Modulation Of The Endo-Cannabinoid System: Therapeutic Potential Against Cocaine Dependence

 “Dependence on cocaine is still a main unresolved medical and social concern, and in spite of research efforts, no pharmacological therapy against cocaine dependence is yet available. Recent studies have shown that the endocannabinoid system participates in specific stages and aspects of drug dependence in general, and some of this evidence suggests an involvement of the cannabinoid system in cocaine effects. For example, cocaine administration has been shown to alter brain endocannabinoid levels, and the endocannabinoid system has been involved in long-term modifications of brain processes that might play a role in neuro/behavioral effects of psychostimulant drugs like cocaine. Human studies show that marijuana dependence is frequently associated with cocaine dependence, and that the cannabinoid receptor CNR1 gene polymorphism might be related to cocaine addiction. This article will review the main papers in the field showing how a modulation of different components of the cannabinoid system might interact with some of the neurobiological/behavioral effects of cocaine related to its reinforcing effects, evaluated in preclinical models or in clinical settings. The goal of this review will be to provide insights into the complex picture of cocaine abuse and addiction, and to extrapolate from such endocannabinoid-cocaine interactions useful information to test the therapeutic potential of cannabinoid ligands and endocannabinoid-level enhancers against cocaine dependence for future preclinical/clinical trials.”

“Summary and concluding remarks

Most of the scientific articles reviewed in the present manuscript have described studies of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists and antagonists tested against cocaine effects in preclinical models thought to be predictive of cocaine abuse. These studies have provided interesting results, especially for the ability of cannabinoid antagonists, and Rimonabant in particular, to significantly counteract some of the reinforcing actions of cocaine (104, 143). Collectively, the studies suggest that a cannabinoid tone, impaired by cannabinoid antagonist administration, is indeed involved in many of the reinforcing effects of cocaine which are believed to be responsible for cocaine abuse and addiction. On the other hand, there are no studies available showing interactions of drugs acting as cannabinoid levels modulators/enhancers on cocaine-induced behaviors. These drugs affecting directly the endogenous cannabinoid tone could interfere with cocaine effects in these preclinical procedures and could substantially increase our knowledge about the cannabinoid-neurobiology related to cocaine dependence.”

“Suggestions about possible genetic predisposition/vulnerability to cocaine dependence from human studies due to variants of the cannabinoid receptor CNR1 gene have given more strength to the link between endocannabinoids and cocaine. Due to the widespread distribution of cannabinoid receptors in the brain, and their abundance in brain areas playing pivotal roles in drug abuse and addiction, the different expression and regulation of cannabinoid receptors induced by genetic differences might be an important factor in the predisposition or vulnerability to drug dependence. For this reason, the potential to directly interact with endocannabinoid tone in selected brain areas, an effect that can be obtained with endocannabinoid uptake inhibitors or metabolism blockers (as shown also in genetically modified mice, 170), as compared to widespread actions of cannabinoid receptors agonists/antagonists, should be one of the next challenges in the research for medications able to counteract the abuse- and dependence-related behavioral/neurobiological effects of cocaine.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2134985/

Current evidence supporting a role of cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists as potential pharmacotherapies for drug abuse disorders.

Abstract

“Since the discovery of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) in 1988, and subsequently of the CB2 receptor (CB2R) in 1993, there has been an exponential growth of research investigating the functions of the endocannabinoid system. The roles of CB1Rs have been of particular interest to behavioral pharmacologists because of their selective presence within the central nervous system (CNS) and because of their association with brain-reward circuits involving mesocorticolimbic dopamine systems. One potential role that has become of considerable recent focus is the ability of CB1Rs to modulate the effects of drugs of abuse. Many drugs of abuse elevate dopamine levels, and the ability of CB1R antagonists or inverse agonists to attenuate these elevations has suggested their potential application as pharmacotherapies for treating drug abuse disorders. With the identification of the selective CB1R antagonist, SR141716, in 1994, and its subsequent widespread availability, there has been a rapid expansion of research investigating its ability to modulate the effects of drugs of abuse. The preliminary clinical reports of its success in retarding relapse in tobacco users have accelerated this expansion. This report critically reviews preclinical and clinical studies involving the ability of CB1R antagonists to attenuate the effects of drugs of abuse, while providing an overview of the neuroanatomical and neurochemical points of contact between the endocannabinoid system and systems mediating abuse-related effects.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16148435

The molecular connections between the cannabinoid system and endometriosis.

