Tag Archives: therapeutic

The synthetic cannabinoids attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

Posted on by
Reply

 

“Trigeminal neuralgia is a disorder of paroxysmal and severely disabling facial pain and continues to be a real therapeutic challenge.

At present there are few effective drugs. Here we have evaluated the effects of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 on mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain produced by a chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminalnerve (ION).

Taken together, these results suggest that cannabinoids may be a useful therapeutic approach for the clinical management of trigeminal neuropathic pain disorders.”

 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17572451

The CB1 Antagonist, SR141716A, Is Protective in Permanent Photothrombotic Cerebral Ischemia.

Posted on by
Reply

“Modulation of the endocannabinoid system has been shown to have a significant impact on outcomes in animal models of stroke.

We have previously reported a protective effect of the CB1 antagonist, SR141716A, in a transient reperfusion mouse model of cerebral ischemia. This protective effect was in part mediated by activation of the 5HT1A receptor.

Here we have examined its effect in a mouse model of permanent ischemia induced by photoinjury.

The CB1 antagonist was found to be protective in this model.

As was the case following transient ischemia reperfusion, SR141716A (5mg/kg) resulted in smaller infarct fractions and stroke volumes when utilized both as a pretreatment and as a post-treatment. In contrast to the effect in a transient ischemia model, the pretreatment effect did not depend on the 5HT1A receptor.

Neurological function correlated favorably to the reduction in stroke size when SR141716A was given as a pretreatment.

With the incidence of stroke predicted to rise in parallel with an ever aging population, understanding mechanisms underlying ischemia and therapeutics remains a paramount goal of research.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453059

Peripheral interactions between cannabinoid and opioid receptor agonists in a model of inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia.

Posted on by
Reply

“Activation of opioid and cannabinoid receptors expressed in nociceptors induces effective antihyperalgesia.

In this study, we examined whether combinations of opioid and cannabinoid receptor agonists directed at the injured site would enhance therapeutic effectiveness.

Our findings showed that MOR and CB1 agonists directed at the inflamed site effectively attenuate mechanical hyperalgesia when administered individually, but exert opposing effects when administered together.

The antagonistic interactions between the two classes of drugs at the inflamed site suggest distinct mechanisms unique to peripheral nociceptors or inflamed tissue, and therefore require further studies to investigate whether the therapeutic utility of the combined drug treatments in chronic pain conditions can be optimized.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450703

Type-2 Cannabinoid Receptors in Neurodegeneration.

Posted on by
Reply

“Based on its wide expression in immune cells, type 2 cannabinoid (CB2) receptors were traditionally thought to act as “peripheral receptors” with an almost exclusively immunomodulatory function. However, their recent identification in mammalian brain areas, as well as in distinct neuronal cells, has opened the way to a re-consideration of CB2 signaling in the context of brain pathophysiology, synaptic plasticity and neuroprotection. To date, accumulated evidence from several independent preclinical studies has offered new perspectives on the possible involvement of CB2signaling in brain and spinal cord traumatic injury, as well as in the most relevant neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s chorea. Here, we will review available information on CB2 in these disease conditions, along with data that support also its therapeutic potential to treat them.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450295

Discovery of novel Tetrahydrobenzo[b]thiophene and pyrrole based scaffolds as potent and selective CB2 receptor ligands: The structural elements controlling binding affinity, selectivity and functionality.

Posted on by
Reply

“CB2-based therapeutics show strong potential in the treatment of diverse diseases such as inflammation, multiple sclerosis, pain, immune-related disorders, osteoporosis and cancer, without eliciting the typical neurobehavioral side effects of CB1 ligands.

For this reason, research activities are currently directed towards the development of CB2 selective ligands. Herein, the synthesis of novel heterocyclic-based CB2 selective compounds is reported.

The present findings thus pave the way to the design and optimization of heterocyclic-based scaffolds with lipophilic carboxamide and/or retroamide substituent that can be exploited as potential CB2 receptor activity modulators.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448919

Cannabinoid Modulation of Cutaneous Aδ Nociceptors During Inflammation

Posted on by
Reply

Logo of jn

“Previous studies have demonstrated that locally administered cannabinoids attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia through activation of peripheral cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2).

These results suggest that attenuation of mechanically evoked responses of Aδ nociceptors contributes to the behavioral antinociception produced by activation of peripheral CB1 receptors during inflammation.

