Category Archives: Uncategorized

Cannabinoids inhibit fibrogenesis in diffuse systemic sclerosis fibroblasts.

Posted on by
Reply

Rheumatology

“Recently, it has also been demonstrated that the pleiotropic cannabinoid system is involved in both liver and pancreatic fibrosis. Furthermore, cannabinoids may play a pro- or anti-fibrogenic role depending on their interaction with CB1r or CB2r.

This raises the possibility that pharmacologic modulation of the endocannabinoid system could be a target to limit tissue damage in pathologic fibrosis.

It has been demonstrated that the endocannabinoid system is up-regulated in pathologic fibrosis and that modulation of the cannabinoid receptors might limit the progression of uncontrolled fibrogenesis.

Both CB1 and CB2 receptors were over-expressed in dcSSc fibroblasts compared with healthy controls.

Our preliminary findings suggest that cannabinoids are provided with an anti-fibrotic activity, thereby possibly representing a new class of agents targeting fibrosis diseases.”

http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/9/1050.long

Can Cannabinoids Modulate Fibrotic Progression in Systemic Sclerosis?

Posted on by
Reply

“Since ancient times, plants have been used for therapeutic purposes.

Cannabis sativa has been widely used as a medicinal herb by Ayurveda and traditional Chinese medicine for centuries.

According to our in vitro and in vivo experimental models, cannabinoids are able to modulate fibrosis.

The exact mechanism underlying this effect requires further investigation, but it seems to go beyond their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties.

Based on the above observations, we aimed to investigate the role of cannabinoids in systemic sclerosis (SSc), an autoimmune disease characterized by diffuse fibrosis.

Since preclinical data on cannabinoids show their capability to modulate fibrosis, inflammation and vasodilatation, these molecules could be ideal drugs for targeting SSc.”

http://www.ima.org.il/FilesUpload/IMAJ/0/193/96907.pdf

Drug vaping applied to cannabis: Is “Cannavaping” a therapeutic alternative to marijuana?

Posted on by
Reply

“Therapeutic cannabis administration is increasingly used in Western countries due to its positive role in several pathologies. Dronabinol or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) pills, ethanolic cannabis tinctures, oromucosal sprays or table vaporizing devices are available but other cannabinoid forms can be used.

Inspired by the illegal practice of dabbing of butane hashish oil (BHO), cannabinoids from cannabis were extracted with butane gas, and the resulting concentrate (BHO) was atomized with specific vaporizing devices. The efficiency of “cannavaping,” defined as the “vaping” of liquid refills for e-cigarettes enriched with cannabinoids, including BHO, was studied as an alternative route of administration for therapeutic cannabinoids.

The results showed that illegal cannavaping would be subjected to marginal development due to the poor solubility of BHO in commercial liquid refills (especially those with high glycerin content). This prevents the manufacture of liquid refills with high BHO concentrations adopted by most recreational users of cannabis to feel the psychoactive effects more rapidly and extensively.

Conversely, “therapeutic cannavaping” could be an efficient route for cannabinoids administration because less concentrated cannabinoids-enriched liquid refills are required. However, the electronic device marketed for therapeutic cannavaping should be carefully designed to minimize potential overheating and contaminant generation.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228348

New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms.

Posted on by
Reply

“Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are prevalent in the general population, especially in those of advanced age, and are characterized by notable diversity in etiology and presentation, and have been proven to cause various degrees of impairment on quality of life.

The prostate has traditionally been regarded as the core cause of male LUTS. As a result, medical treatment aims to provide symptomatic relief and effective management of progression of male LUTS due to benign prostatic enlargement.

Anti-inflammatory agents, vitamin D3-receptor analogs, and cannabinoids represent treatment modalities currently under investigation for use in LUTS patients.

Furthermore, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonists, transient receptor-potential channel blockers, purinergic neurotransmission antagonists, Rho-kinase inhibitors, and inhibitors of endothelin-converting enzymes could have therapeutic potential in LUTS management, but still remain in the experimental setting.

This article reviews new strategies for the medical treatment of male LUTS, which are dictated by the potential role of the bladder and the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia progression. Moreover, combination treatments and therapies currently under investigation are also presented.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27218069

Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) agonists and antagonists: a patent update.

Posted on by
Reply

“Modulation of the CB2 receptor is an interesting approach for pain and inflammation, arthritis, addictions, neuroprotection, and cancer, among other possible therapeutic applications, and is devoid of central side effects.

Structural diversity of CB2 modulator scaffolds characterized the patent literature.

Several CB2 agonists reached clinical Phase II for pain management and inflammation.

Other therapeutic applications need to be explored such as neuroprotection and/or neurodegeneration.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215781

Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of a combination of cannabidiol and moringin in LPS-stimulated macrophages.

Posted on by
Reply

“Inflammatory response plays an important role in the activation and progress of many debilitating diseases. Natural products, like cannabidiol, a constituent of Cannabis sativa, and moringin, an isothiocyanate obtained from myrosinase-mediated hydrolysis of the glucosinolate precursor glucomoringin present in Moringa oleifera seeds, are well known antioxidants also endowed with anti-inflammatory activity.