Abstract

“The endocannabinoid system consists of an array of endogenously produced bioactive lipids that activate cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and 2 (CB2) receptors. Alterations of this system have been described in almost every category of disease. These changes can be protective or maladaptive, making the endocannabinoid network an attractive therapeutic target. Little is known about the potential role of endocannabinoids in endometriosis development although this is a topic worthy of further investigation since endocannabinoid modulators have recently been shown to affect specific mechanisms critical to endometriosis establishment and maintenance. A literature review was herein performed with the aim of defining the regulation and function of the endocannabinoid signaling in in vitro and animal models of endometriosis. The components of the endocannabinoid system, CB1 and CB2 receptors and the enzymes N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine-phospholipase D and fatty acid amide hydrolase are differentially regulated throughout the menstrual cycle in the endometrium and are expressed in deep endometriotic nodules and in sensory and sympathetic neurons innervating the lesions. Selective cannabinoid receptor agonists, such as WIN 55212-2, appear to have a favorable action in limiting cell proliferation and in controlling pain symptoms. Conversely, endometrial cell migration tends to be stimulated by receptor agonists. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathways seem to be involved in these processes. However, the underlying mechanisms of action are only just beginning to unfold. Given the complexity of the system, further studies are needed to clarify whether the endocannabinoid system might represent a promising target for endometriosis.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22923487

Δ(9) -Tetrahydrocannabinol and N-arachidonyl glycine are full agonists at GPR18 receptors and induce migration in human endometrial HEC-1B cells.

Abstract

“BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

Endometriosis is a disorder in which the endometrium forms growths outside the uterus and is associated with chronic pain. Recent evidence suggests that endometrial motility plays a role in the aetiology of endometriosis. The endocannabinoid system regulates cellular migration. Given the growing involvement of the endocannabinoids in reproduction, we investigated the role of the endocannabinoid system in migration of endometrial cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH:

Migration of the human endometrial HEC-1B cells was assayed. Standard PCR techniques were used to determine the presence of the GPCR, GPR18, in HEC-1B cells, and p44/42 MAPK was assayed in stably transfected HEK293-GPR18 cells to determine receptor specificity for known cannabinoid agonists and antagonists. N-arachidonoyl ethanolamine (AEA) metabolism was measured, using HPLC/MS/MS for lipid analysis.

KEY RESULTS:

AEA, Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9) -THC) and N-arachidonoyl glycine (NAGly) induce migration of HEC-1B cells through cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-independent mechanisms. MAPK activation in HEK293-GPR18 cells revealed novel pharmacology for known CB(1) and CB(2) receptor ligands at GPR18 receptors, including Δ(9) -THC, which activates MAPK at nanomolar concentrations, whereas WIN 55212-2, CP55940, JWH-133 and JWH-015, and arachidonyl-1-hydroxy-2-propylamide (R1-methanandamide) had no effect. Moreover, HEC-1B migration and MAPK activation by NAGly and Δ(9) -THC were antagonized by Pertussis toxin, AM251 and cannabidiol.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS:

An understanding of the function and regulation of GPR18 and its molecular interactions with endogenous ligands, and how phytocannabinoids play a role with GPR18 signalling is vital if we are to comprehensively assess the function of the cannabinoid signalling system in human health and disease. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is commented on by Alexander, pp. 2411-2413 of this issue and is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine. To view Alexander visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01731.x. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2012.165.issue-8. To view Part I of Cannabinoids in Biology and Medicine visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2011.163.issue-7.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21595653

Endocannabinoid involvement in endometriosis

 “Endometriosis is a disease common in women that is defined by abnormal extrauteral growths of uterine endometrial tissue and associated with severe pain. Partly because how the abnormal growths become associated with pain is poorly understood, the pain is difficult to alleviate without resorting to hormones or surgery, which often produce intolerable side effects or fail to help. Recent studies in a rat model and women showed that sensory and sympathetic nerve fibers sprout branches to innervate the abnormal growths. This situation, together with knowledge that the endocannabinoid system is involved in uterine function and dysfunction and that exogenous cannabinoids were once used to alleviate endometriosis-associated pain, suggests that the endocannabinoid system is involved in both endometriosis and its associated pain. Here, using a rat model, we found that CB1 cannabinoid receptors are expressed on both the somata and fibers of both the sensory and sympathetic neurons that innervate endometriosis’s abnormal growths. We further found that CB1 receptor agonists decrease, whereas CB1 receptor antagonists increase, endometriosis-associated hyperalgesia. Together these findings suggest that the endocannabinoid system contributes to mechanisms underlying both the peripheral innervation of the abnormal growths and the pain associated with endometriosis, thereby providing a novel approach for the development of badly-needed new treatments.”

