Preparation and characterization of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol-loaded biodegradable polymeric microparticles and their antitumoral efficacy on cancer cell lines.

“Cannabinoids present an interesting therapeutic potential as antiemetics, appetite stimulants in debilitating diseases (cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis), analgesics, and in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and cancer, among other conditions.

However, despite their high clinical potential, only few dosage forms are available to date.

In this paper, the development of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) biodegradable microspheres as an alternative delivery system for cannabinoid parenteral administration is proposed.

As THC has shown therapeutic potential as anticancer drug, the efficacy of the microspheres was tested on different cancer cell lines.

Interestingly, the microspheres were able to inhibit cancer cell proliferation during the nine-day study period.

All the above results suggest that the use of biodegradable microspheres would be a suitable alternative delivery system for THC administration.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773072

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of Δ⁹-tetrahidrocannabinol/PLGA nanoparticles for cancer chemotherapy.

“Nanoplatforms can optimize the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy, and thus cancer therapy. However, new approaches are encouraged in developing new nanomedicines against malignant cells.

In this work, a reproducible methodology is described to prepare Δ(9)-tetrahidrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC)-loaded poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles against lung cancer.

Cell viability studies comparing the activity of the nanoformulations against human A-549 and murine LL2 lung adenocarcinoma cells, and human embryo lung fibroblastic MRC-5 cells revealed a statistically significant selective cytotoxic effect toward the lung cancer cell lines.

In addition, cytotoxicity assays in A-549 cells demonstrated the more intense anticancer activity of Δ(9)-THC-loaded PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles.

These promising results were confirmed by in vivo studies in LL2 lung tumor-bearing immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25899283

Characterization of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and anandamide antinociception in nonarthritic and arthritic rats.

“The hypothesis was tested that THC and anandamide elicit antinociception in the paw pressure test, and that arthritic rats would exhibit a different response.

THC and anandamide appear to release an as yet unknown endogenous opioid, because naloxone significantly blocked their effects.

This study indicates that anandamide and THC may act at different receptor sites to modulate endogenous opioid levels in mechanical nociception.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9610941

Delayed treatment with cannabidiol has a cerebroprotective action via a cannabinoid receptor-independent myeloperoxidase-inhibiting mechanism.

“We examined the neuroprotective mechanism of cannabidiol, non-psychoactive component of marijuana, on the infarction in a 4 h mouse middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion model in comparison with Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC).

Both pre- and post-ischemic treatment with cannabidiol resulted in potent and long-lasting neuroprotection, whereas only pre-ischemic treatment with Delta(9)-THC reduced the infarction.

Unlike Delta(9)-THC, cannabidiol did not affect the excess release of glutamate in the cortex after occlusion.

Cannabidiol suppressed the decrease in cerebral blood flow by the failure of cerebral microcirculation after reperfusion and inhibited MPO activity in neutrophils.

Furthermore, the number of MPO-immunopositive cells was reduced in the ipsilateral hemisphere in cannabidiol-treated group.

Cannabidiol provides potent and long-lasting neuroprotection through an anti-inflammatory CB(1) receptor-independent mechanism, suggesting that cannabidiol will have a palliative action and open new therapeutic possibilities for treating cerebrovascular disorders.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17437545

Cannabinoids in bipolar affective disorder: a review and discussion of their therapeutic potential.

“Bipolar affective disorder is often poorly controlled by prescribed drugs.

Cannabis use is common in patients with this disorder and anecdotal reports suggest that some patients take it to alleviate symptoms of both mania and depression.

We undertook a literature review of cannabis use by patients with bipolar disorder and of the neuropharmacological properties of cannabinoids suggesting possible therapeutic effects in this condition.

No systematic studies of cannabinoids in bipolar disorder were found to exist, although some patients claim that cannabis relieves symptoms of mania and/or depression.

The cannabinoids Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) may exert sedative, hypnotic, anxiolytic, antidepressant, antipsychotic and anticonvulsant effects.

Pure synthetic cannabinoids, such as dronabinol and nabilone and specific plant extracts containing THC, CBD, or a mixture of the two in known concentrations, are available and can be delivered sublingually.

Controlled trials of these cannabinoids as adjunctive medication in bipolar disorder are now indicated.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888515

The cannabinoids: therapeutic potentials.

 

“A review of the therapeutic potentials of the cannabinoids is presented. With respect to the antifertility aspects of cannabinoids, 2 mg delta 9-THC suppressed luteinizing hormone secretion in rats and 2 and 3 mg/kg resulted in a deterioation of male sexual performance. A new chapter in marijuana research was opened in 1964 with the identification of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol as the active ingredient. Antiedema, analgesic, antipyretic, antiinflammatory, antifertility, antiepileptic, anticonvulsant, antihypertensive, cardiotonic, pulmonary, and antidepressant effects along with potentiation of barbiturates and analgesics are reviewed leading one to the conclusion that marijuana is “a drug for all reasons”. During the past decade many investigators have pursued the possibility of modification of the delta 9 structure to delineate activities. 1 compound, Abbott 40656, SP106, a water-soluble benzopyran derivative is presently under Phase 1 clinical evaluation as a sedative-hypnotic.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12307093/

Cannabis compound benefits blood vessels

This computer rendition shows how fatty deposits can narrow blood vessels.

“Low dose helps combat formation of arterial blockages.

