Category Archives: Uncategorized

Effects of tetrahydrocannabinol on glucose uptake in the rat brain.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for neuropharmacology journal

“Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the psychoactive component of the plant Cannabis sativa and acts as a partial agonist at cannabinoid type 1 and type 2 receptors in the brain.

The goal of this study was to assess the effect of THC on the cerebral glucose uptake in the rat brain.

Low blood THC levels of <1 ng/ml corresponded to an increased glucose uptake while blood THC levels > 10 ng/ml coincided with a decreased glucose uptake. The effective concentration in this region was estimated 2.4 ng/ml.

This glucose PET study showed that stimulation of CB1 receptors by THC affects the glucose uptake in the rat brain, whereby the effect of THC is regionally different and dependent on dose – an effect that may be of relevance in behavioural studies.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219717

Human Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Ligand-interaction Motif: Transmembrane Helix 2 Cysteine, C2.59(89), as Determinant of Classical Cannabinoid Agonist Activity and Binding Pose.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for ACS Chem Neurosci.

“Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2R)-dependent signaling is implicated in neuronal physiology and immune surveillance by brain microglia. Selective CB2R agonists hold therapeutic promise for inflammatory and other neurological disorders.

Information on human CB2R (hCB2R) ligand-binding and functional domains is needed to inform the rational design and optimization of candidate drug-like hCB2R agonists.

These data constitute initial evidence that TMH2 cysteine C2.59(89) is a component of the hCB2R binding pocket for classical cannabinoids.

The results further demonstrate how interactions between classical cannabinoids and specific amino acids within the hCB2R* ligand-binding domain act as determinants of agonist pharmacological properties and the architecture of the agonist-hCB2R* conformational ensemble, allowing the receptor to adopt distinct activity states, such that interaction of classical cannabinoids with TMH6 cysteine C6.47(257) favors a binding pose more advantageous for agonist potency than does their interaction with TMH2 cysteine C2.59(89).”

 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28220706

The Inhibitory Effect of S-777469, a Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor Agonist, on Skin Inflammation in Mice.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for pharmacology journal

“We investigated the effects of S-777469 (1-[[6-Ethyl-1-[4-fluorobenzyl]-5-methyl-2-oxo-1, 2-dihydropyridine-3-carbonyl]amino]-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid), a novel cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2) agonist, on 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB)-induced ear inflammation and mite antigen-induced dermatitis in mice. The oral administration of S-777469 significantly suppressed DNFB-induced ear swelling in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, S-777469 significantly alleviated mite antigen-induced atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions in NC/Nga mice. A histological analysis revealed that S-777469 significantly reduced the epidermal thickness and the number of mast cells infiltrating skin lesions. We demonstrated that S-777469 inhibited mite antigen-induced eosinophil accumulation in skin lesions and an endogenous CB2 ligand, 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)-induced eosinophil migration in vitro. Moreover, we confirmed that 2-AG levels significantly increased in skin lesions of mite antigen-induced dermatitis model. Together, these results suggest that S-777469 inhibits skin inflammation in mice by blocking the activities of 2-AG.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214870

Brain cannabinoid systems as targets for the therapy of neurological disorders.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for Neurobiology of Disease

“Unprecedented developments in cannabinoid research within the past decade include discovery of a brain (CB1) and peripheral (CB2) receptor; endogenous ligands, anandamide, and 2-arachidonylglycerol; cannabinoid drug-induced partial and inverse agonism at CB1 receptors, antagonism of NMDA receptors and glutamate, and antioxidant activity; and preferential CB1 receptor localization in areas subserving spasticity, pain, abnormal involuntary movements, seizures, and amnesia. These endogenous structures and chemicals and mechanisms are potentially new pathophysiologic substrates, and targets for novel cannabinoid treatments, of several neurological disorders.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9974182 

“Endocannabinoid System in Neurological Disorders.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27364363
 
“Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604187/

Cannabinoid-based medicines for neurological disorders–clinical evidence.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for Mol Neurobiol

“Whereas the cannabis plant has a long history of medicinal use, it is only in recent years that a sufficient understanding of the pharmacology of the main plant constituents has allowed for a better understanding of the most rational therapeutic targets.

The distribution of cannabinoid receptors, both within the nervous system and without, and the development of pharmacological tools to investigate their function has lead to a substantial increase in efforts to develop cannabinoids as therapeutic agents.

Concomitant with these efforts, the understanding of the pharmacology of plant cannabinoids at receptor and other systems distinct from the cannabinoid receptors suggests that the therapeutic applications of plant-derived cannabinoids (and presumably their synthetic derivatives also) may be diverse.

This review aims to discuss the clinical evidence investigating the use of medicines derived, directly or indirectly, from plant cannabinoids with special reference to neurological disorders.

Published studies suggest that the oral administration of cannabinoids may not be the preferred route of administration and that plant extracts show greater evidence of efficacy than synthetic compounds. One of these, Sativex (GW Pharmaceuticals), was approved as a prescription medicine in Canada in 2005 and is currently under regulatory review in the EU.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17952657

“Endocannabinoid System in Neurological Disorders.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27364363
 
“Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604187/

“Cannabinoids: new promising agents in the treatment of neurological diseases.”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407719

Cannabis: old medicine with new promise for neurological disorders.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs

“Marijuana is a complex substance containing over 60 different forms of cannabinoids, the active ingredients. Cannabinoids are now known to have the capacity for neuromodulation, via direct, receptor-based mechanisms at numerous levels within the nervoussystem. These have therapeutic properties that may be applicable to the treatment of neurological disorders; including anti-oxidative, neuroprotective, analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions; immunomodulation, modulation of glial cells and tumor growth regulation. This article reviews the emerging research on the physiological mechanisms of endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids in the context of neurological disease.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12054093

“Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604187/

Cannabis use and the course and outcome of major depressive disorder: A population based longitudinal study.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for Psychiatry Research

“Cannabis use has been reported to affect the course of various psychiatric disorders, however its effect on the course of major depressive disorder (MDD) is not yet clear.

