Category Archives: Cerebral Ischemia

Activation of Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor-Mediated AMPK/CREB Pathway Reduces Cerebral Ischemic Injury.

Posted on by
Reply

“The type 2 cannabinoid receptor (CB2R) was recently shown to mediate neuroprotection in ischemic injury. However, the role of CB2Rs in the central nervous system, especially neuronal and glial CB2Rs in the cortex, remains unclear. We, therefore, investigated anti-ischemic mechanisms of cortical CB2R activation in various ischemic models….

  Collectively, these data demonstrate that cortical CB2R activation by TC (trans-caryophyllene, a CB2R agonist,), ameliorates ischemic injury, potentially through modulation of AMPK/CREB signaling, and suggest that cortical CB2Rs might serve as a putative therapeutic target for cerebral ischemia.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23414569

Targeting the endocannabinoid system to limit myocardial and cerebral ischemic and reperfusion injury.

Posted on by
Reply

“Coronary and carotid arterial occlusion due to thrombosis after atherosclerotic plaque rupture is the major cause of myocardial and cerebral infarction. Together these acute events represent the leading cause of death worldwide. Early reperfusion is the best method to salvage the ischemic organ; however, it leads to additional damage known as reperfusion injury. A large number of experimental studies has been performed in the past aimed at targeting individual mediators of reperfusion injury such as treatment with anti-oxidants or anti-inflammatory agents. Although many agents proved beneficial in animal models of myocardial or cerebral ischemia/reperfusion, the attempts to translate these protective effects into clinical practice were mostly disappointing. Elucidating the complex cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in ischemic cell death is crucial for the development of more efficient drugs in order to improve current treatment strategies. The aim of this review is to discuss cannabinoid and endocannabinoid-mediated effects in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction and reperfusion injury, post-myocardial infarction remodeling, as well as ischemic stroke and reperfusion injury.

 We report experimental evidence suggesting that targeting the endocannabinoid system might evolve as a novel therapeutic concept to limit the devastating consequences of these acute vascular events through a wide variety of mechanisms, including lowering inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis, and excitotoxicity, and enhanced blood flow.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21470162

Modulation of The Balance Between Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptor Activation During Cerebral Ischemic/Reperfusion Injury

Posted on by
Reply

“A number of investigations have shown that CB2 receptor activation has anti-inflammatory therapeutic potential in various CNS diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer’s disease. Because inflammatory responses have been shown to be important contributors to secondary injury following cerebral ischemia; the CB2 receptor has been investigated as a potential therapeutic target in stroke…

The most striking changes were obtained by combing a CB1 antagonist with a CB2 agonist. This combination elevated the cerebral blood flow during ischemia and reduced infarction by 75%…during cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury, inhibition of CB1 receptor activation is protective while inhibition of CB2 receptor activation is detrimental.

 The greatest degree of neuroprotection was obtained by combining an inhibitor of CB1 activation with an exogenous CB2 agonist.

In conclusion, the results of this investigation demonstrate dynamic changes in the expression of CB1 and CB2 receptors during cerebral ischemic/reperfusion injury in mice. The effects of stimulation of these receptors on damage ischemia/reperfusion injury differed dramatically. Stimulation of the CB2 receptor was found to be neuroprotective, while inhibition of the CB1 receptor was also protective,too. The combination of a CB2 agonist and a CB1 antagonist provided the greatest degree of protection and indicated a synergistic effect derived from combining these agents. Therefore, changing the balance of stimulation of these receptors by endogenous cannabinoids may provide an important therapeutic strategy during stroke.”

Full text: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2577828/

Role of cannabinoids and endocannabinoids in cerebral ischemia

Posted on by
Reply

“The human costs of stroke are very large and growing; it is the third largest cause of death in the United States and survivors are often faced with loss of ability to function independently. There is a large need for therapeutic approaches that act to protect neurons from the injury produced by ischemia and reperfusion… 

 Overall, the available data suggest that inhibition of CB1 receptor activation together with increased CB2 receptor activation produces beneficial effects.