Several studies have demonstrated that locally administered cannabinoids produce antinociception in animal models of both acute and persistent pain through peripheral mechanisms.

Taken together, our data suggest that peripherally acting cannabinoids could be a potential therapeutic treatment for chronic inflammatory pain.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2585399/

 

Allosteric modulation of heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptors.

Posted on by
Reply

“G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are, and will probably remain, the most tractable class of targets for the development of small-molecule therapeutic medicines.

Currently, all approved GPCR-directed medicines are agonists or antagonists at orthosteric binding sites – except for the calcimimetic cinacalcet, which is a positive allosteric modulator of Ca(2+)-sensing receptors, and maraviroc, an allosteric inhibitor of CC-chemokine receptor (CCR) 5.

It is now widely accepted that GPCRs exist and might function as dimers, and there is growing evidence for the physiological presence and relevance of GPCR heterodimers.

Molecules that can regulate a GPCR within a heterodimer, through allosteric effects between the two protomers of the dimer or between a protomer or protomers and the associated G protein, offer the potential to function in a highly selective and tissue-specific way.

Despite the conceptual attraction of such allosteric regulators of GPCR heterodimers as drugs, they cannot be identified by screening approaches that routinely use a ‘one GPCR target at a time’ strategy.

In our opinion, this will require the development of new approaches for screening and a return to the use of physiologically relevant cell systems at an early stage in compound identification.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18022255

Enantiomeric cannabidiol derivatives: synthesis and binding to cannabinoid receptors.

Posted on by
Reply

“(-)-Cannabidiol (CBD) is a major, non psychotropic constituent of cannabis.

It has been shown to cause numerous physiological effects of therapeutic importance.

We have reported that CBD derivatives in both enantiomeric series are of pharmaceutical interest. Here we describe the syntheses of the major CBD metabolites, (-)-7-hydroxy-CBD and (-)-CBD-7-oic acid and their dimethylheptyl (DMH) homologs, as well as of the corresponding compounds in the enantiomeric (+)-CBD series. The starting materials were the respective CBD enantiomers and their DMH homologs.

The binding of these compounds to the CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors are compared.

Surprisingly, contrary to the compounds in the (-) series, which do not bind to the receptors, most of the derivatives in the (+) series bind to the CB(1) receptor in the low nanomole range. Some of these compounds also bind weakly to the CB(2) receptor.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15750656

Cannabinoid receptors in microglia of the central nervous system: immune functional relevance.

Posted on by
Reply

Cover

“Microglia, resident macrophages of the brain, function as immune effector and accessory cells. Paradoxically, they not only play a role in host defense and tissue repair but also have been implicated in a variety of neuropathological processes.

Microglia, in addition to exhibiting phenotypic markers for macrophages, express CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. Recent studies suggest the existence of a third, yet-to-be cloned, non-CB1, non-CB2 cannabinoid receptor.

These receptors appear to be functionally relevant within defined windows of microglial activation state and have been implicated as linked to cannabinoid modulation of chemokine and cytokine expression.

The recognition that microglia express cannabinoid receptors and that their activation results in modulation of select cellular activities suggests that they may be amenable to therapeutic manipulation for ablating untoward inflammatory responses in the central nervous system.”  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16204639

http://www.jleukbio.org/content/78/6/1192.long

 

The central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) mediates inhibition of nitric oxide production by rat microglial cells.

Posted on by
Reply

Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

“Upon activation, brain microglial cells release proinflammatory mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), which may play an important role in the central nervous system antibacterial, antiviral, and antitumor activities. However, excessive release of NO has been postulated to elicit immune-mediated neurodegenerative inflammatory processes and to cause brain injury.

In the present study, the effect of cannabinoids on the release of NO from endotoxin/cytokine-activated rat cortical microglial cells was evaluated.

Collectively, these results indicate a functional linkage between the CB1 receptor and cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of NO production by rat microglial cells.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027878

“In summary, this study reports on CB1 receptor expression in a primary immune cell type in the context of functional relevance. That is, the data support a linkage between the CB1 receptor as expressed in brain microglial cells and the inhibition of NO.
These results expand on our current knowledge concerning the role of cannabinoid receptors in the modulation of immune cell function as, to date, the CB2 receptor has been the only cannabinoid receptor subtype implicated in cannabinoid-mediated immune modulation.
These data suggest also that select cannabinoid agonists have the potential to ablate the elicitation of proinflammatory mediators especially under conditions of chronic neuropathological disease.”
http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/288/3/1357.long