After adjusting for baseline confounding factors, no associations were found between cannabis use and suicidality, functionality and quality of life.

We conclude that many of the associations between cannabis use and a more severe course of MDD do not seem to be attributed to cannabis use itself but to associated sociodemographic and clinical factors.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28214781

Targeting the endocannabinoid/CB1 receptor system for treating obesity in Prader–Willi syndrome

Posted on by
Reply

Related image

“Extreme obesity is a core phenotypic feature of Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS). Among numerous metabolic regulators, the endocannabinoid (eCB) system is critically involved in controlling feeding, body weight, and energy metabolism, and a globally acting cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) blockade reverses obesity both in animals and humans.

We studied eCB ‘tone’ in individuals with PWS and in the Magel2-null mouse model that recapitulates the major metabolic phenotypes of PWS and determined the efficacy of a peripherally restricted CB1R antagonist, JD5037 in treating obesity in these mice.

 Dysregulation of the eCB/CB1R system may contribute to hyperphagia and obesity in Magel2-null mice and in individuals with PWS. Our results demonstrate that treatment with peripherally restricted CB1R antagonists may be an effective strategy for the management of severe obesity in PWS.

In conclusion, the current study provides the first evidence that the eCB system may contribute to severe obesity both in PWS children and adults and in an established mouse model for this syndrome. Our results confirm that the eCB system contributes to the metabolic phenotype associated with PWS. Moreover, specifically targeting the peripheral eCB system in obese Magel2-null mice was found to be as efficacious as in DIO animals, and, therefore, it may represent a novel approach to treating obesity and its complications in PWS. This would also provide the rationale for the development and clinical testing of peripherally restricted CB1R antagonists for treating obesity in PWS.”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123200/

“Cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1R) blockers as medicines: beyond obesity and cardiometabolic disorders to substance abuse/drug addiction with CB1R neutral antagonists.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22335400

“The phytocannabinoid, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), can block cannabinoid CB(1) receptors” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2931567/

Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Signaling in Neurodegenerative Disorders: From Pathogenesis to a Promising Therapeutic Target.

Posted on by
Reply

Image result for Front Neurosci

“As a consequence of an increasingly aging population, the number of people affected by neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease, is rapidly increasing. Although the etiology of these diseases has not been completely defined, common molecular mechanisms including neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction have been confirmed and can be targeted therapeutically.

Moreover, recent studies have shown that endogenous cannabinoid signaling plays a number of modulatory roles throughout the central nervous system (CNS), including the neuroinflammation and neurogenesis.

In particular, the up-regulation of type-2 cannabinoid (CB2) receptors has been found in a number of neurodegenerative disorders. Thus, the modulation of CB2 receptor signaling may represent a promising therapeutic target with minimal psychotropic effects that can be used to modulate endocannabinoid-based therapeutic approaches and to reduce neuronal degeneration.

For these reasons this review will focus on the CB2 receptor as a promising pharmacological target in a number of neurodegenerative diseases.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210207

“Targeting Cannabinoid CB2 Receptors in the Central Nervous System. Medicinal Chemistry Approaches with Focus on Neurodegenerative Disorders”  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5020102/

“The influence of cannabinoids on generic traits of neurodegeneration.  Modulation of the endogenous cannabinoid system is emerging as a potentially viable option in the treatment of neurodegeneration. Endocannabinoid signalling has been found to be altered in many neurodegenerative disorders. To this end, pharmacological manipulation of the endogenous cannabinoid system, as well as application of phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids have been investigated. Through multiple lines of evidence, this evolutionarily conserved neurosignalling system has shown neuroprotective capabilities and is therefore a potential target for neurodegenerative disorders. This review details the mechanisms of neurodegeneration and highlights the beneficial effects of cannabinoid treatment.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954477/

 

Transient Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Blockade during Immunization Heightens Intensity and Breadth of Antigen-specific Antibody Responses in Young and Aged mice.

Posted on by
Reply

 

Image result for Sci Rep.

“The hallmark of vaccines is their ability to prevent the spread of infectious pathogens and thereby serve as invaluable public health tool. Despite their medical relevance, there is a gap in our understanding of the physiological factors that mediate innate and adaptive immune response to vaccines.

The endocannabinoid (eCB) system is a critical modulator of homeostasis in vertebrates. Our results indicate that macrophages and dendritic cells produce the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycerol (2-AG) upon antigen activation.

We have also established that 2-AG levels are upregulated in the serum and in the lymph node of mice during vaccination.

We hypothesized that the intrinsic release of eCBs from immune cells during activation by pathogenic antigens mitigate inflammation, but also suppress overall innate and adaptive immune response.

Here we demonstrate, for the first time, that transient administration of the cannabinoid receptor 2 antagonist AM630 (10 mg/kg) or inverse agonist JTE907 (3 mg/kg) during immunization heightens the intensity and breadth of antigen-specific immune responses in young and aged mice through the upregulation of immunomodulatory genes in secondary lymphoid tissues.”

 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209996