These studies support the hypothesis that activation of the CB1 receptor by highly efficacious, exogenous agonists during the acute phase of ischemia decreases the likelihood of the occurrence of a detrimental event at the time of ischemia and thereby reduces the amount of infarction and neuronal death long-term… A protective role of the CB1 receptor is also supported by studies…

While it is possible that the ECS will be added to the long list of neuroprotective agents that show promise in animals and do not work in humans, there are a few reasons to be optimistic about this class of drugs. First, many of the other agents did not work because they do not cross the blood brain barrier. While the considerable lipophilicity of the cannabinoids poses its own set of problems, these drugs have no problems entering the brain. Second, the ECS is multifactorial and could “cover” multiple biochemical pathways in a single drug. Third, manipulations of the ECS has been shown to be beneficial in several preclinical models. Only time and further research will answer the most important question, are the cannabinoids of therapeutic benefit in humans suffering from stroke?”

Full text: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2581413/

 

Endocannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors in ischaemia–reperfusion injury and preconditioning

Posted on by
Reply

“This review is aimed to discuss the role of endocannabinoids and CB receptors in various forms of I/R injury (myocardial, cerebral, hepatic and circulatory shock) and preconditioning, and to delineate the evidence supporting the therapeutic utility of selective CB2 receptor agonists, which are devoid of psychoactive effects, as a promising new approach to limit I/R-induced tissue damage.

In this review, we will discuss the triggers and sources of endocannabinoid production during various forms of I/R injury (myocardial, cerebral, hepatic and retinal ischaemia, and circulatory shock) and preconditioning, as well as the diverse role of these novel mediators and their receptors in these processes. We will also overview the accumulating evidence obtained through the use of various synthetic CB1/CB2 receptor ligands, with particular focus on the novel role of CB2 receptors, suggesting that the modulation of the endocannabinoid system can be therapeutically exploited in various forms of I/R injury.

Cerebral I/R (stroke)

The first evidence for the neuroprotective effect of CBs came from the stroke research field from studies using synthetic non-psychotropic CB Dexanabinol/HU-211, which exerted its beneficial effects through CB1/CB2-independent mechanisms.

Collectively, it appears that both CB1 agonists and antagonists may afford neuroprotective effects against cerebral I/R…

There is considerable interest in the development of selective CB2 receptor agonists, which are devoid of psychoactive properties of CB1 agonists, for various inflammatory disorders. Further studies should also establish the therapeutic window of protection during the reperfusion phase with the currently available CB2 receptor agonists, and new compounds should also be designed with better in vivo bioavailability, to devise clinically relevant treatment strategies against various forms of I/R. Nevertheless, the recently observed beneficial effects of CB2 receptor agonists in hepatic and other forms of I/R, coupled with the absence of psychoactive properties, and antifibrotic effects of CB2 receptor in the liver suggest that this approach may represent a novel promising strategy against various forms of I/R injury and other inflammatory disorders.”

Full text: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2219536/

The seek of neuroprotection: introducing cannabinoids.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“The cannabinoid system is constituted by some endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), usually arachydonic acid derivatives, and their specific receptors. The endogenous cannabinoid system (ECS) is involved in the control of synaptic transmission, modulating memory, motivation, movement, nociception, appetite and thermoregulation. ECS also exert extraneural effects, mainly immunomodulation and vasodilation. Two cannabinoid receptors have been cloned so far: CB(1) receptors are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) but can also be found in glial cells and in peripheral tissues; CB(1) receptors are Gi/o protein coupled receptors that modulate the activity of several plasma membrane proteins and intracellular signaling pathways. CB(2) receptors are also Gi/o protein-coupled receptors; although it is accepted that CB(2) receptors are not expressed in forebrain neurons, they have been described in activated glia. Some of the cannabinoids activate other receptors, for instance vanilloid receptors (TRPV1). Lately, the ECS is emerging as a natural system of neuroprotection. This consideration is based on some properties of cannabinoids as their vasodilatory effect, the inhibition of the release of excitotoxic amino acids and cytokines, and the modulation of oxidative stress and toxic production of nitric oxide. Such effects have been demonstrated in adult and newborn animal models of acute and chronic neurodegenerative conditions, and postulate cannabinoids as valuable neuroprotective agents. Patents related to cannabinoid receptors are also discussed.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18221224

The therapeutic potential of the cannabinoids in neuroprotection.