“These findings implicate involvement of the endocannabinoid system in reproductive function and dysfunction. The endocannabinoid system plays a key role in pain mechanisms, and, previously, cannabinoids were long used by women to alleviate dysmenorrhea.”

“Together the findings suggest that the endocannabinoid system is involved in endometriosis and its associated pain via CB1 receptors and innervation of the ectopic growths. Using the rat model, we performed a combination of immunohistochemical and pharmacological studies to test this hypothesis and assess the endocannabinoid system’s potential as a target for new therapies.”

 Summary and conclusions

“These studies in a rat model of endometriosis provide evidence that endocannabinoids might regulate the innervation of the disease’s abnormal growths and that exogenous cannabinoid agents can be effective in reducing endometriosis symptoms. The fact that CB1 receptor expression is greater in the cysts than healthy uterus from the same rats suggests that treatments to activate CB1 receptors (either directly by CB1 agonists or indirectly by increasing relevant endocannabinoid levels) could be developed with minimal effects on uterine function. Although the rat model parallels many aspects of endometriosis in women, there are of course significant differences. However, when considered together with the past history of successful use of cannabinoids for alleviation of gynecological pains, and insofar as findings in rats can model mechanisms of endometriosis-related signs and symptoms, the present results suggest that approaches targeted at the endocannbinoid system represent a promising new direction for developing badly-needed new treatments for pain suffered by women with endometriosis.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2972363/

[The endogenous cannabinoid system. Therapeutic implications for neurologic and psychiatric disorders].

Abstract

“For about 5,000 years, cannabis has been used as a therapeutic agent. There has been growing interest in the medical use of cannabinoids. This is based on the discovery that cannabinoids act with specific receptors (CB1 and CB2). CB1 receptors are located in specific brain areas (e.g. cerebellum, basal ganglia, and hippocampus) and CB2 receptors on cells of the immune system. Endogenous ligands of the cannabinoid receptors were also discovered (e.g. anandamids). Many physiologic processes are modulated by the two subtypes of cannabinoid receptor: motor functions, memory, appetite, and pain. These innovative neurobiologic/pharmacologic findings could possibly lead to the use of synthetic and natural cannabinoids as therapeutic agents in various areas. Until now, cannabinoids were used as antiemetic agents in chemotherapy-induced emesis and in patients with HIV-wasting syndrome. Evidence suggests that cannabinoids may prove useful in some other diseases, e.g. movement disorders such as Gilles de la Tourette’s syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and pain. These new findings also explain the acute adverse effects following cannabis use.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15776259

The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis and Cannabinoids

“Background

Cannabis-based medications have been a topic of intense study since the endogenous cannabinoid system was discovered two decades ago. In 2011, for the first time, a cannabis extract was approved for clinical use in Germany.”

“Therapeutic potential

Cannabis preparations exert numerous therapeutic effects. They have antispastic, analgesic, antiemetic, neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory actions, and are effective against certain psychiatric diseases. Currently, however, only one cannabis extract is approved for use. It contains THC and CBD in a 1:1 ratio and was licensed in 2011 for treatment of moderate to severe refractory spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS). In June 2012 the German Joint Federal Committee (JFC, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss) pronounced that the cannabis extract showed a “slight additional benefit” for this indication and granted a temporary license valid up to 2015.”

“The cannabis extract, which goes by the generic name nabiximols, has been approved by regulatory bodies in Germany and elsewhere for use as a sublingual spray. In the USA, dronabinol has been licensed since 1985 for the treatment of nausea and vomiting caused by cytostatic therapy and since 1992 for loss of appetite in HIV/Aids-related cachexia. In Great Britain, nabilone has been sanctioned for treatment of the side effects of chemotherapy in cancer patients.”