This is due to a covalent-based mechanism for ITC, while non-covalent interactions underlie the activity of CBD. Since these two mechanisms are distinct, and the molecular endpoints are potentially complementary, we investigated in a comparative way the protective effect of these compounds alone or in combination on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine macrophages.

Our results show that the cannabidiol (5μM) and moringin (5μM) combination outperformed the single constituents that, at this dosage had only a moderate efficacy on inflammatory (Tumor necrosis factor-α, Interleukin-10) and oxidative markers (inducible nitric oxide synthase, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, nitrotyrosine). Significant upregulation of Bcl-2 and downregulation of Bax and cleaved caspase-3 was observed in cells treated with cannabidiol-moringin combination.

Treatment with the transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 antagonist was detrimental for the efficacy of cannabidiol, while no effect was elicited by cannabinoid receptor 1 and cannabinoid receptor 2 antagonists. None of these receptors was involved in the activity of moringin.

Taken together, our in vitro results testify the anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and anti-apoptotic effects of the combination of cannabidiol and moringin.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215129

[MEDICAL CANNABIS].

Posted on by
Reply

“The cannabis plant has been known to humanity for centuries as a remedy for pain, diarrhea and inflammation.

Current research is inspecting the use of cannabis for many diseases, including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, dystonia, and chronic pain.

In inflammatory conditions cannabinoids improve pain in rheumatoid arthritis and: pain and diarrhea in Crohn’s disease.

Despite their therapeutic potential, cannabinoids are not free of side effects including psychosis, anxiety, paranoia, dependence and abuse.

Controlled clinical studies investigating the therapeutic potential of cannabis are few and small, whereas pressure for expanding cannabis use is increasing.

Currently, as long as cannabis is classified as an illicit drug and until further controlled studies are performed, the use of medical cannabis should be limited to patients who failed conventional better established treatment.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215115

On the move: Exploring the impact of residential mobility on cannabis use.

Posted on by
Reply

“In this study we utilise multilevel models with longitudinal data to simultaneously estimate between-child and within-child effects in the relationship between residential mobility and cannabis use, allowing us to determine the extent to which cannabis use in adolescence is driven by residential mobility and unobserved confounding.

Our findings suggest that residential mobility in the teenage years does not place children at an increased risk of cannabis use throughout these years.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211865

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists: implication in CNS disorders.

Posted on by
Reply

“Since the discovery of the cannabinoid receptors, numerous studies associate the endocannabinoid system with several physiological and pathological processes including cancer, appetite, fertility, memory, neuropathic and inflammatory pain, obesity, and neurodegenerative diseases.

Over the last two decades, several researches have been dedicated extensively on the cannabinoid receptors ligands since the direct activation of cannabinoid receptors results in several beneficial effects, in the brain and in the periphery.

During past years, cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor ligands from plants or lab were rapidly developed and then various new structures were reported to be cannabinoids.

The CB1 and CB2 receptor ligands offer several therapeutic opportunities for several CNS-related diseases.

Based on the scientific literature, this review provides an overview of CB1 and CB2 receptor synthetic ligands obtained from drug research and in particular those synthesized for therapeutic purposes and potential clinical applications for central nervous system disorders.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193072

Functional selectivity of CB2 cannabinoid receptor ligands at a canonical and non-canonical pathway.

Posted on by
Reply

“The CB2 cannabinoid receptor remains a tantalizing, but unrealized therapeutic target. CB2 receptor ligands belong to varied structural classes and display extreme functional selectivity. Here we have screened diverse CB2 receptor ligands at canonical (inhibition of adenylyl cyclase) and non-canonical (arrestin recruitment) pathways. The non-classical cannabinoid, CP55940 was the most potent agonist for both pathways, while the classical cannabinoid ligand JWH133 was the most efficacious agonist amongst all the ligands profiled in cyclase assays. In the cyclase assay, other classical cannabinoids showed little (Δ9THC, KM233) to no efficacy (L759633 and L759656). Most aminoalkylindoles including WIN55212-2 were moderate efficacy agonists. The cannabilactone AM1710 was equi-efficacious to CP55940 to inhibit adenylyl cyclase, albeit with lower potency. In the arrestin recruitment assays, all classical cannabinoid ligands failed to recruit arrestins, indicating a bias towards G protein coupling for this class of compound. All aminoalkylindoles tested, except for WIN55212-2 and UR144, failed to recruit arrestin. WIN55212-2 was a low efficacy agonist for arrestin recruitment, while UR144 was arrestin biased with no significant inhibition of cyclase. Endocannabinoids were G protein biased with no arrestin recruitment. The diarylpyrazole antagonist, SR144528 was an inverse agonist in cyclase and arrestin recruitment assays while the aminoalkylindole AM630 and carboxamide JTE907 were inverse agonists in cyclase but low efficacy agonists in arrestin recruitment assays. Thus CB2 receptor ligands display strong and varied functional selectivity at both pathways. Therefore extreme care must be exercised when using these compounds to infer the role of CB2 receptors in vivo.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194477