preferred cannabis derivatives and routes of administration, as well as why, when, where, and with whom to use. Most interviewees minimized cannabis-related harms so they could maintain social functioning in their everyday lives. Responsible and controlled use was described as moderation of quantity and frequency of cannabis used, using in appropriate settings, and respect for non-users. Users contributed to the normalization of cannabis use through normification.

Participants followed rituals or cultural practices, characterized by sanctions that helped define “normal” or “acceptable” cannabis use. Users contributed to cannabis normalization through their harm reduction methods.

These cultural practices may prove to be more effective than formal legal prohibitions in reducing cannabis-related harms.

Findings also suggest that users with access to a regulated market (medical cannabis dispensaries) were better equipped to practice harm reduction.

More research is needed on both cannabis culture and alternative routes of administration as harm reduction methods.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25911027

Prescribing cannabis for harm reduction

“Neuropathic pain affects between 5% and 10% of the US population and can be refractory to treatment. Opioids may be recommended as a second-line pharmacotherapy but have risks including overdose and death. Cannabis has been shown to be effective for treating nerve pain without the risk of fatal poisoning. The author suggests that physicians who treat neuropathic pain with opioids should evaluate their patients for a trial of cannabis and prescribe it when appropriate prior to using opioids. This harm reduction strategy may reduce the morbidity and mortality rates associated with prescription pain medications.”

“Medicine relies upon the principle of, “First, do no harm,” and one might supplement the axiom to read – “First, do no harm, and second, reduce all the harm you can.” “Harm reduction” or “harm minimization” can be defined in the broadest sense as strategies designed to reduce risk or harm. Those harmed may include the individual, others impacted by the harmed person, and society. The substitution of a safer drug for one that is more dangerous is considered harm reduction. Specific examples of HR include prescribing methadone or buprenorphine to replace heroin, prescribing nicotine patches to be used instead of smoking tobacco, and prescribing intranasal naloxone to patients on opioid therapy to be utilized in case of overdose. Substituting cannabis for prescribed opioids may be considered a harm reduction strategy.”

“Under the Federal Controlled Substance Act “marihuana” is illegal and classified as a schedule I substance-meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. However, sixteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for medicinal use and these include Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. Each state law differs but all allow physicians to “authorize” or “recommend” cannabis for specific ailments. This “recommendation” affords legal protections for patients to obtain and use medicinal cannabis, and may be considered the “prescription.””

“Cannabis (Cannabis sativa) and the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum) are both ancient plants that have been used medicinally for thousands of years. The natural and synthetic derivatives of opium, including morphine, are called “opioids.”  “Cannabinoids” is the term for a class of compounds within cannabis of which delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most familiar. Besides THC, approximately 100 other cannabinoids have been identified including one of special scientific interest called “cannabidiol” (CBD). The human body produces both endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) and opioids (endorphins) and contains specific receptors for these substances. There is an extensive literature on opioids but far less on cannabis/cannabinoids (CC).”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295721/