Results

“Cannabis-based medications exert their effects mainly through the activation of cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2). More than 100 controlled clinical trials of cannabinoids or whole-plant preparations for various indications have been conducted since 1975. The findings of these trials have led to the approval of cannabis-based medicines (dronabinol, nabilone, and a cannabis extract [THC:CBD=1:1]) in several countries. In Germany, a cannabis extract was approved in 2011 for the treatment of moderate to severe refractory spasticity in multiple sclerosis. It is commonly used off label for the treatment of anorexia, nausea, and neuropathic pain. Patients can also apply for government permission to buy medicinal cannabis flowers for self-treatment under medical supervision. The most common side effects of cannabinoids are tiredness and dizziness (in more than 10% of patients), psychological effects, and dry mouth. Tolerance to these side effects nearly always develops within a short time. Withdrawal symptoms are hardly ever a problem in the therapeutic setting.”

Conclusion

“There is now clear evidence that cannabinoids are useful for the treatment of various medical conditions.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442177/

 

Non-psychotropic plant cannabinoids: new therapeutic opportunities from an ancient herb.

“Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol binds cannabinoid (CB(1) and CB(2)) receptors, which are activated by endogenous compounds (endocannabinoids) and are involved in a wide range of physiopathological processes (e.g. modulation of neurotransmitter release, regulation of pain perception, and of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and liver functions).

The well-known psychotropic effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, which are mediated by activation of brain CB(1) receptors, have greatly limited its clinical use. However, the plant Cannabis contains many cannabinoids with weak or no psychoactivity that, therapeutically, might be more promising than Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Here, we provide an overview of the recent pharmacological advances, novel mechanisms of action, and potential therapeutic applications of such non-psychotropic plant-derived cannabinoids. Special emphasis is given to cannabidiol,

the possible applications of which have recently emerged in inflammation, diabetes, cancer, affective and neurodegenerative diseases, and to Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin, a novel CB(1) antagonist which exerts potentially useful actions in the treatment of epilepsy and obesity.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729208

Phytocannabinoids as novel therapeutic agents in CNS disorders.

Abstract

“The Cannabis sativa herb contains over 100 phytocannabinoid (pCB) compounds and has been used for thousands of years for both recreational and medicinal purposes. In the past two decades, characterisation of the body’s endogenous cannabinoid (CB) (endocannabinoid, eCB) system (ECS) has highlighted activation of central CB(1) receptors by the major pCB, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC) as the primary mediator of the psychoactive, hyperphagic and some of the potentially therapeutic properties of ingested cannabis. Whilst Δ(9)-THC is the most prevalent and widely studied pCB, it is also the predominant psychotropic component of cannabis, a property that likely limits its widespread therapeutic use as an isolated agent. In this regard, research focus has recently widened to include other pCBs including cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), Δ(9)tetrahydrocannabivarin (Δ(9)-THCV) and cannabidivarin (CBDV), some of which show potential as therapeutic agents in preclinical models of CNS disease. Moreover, it is becoming evident that these non-Δ(9)-THC pCBs act at a wide range of pharmacological targets, not solely limited to CB receptors. Disorders that could be targeted include epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, affective disorders and the central modulation of feeding behaviour. Here, we review pCB effects in preclinical models of CNS disease and, where available, clinical trial data that support therapeutic effects. Such developments may soon yield the first non-Δ(9)-THC pCB-based medicines.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21924288

[The mechanism of action of cannabis and cannabinoids].

Abstract

“The effect of cannabis can be explained on the basis of the function of the cannabinoid receptor system, which consists of CB receptors (CB1, CB2), endoligands to activate these receptors and an enzyme–fatty acid amidohydrolase–to metabolize the endoligands. The endoligands of the cannabinoid receptor system are arachidonic acid-like substances, and are called endocannabinoids. Indications exist that the body also contains arachidonic acid-like substances that inhibit fatty acid amido hydrolase. Various cannabinoids have diverse effects on the receptors, functioning as agonists, antagonists or partial antagonists, as well as affecting the vanilloid receptor. Many known effects of cannabis can be explained on the basis of this mechanism of action as can the use of cannabis in various conditions including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, glaucoma, nausea, vomiting and rheumatoid arthritis.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16463612