A compound derived from the cannabis plant protects blood vessels from dangerous clogging, a study of mice has shown.

The compound, called delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), combats the blood-vessel disease atherosclerosis in mice.

The discovery could lead to new drugs to ward off heart disease and stroke.”

http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050404/full/news050404-7.html

 

Cannabinoid Receptor Found to Help Suppress Habitual Behavior

“A mouse study finds that CB1 protein in orbitofrontal cortex neurons mediates the ability to switch between habitual and active-learning behaviors when needed.

Everyone carries out daily habits and routines. As David Lovinger, Ph.D., chief of the Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), explained, “If your brain does not habitualize familiar tasks or places, it would be very difficult to focus because you’re constantly processing all these sensory inputs.”

Nonetheless, it’s important that the brain can shift from habit mode to a more active, goal-directed mindset. While an occasional lapse is normal, a chronic inability to exit from habitual behavior is a critical element of both addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorders. A new study carried out by Lovinger and colleagues adds to the understanding of the brain circuits responsible for the habitual/goal-directed shift.

The results, published June 15 in Neuron, also point to a receptor called cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) as a key regulator of this circuitry.

The findings were made possible using a training strategy that enabled mice to push levers for food in both a habitual and goal-directed manner. The mice were placed in enclosures with differing visual decorations; the lever in the first dropped a food reward after it was pressed a certain number of times, while the lever in the second would drop a reward at a random time after the lever had been pressed once.

“In the first scenario, the mouse makes the connection quickly that pressing the lever 20 times, for example, gets it a reward,” Lovinger told Psychiatric News. “In the second enclosure, that contiguity is disrupted. The mouse knows that pressing will eventually lead to reward, but it doesn’t know how many, so it will just start pressing at a periodic rate.”

On alternate testing days, the mice were allowed to eat their treats prior to the testing, and on these days—termed the devalued state because the desire for the reward is lessened—mice pressed the lever far less in the goal-directed enclosure, but still roughly the same amount in the random-time enclosure—much like a habit.

The researchers then tried these tests out on mice in which the neurons that travel between the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and dorsal striatum (DS, which links decision making and reward behaviors) were blocked and observed that the mice kept pressing a lot in both enclosures, suggesting an inability to switch out of habit mode.

“Normally, on devalued days the urge to default to the habit of pressing the lever repeatedly gets suppressed in some way because the brain is providing information that the food isn’t as valuable,” Lovinger said.

With the OFC-DS connection identified, the next question was what part of these neurons was responsible for suppressing habits? Some previous work by Lovinger’s colleague and study coauthor Rui Costa, Ph.D., an investigator at the Champalimaud Institute for the Unknown in Lisbon, Portugal, pointed to CB1 as a potential candidate; the CB1 receptor interacts with endocannabinoids, natural messenger molecules in the body that are strikingly similar to THC, the active compound in marijuana.

When mice lacking the CB1 receptor in their OFC neurons were trained, they reduced their lever pressing in both enclosures on devalued days, reflective of a state in which the mice always used goal-directed behaviors because they could not form habits.

Having found CB1 as the receptor that Helps suppress habits, Lovinger said the next step would be to find the agent in the OFC-DS neural circuit that strengthens habits—and that should provide major clues about how drugs of abuse like alcohol and marijuana disrupt the normal process of habituation.

While the NIAAA is more focused on the addiction side, Lovinger thinks the current knowledge gained on weakened habits could be valuable in neuropsychiatry as well.

“It may be a bit of a stretch, but ADHD could be mediated in part by reduced habit-forming potential,” he said. “If someone is trying to pay attention to all potential outcomes in every decision, it could explain the lack of focus displayed by people with ADHD.””

http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2016.7b25

Refractory trigeminal neuralgia responsive to nabiximols in a patient with multiple sclerosis.

“Nabiximols is a cannabinoid compound approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related spasticity.

However, additional symptoms, such as pain, urinary urgency and sleep disturbance, may benefit from treatment.

CASE REPORT:

The present report describes a patient with secondary progressive MS and severe lower limbs spasticity who was started on treatment with nabiximols. The patient also suffered from trigeminal neuralgia, which he was not treating due to inefficacy or side effects of all previously tried medications. After nabiximols initiation the patient experienced a marked benefit on trigeminal neuralgia, which completely resolved, while spasticity responded only partially to treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Nabiximols mechanism of action is based on the interaction with CB1 and CB2 receptors, which are expressed by central nervous system neurons and are known to modulate pain among other effects. The present case indicates that nabiximols and other cannabinoids need to be further tested for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456876

“Therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in trigeminal neuralgia. Considering the pronounced antinociceptive effects produced by cannabinoids, they may be a promising therapeutic approach for the clinical management of trigeminal neuralgia.”  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15578967

Should we care about sativex-induced neurobehavioral effects? A 6-month follow-up study.

“Sativex® is an exclusive cannabinoid-based drug approved for the treatment of spasticity due to Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

The most common side effects include dizziness, nausea, and somnolence. However, it is still under debate whether the drug could cause negative cognitive effects.

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of Sativex® on functional and psychological status in cannabis-naïve MS patients.

After the treatment, we did not observe any significant neurobehavioral impairment in all the patients, but one.

Our findings suggest that Sativex® treatment does not significantly affect the cognitive and neurobehavioral functions.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460745