Posted on by
1

Abstract

“After thousands of years of interest the last few decades have seen a huge increase in our knowledge of the cannabinoids and their mode of action. Their potential as medical therapeutics has long been known. However, very real concerns over their safety and efficacy have lead to caution and suspicion when applying the legislature of modern medicine to these compounds. The ability of this diverse family of compounds to modulate neurotransmission and act as anti-inflammatory and antioxidative agents has prompted researchers to investigate their potential as neuroprotective agents. Indeed, various cannabinoids rescue dying neurones in experimental forms of acute neuronal injury, such as cerebral ischaemia and traumatic brain injury. Cannabinoids also provide symptomatic relief in experimental models of chronic neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and Huntington’s disease. This preclinical evidence has provided the impetus for the launch of a number of clinical trials in various conditions of neurodegeneration and neuronal injury using compounds derived from the cannabis plant. Our understanding of cannabinoid neurobiology, however, must improve if we are to effectively exploit this system and take advantage of the numerous characteristics that make this group of compounds potential neuroprotective agents.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12387700

Cannabinoids and neuroprotection.

Posted on by
Reply

Abstract

“Cannabinoid compounds are endowed with pharmacological properties that make them interesting candidates for therapeutic development. These properties have been known since antiquity. However, in the last decade extremely important advances in the understanding of the physiology, pharmacology, and molecular biology of the cannabinoid system have given this field of research fresh impetus and have renewed the interest in the possible clinical exploitation of these compounds. In the present review we summarize the effects elicited, at the cellular level, by cannabinoids acting through receptor-dependent and receptor-independent mechanisms. These data suggest different ways by which cannabinoids may act as neuroprotective agents (prevention of excitotoxicity by inhibition of glutamate release, antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory actions, etc.). The experimental evidence supporting these hypotheses are presented and discussed with regard to both preclinical and clinical studies in disease states such as cerebral ischemia, brain trauma, and Multiple Sclerosis.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11831553

From cannabis to the endocannabinoid system: refocussing attention on potential clinical benefits.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for West Indian Med J

“Cannabis sativa is one of the oldest herbal remedies known to man. Over the past four thousand years, it has been used for the treatment of numerous diseases but due to its psychoactive properties, its current medicinal usage is highly restricted. In this review, we seek to highlight advances made over the last forty years in the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the effects of cannabis on the human body and how these can potentially be utilized in clinical practice. During this time, the primary active ingredients in cannabis have been isolated, specific cannabinoid receptors have been discovered and at least five endogenous cannabinoid neurotransmitters (endocannabinoids) have been identified. Together, these form the framework of a complex endocannabinoid signalling system that has widespread distribution in the body and plays a role in regulating numerous physiological processes within the body. Cannabinoid ligands are therefore thought to display considerable therapeutic potential and the drive to develop compounds that can be targeted to specific neuronal systems at low enough doses so as to eliminate cognitive side effects remains the ‘holy grail’ of endocannabinoid research.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155985

Targeting the endocannabinoid system with cannabinoid receptor agonists: pharmacological strategies and therapeutic possibilities.

Posted on by
Reply

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences: 367 (1607)

“Human tissues express cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors that can be activated by endogenously released ‘endocannabinoids’ or exogenously administered compounds in a manner that reduces the symptoms or opposes the underlying causes of several disorders in need of effective therapy. Three medicines that activate cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors are now in the clinic: Cesamet (nabilone), Marinol (dronabinol; Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC)) and Sativex (Δ(9)-THC with cannabidiol). These can be prescribed for the amelioration of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (Cesamet and Marinol), stimulation of appetite (Marinol) and symptomatic relief of cancer pain and/or management of neuropathic pain and spasticity in adults with multiple sclerosis (Sativex). This review mentions several possible additional therapeutic targets for cannabinoid receptor agonists. These include other kinds of pain, epilepsy, anxiety, depression, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, cancer, drug dependence, glaucoma, autoimmune uveitis, osteoporosis, sepsis, and hepatic, renal, intestinal and cardiovascular disorders. It also describes potential strategies for improving the efficacy and/or benefit-to-risk ratio of these agonists in the clinic. These are strategies that involve (i) targeting cannabinoid receptors located outside the blood-brain barrier, (ii) targeting cannabinoid receptors expressed by a particular tissue, (iii) targeting upregulated cannabinoid receptors, (iv) selectively targeting cannabinoid CB(2) receptors, and/or (v) adjunctive ‘multi-targeting’.”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23108552

“Targeting the endocannabinoid system with cannabinoid receptor agonists: pharmacological strategies and therapeutic possibilities”  http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1607/3353.long