Abstract
“The ECS (endocannabinoid system) plays an important role in the onset of obesity and metabolic disorders, implicating central and peripheral mechanisms predominantly via CB1 (cannabinoid type 1) receptors. CB1 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist treatment improves cardiometabolic risk factors and insulin resistance. However, the relative contribution of peripheral organs to the net beneficial metabolic effects remains unclear. In the present study, we have identified the presence of the endocannabinoid signalling machinery in skeletal muscle and also investigated the impact of an HFD (high-fat diet) on lipid-metabolism-related genes and endocannabinoid-related proteins. Finally, we tested whether administration of the CB1 inverse agonist AM251 restored the alterations induced by the HFD. Rats were fed on either an STD (standard/low-fat diet) or an HFD for 10 weeks and then treated with AM251 (3 mg/kg of body weight per day) for 14 days. The accumulated caloric intake was progressively higher in rats fed on the HFD than the STD, resulting in a divergence in body weight gain. AM251 treatment reduced accumulated food/caloric intake and body weight gain, being more marked in rats fed on the HFD. CB2 (cannabinoid type 2) receptor and PPARα (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor α) gene expression was decreased in HFD-fed rats, whereas MAGL (monoglyceride lipase) gene expression was up-regulated. These data suggest an altered endocannabinoid signalling as a result of the HFD. AM251 treatment reduced CB2 receptor, PPARγ and AdipoR1 (adiponectin receptor 1) gene expression in STD-fed rats, but only partially normalized the CB2 receptor in HFD-fed rats. Protein levels corroborated gene expression results, but also showed a decrease in DAGL (diacylglycerol) β and DAGLα after AM251 treatment in STD- and HFD-fed rats respectively. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate a diet-sensitive ECS in skeletal muscle, suggesting that blockade of C1 receptors could work towards restoration of the metabolic adaption imposed by diet.”
“In the present study, we focused on skeletal muscles, which are an important tissue for glucose and fat oxidation, being an important site for insulin action [27]. However, despite the fact that AEA can modify the pathways regulating fatty acid oxidation in the skeletal muscle, probably via CB1 receptors, suggesting that CB1 receptor antagonism would have an important role in oxidative metabolism and energy regulation [28,29], there is still a general lack of clarity regarding the physiological functions and molecular mechanism implicated. In fact, there are almost no studies demonstrating the presence of endocannabinoid signalling proteins and their sensitivity to HFDs (high-fat diets). Therefore, in the present study, we have (i) investigated the presence of the endocannabinoid signalling machinery in skeletal muscle, (ii) analysed the impact of an HFD on lipid and glucose metabolism and endocannabinoid-related genes, and (iii) monitored the effects of the CB1 receptor inverse agonist AM251 during an STD (standard/low-fat diet) and HFD on the endocannabinoid machinery and the genes related to lipid oxidative metabolism in skeletal muscle of rats. Among the many molecules involved in lipid metabolism of skeletal muscle, we evaluated changes in the gene and protein expression of relevant components of the ECS, such as the CB1 and CB2 receptors and some of the enzymes responsible for their synthesis.
The presence of the ECS in skeletal muscle
As a final note, the regulatory mechanisms may be different at rest and during exercise, may change as the exercise intensity increases, and this could be influential in endocannabinoid production [31,49]. It would be interesting to repeat this type of experiment combining exercise and diet in its original design. Regulation of skeletal muscle fat and glucose metabolism is clearly multifactorial, and different mechanisms may dominate in different conditions; besides, potential variations may exist between individuals in response to stimulating or blocking CB1 receptors. This could cause differences in response to treatment with CB1 receptor antagonists between different obese states. In conclusion, we have provided findings identifying important relevant players involved in the signalling pathways of CB1 receptor antagonism in skeletal muscle and determined the extent of changes in this system associated with either an HFD or CB1 receptor blockade.”